Meden V, Grunwald L, Kennes D M
Institut für Theorie der Statistischen Physik, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, Center for Free Electron Laser Science, 22761 Hamburg, Germany.
Rep Prog Phys. 2023 Nov 16;86(12). doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/ad05f3.
We review the methodology to theoretically treat parity-time- (PT-) symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems. They are realized as open quantum systems withPTsymmetry and couplings to the environment which are compatible.PT-symmetric non-Hermitian quantum systems show a variety of fascinating properties which single them out among generic open systems. The study of the latter has a long history in quantum theory. These studies are based on the Hermiticity of the combined system-reservoir setup and were developed by the atomic, molecular, and optical physics as well as the condensed matter physics communities. The interest of the mathematical physics community inPT-symmetric, non-Hermitian systems led to a new perspective and the development of the elegant mathematical formalisms ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics, which do not make any reference to the environment. In the mathematical physics research, the focus is mainly on the remarkable spectral properties of the Hamiltonians and the characteristics of the corresponding single-particle eigenstates. Despite being non-Hermitian, the Hamiltonians can show parameter regimes, in which all eigenvalues are real. To investigate emergent quantum many-body phenomena in condensed matter physics and to make contact to experiments one, however, needs to study expectation values of observables and correlation functions. One furthermore, has to investigate statistical ensembles and not only eigenstates. The adoption of the concepts ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics by parts of the condensed matter community led to a controversial status of the methodology. There is no consensus on fundamental issues, such as, what a proper observable is, how expectation values are supposed to be computed, and what adequate equilibrium statistical ensembles and their corresponding density matrices are. With the technological progress in engineering and controlling open quantum many-body systems it is high time to reconcile the Hermitian with thePT-symmetric and biorthogonal perspectives. We comprehensively review the different approaches, including the overreaching idea of pseudo-Hermiticity. To motivate the Hermitian perspective, which we propagate here, we mainly focus on the ancilla approach. It allows to embed a non-Hermitian system into a larger, Hermitian one. In contrast to other techniques, e.g. master equations, it does not rely on any approximations. We discuss the peculiarities ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics. In these, what is considered to be an observable depends on the Hamiltonian or the selected (biorthonormal) basis. Crucially in addition, what is denoted as an 'expectation value' lacks a direct probabilistic interpretation, and what is viewed as the canonical density matrix is non-stationary and non-Hermitian. Furthermore, the non-unitarity of the time evolution is hidden within the formalism. We pick up several model Hamiltonians, which so far were either investigated from the Hermitian perspective or from thePT-symmetric and biorthogonal one, and study them within the respective alternative framework. This includes a simple two-level, single-particle problem but also a many-body lattice model showing quantum critical behavior. Comparing the outcome of the two types of computations shows that the Hermitian approach, which, admittedly, is in parts clumsy, always leads to results which are physically sensible. In the rare cases, in which a comparison to experimental data is possible, they furthermore agree to these. In contrast, the mathematically elegantPT-symmetric and biorthogonal approaches lead to results which, are partly difficult to interpret physically. We thus conclude that the Hermitian methodology should be employed. However, to fully appreciate the physics ofPT-symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems, it is also important to be aware of the main concepts ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics. Our conclusion has far reaching consequences for the application of Green function methods, functional integrals, and generating functionals, which are at the heart of a large number of many-body methods. They cannot be transferred in their established forms to treatPT-symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum systems. It can be considered as an irony of fate that these methods are available only within the mathematical formalisms ofPT-symmetric and biorthogonal quantum mechanics.
我们回顾了从理论上处理宇称-时间(PT)对称的非厄米量子多体系统的方法。它们被实现为具有PT对称性且与环境耦合兼容的开放量子系统。PT对称的非厄米量子系统展现出各种引人入胜的性质,使其在一般的开放系统中脱颖而出。对后者的研究在量子理论中有悠久的历史。这些研究基于系统 - 库组合设置的厄米性,并由原子、分子和光学物理以及凝聚态物理领域发展而来。数学物理界对PT对称的非厄米系统的关注带来了新的视角以及PT对称和双正交量子力学优雅数学形式的发展,这些形式无需提及环境。在数学物理研究中,重点主要在于哈密顿量显著的谱性质以及相应单粒子本征态的特征。尽管哈密顿量是非厄米的,但它们可以呈现出所有本征值都是实数的参数区域。然而,为了研究凝聚态物理中涌现的量子多体现象并与实验建立联系,人们需要研究可观测量的期望值和关联函数。此外,还必须研究统计系综,而不仅仅是本征态。凝聚态物理领域部分人采用PT对称和双正交量子力学的概念导致了该方法处于有争议的状态。在诸如什么是合适的可观测量、期望值应如何计算以及什么是合适的平衡统计系综及其相应的密度矩阵等基本问题上没有达成共识。随着工程和控制开放量子多体系统的技术进步,现在是时候调和厄米观点与PT对称和双正交观点了。我们全面回顾了不同的方法,包括伪厄米性这个总体概念。为了推动我们在此倡导的厄米观点,我们主要关注辅助系统方法。它允许将非厄米系统嵌入到一个更大的厄米系统中。与其他技术(例如主方程)相比,它不依赖于任何近似。我们讨论了PT对称和双正交量子力学的特性。在这些理论中,被视为可观测量的东西取决于哈密顿量或所选的(双正交归一)基。此外,关键的是,被称为“期望值”的东西缺乏直接的概率解释,并且被视为规范密度矩阵的东西是非平稳且非厄米的。而且,时间演化的非幺正性隐藏在形式体系之中。我们选取了几个模型哈密顿量,它们到目前为止要么是从厄米观点进行研究,要么是从PT对称和双正交观点进行研究,然后在各自的替代框架内对它们进行研究。这包括一个简单的两能级单粒子问题以及一个展示量子临界行为的多体晶格模型。比较这两种计算结果表明,厄米方法虽然诚然在某些方面比较笨拙,但总是能得出物理上合理的结果。在极少数可以与实验数据进行比较的情况下,它们也与实验数据相符。相比之下,数学上优雅的PT对称和双正交方法得出的结果部分在物理上难以解释。因此我们得出结论,应该采用厄米方法。然而,为了充分理解PT对称的非厄米量子多体系统的物理,了解PT对称和双正交量子力学的主要概念也很重要。我们的结论对格林函数方法、泛函积分和生成泛函的应用有着深远的影响,而这些是大量多体方法的核心。它们不能以其既定形式直接用于处理PT对称的非厄米量子系统。可以说命运弄人的是,这些方法仅在PT对称和双正交量子力学的数学形式体系中可用。