Suppr超能文献

全身使用抗生素作为种植体周围炎非手术治疗辅助手段的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Efficacy of systemic use of antibiotics as an adjunct to nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Luo Ruxi, Li Lei, Wang Wentian

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2024 Feb 28;55(2):120-128. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b4551761.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The role of antibiotics as an adjunct to nonsurgical peri-implantitis treatment approaches has not reached a consensus. This meta-analysis aimed to review the adjunctive effect of systemic use of metronidazole and amoxicillin in patients with peri-implantitis.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials published from inception to January 2023.

RESULTS

A total of five clinical trials with a total of 211 patients were included in the analyses. No significant difference was found in the reduction of probing pocket depth at 3 and 6 months of follow-up (3 months: weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.336, 95% CI -0.966 to 0.233, P = .231; 6 months: WMD = -0.533, 95% CI -1.654 to 0.587, P = .351). A statistically significant difference was found at 12 months of follow-up (WMD = -1.327, 95% CI -1.803 to -0.852, P < .001) between the treatment and control groups. The combined results indicated that the differences in reduction of bleeding on probing, Plaque Index score, and bone level at 6 months of follow-up were significant (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that the adjunctive use of systemic metronidazole and amoxicillin did not significantly improve probing pocket depth compared to nonsurgical treatment alone, and should not be routinely recommended. However, the significant reductions in bleeding on probing, Plaque Index, and bone level at 6 months may indicate a potential effect of treating peri-implantitis with adjunctive systemic metronidazole and amoxicillin.

摘要

目的

抗生素作为非手术性种植体周围炎治疗方法辅助手段的作用尚未达成共识。本荟萃分析旨在综述全身使用甲硝唑和阿莫西林对种植体周围炎患者的辅助治疗效果。

方法与材料

检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,查找从创刊至2023年1月发表的随机对照试验。

结果

分析共纳入5项临床试验,总计211例患者。在随访3个月和6个月时,探诊深度减少方面未发现显著差异(3个月:加权平均差[WMD]=-0.336,95%置信区间-0.966至0.233,P=0.231;6个月:WMD=-0.533,95%置信区间-1.654至0.587,P=0.351)。在随访12个月时,治疗组和对照组之间存在统计学显著差异(WMD=-1.327,95%置信区间-1.803至-0.852,P<0.001)。综合结果表明,随访6个月时,探诊出血减少、菌斑指数评分和骨水平方面的差异具有显著性(P<0.05)。

结论

该研究表明,与单纯非手术治疗相比,全身使用甲硝唑和阿莫西林作为辅助治疗并不能显著改善探诊深度,不应常规推荐。然而,6个月时探诊出血、菌斑指数和骨水平的显著降低可能表明全身使用甲硝唑和阿莫西林辅助治疗种植体周围炎具有潜在效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验