• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Physical Properties of Three Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers: An In-Vitro Study.三种树脂类根管封闭剂物理性能的比较:一项体外研究
Front Dent. 2023 Sep 19;20:34. doi: 10.18502/fid.v20i34.13651. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparison of the Antibacterial Effect of AH26, Adseal and Beta RCS Root Canal Sealers against , an Study.AH26、Adseal和Beta RCS根管封闭剂对[具体细菌名称未给出]抗菌效果的比较:一项[具体研究类型未给出]研究
Front Dent. 2024 Feb 1;21:5. doi: 10.18502/fid.v21i5.14853. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of the apical seal obtained by Adseal, Proseal, and AH26 sealers in root canal obturation with lateral compaction technique.采用侧向加压技术进行根管充填时,Adseal、Proseal和AH26封闭剂根尖封闭效果的比较。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Aug 28;20:94. eCollection 2023.
4
Physical Properties and Chemical Characterization of Two Experimental Epoxy Resin Root Canal Sealers.两种实验性环氧树脂根管封闭剂的物理性质和化学特性
Iran Endod J. 2017 Spring;12(2):149-156. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.30.
5
Thermal, chemical and physical analysis of VDW.1Seal, Fill Root ST, and ADseal root canal sealers.VDW.1Seal、Fill Root ST 和 ADseal 根管封闭剂的热、化学和物理分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 8;13(1):14829. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41798-8.
6
Biological and physico-chemical properties of new root canal sealers.新型根管封闭剂的生物学和物理化学性质
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Feb 1;10(2):e120-e126. doi: 10.4317/jced.54548. eCollection 2018 Feb.
7
In vitro evaluation of a newly produced resin-based endodontic sealer.一种新生产的树脂基根管封闭剂的体外评价
Restor Dent Endod. 2016 Aug;41(3):189-95. doi: 10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.189. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Material Properties of a Tricalcium Silicate-containing, a Mineral Trioxide Aggregate-containing, and an Epoxy Resin-based Root Canal Sealer.含硅酸三钙、含矿物三氧化物凝聚体和环氧树脂基根管封闭剂的材料性能
J Endod. 2016 Dec;42(12):1784-1788. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.018. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
9
Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers.5种根管封闭剂的物理性能
J Endod. 2013 Oct;39(10):1281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
10
Heating stability, physical and chemical analysis of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的加热稳定性及理化分析。
Int Endod J. 2021 Jul;54(7):1175-1188. doi: 10.1111/iej.13496. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Genotoxicity of root canal sealers: a literature review.根管封闭剂的遗传毒性:文献综述。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Oct;24(10):3347-3362. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03478-z. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
2
Evaluation of the film thickness and antibacterial property of mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with propylene glycol as a root canal sealer.评估与丙二醇混合作为根管封闭剂的三氧化矿物凝聚体的膜厚度和抗菌性能。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020 Mar 17;17(2):142-146. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
3
BioRoot RCS Extracts Modulate the Early Mechanisms of Periodontal Inflammation and Regeneration.BioRoot RCS 提取物调节牙周炎炎症和再生的早期机制。
J Endod. 2019 Aug;45(8):1016-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
4
Do in vitro solubility studies on endodontic sealers demonstrate a high level of evidence? A systematic review.在根管封闭剂的体外溶解度研究中是否能证明高水平的证据?系统评价。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 May;77(4):253-263. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1538535. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
5
Experimental Sealers Containing Metal Methacrylates: Physical and Biological Properties.含金属甲基丙烯酸酯的实验性密封剂:物理和生物学性能。
J Endod. 2017 Oct;43(10):1725-1729. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
6
Physical Properties and Chemical Characterization of Two Experimental Epoxy Resin Root Canal Sealers.两种实验性环氧树脂根管封闭剂的物理性质和化学特性
Iran Endod J. 2017 Spring;12(2):149-156. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.30.
7
Physicochemical Properties of Epoxy Resin-Based and Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers.基于环氧树脂和生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂的物理化学性质
Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2017;2017:2582849. doi: 10.1155/2017/2582849. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
8
In vitro evaluation of a newly produced resin-based endodontic sealer.一种新生产的树脂基根管封闭剂的体外评价
Restor Dent Endod. 2016 Aug;41(3):189-95. doi: 10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.189. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
9
Dissolution, dislocation and dimensional changes of endodontic sealers after a solubility challenge: a micro-CT approach.溶解度挑战后根管封闭剂的溶解、脱位及尺寸变化:微计算机断层扫描法
Int Endod J. 2017 Apr;50(4):407-414. doi: 10.1111/iej.12636. Epub 2016 Apr 17.
10
Comparison of the rheological properties of four root canal sealers.四种根管封闭剂的流变学特性比较
Int J Oral Sci. 2015 Mar 23;7(1):56-61. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2014.33.

三种树脂类根管封闭剂物理性能的比较:一项体外研究

Comparison of the Physical Properties of Three Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers: An In-Vitro Study.

作者信息

Sarraf Pegah, Ghabraei Sholeh, Mohammadi Zahra, Noori Faranak, Chitsaz Nazanin

机构信息

Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Front Dent. 2023 Sep 19;20:34. doi: 10.18502/fid.v20i34.13651. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.18502/fid.v20i34.13651
PMID:37876790
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10591020/
Abstract

This in-vitro study aimed to evaluate the physical properties of three resin-based root canal sealers, including BETA-RCS, AH26, and Adseal. Flowability, film-thickness, solubility, and radiopacity of BETA-RCS, AH26, and Adseal sealers were evaluated according to ISO 6876/2012 specifications. Three samples of each sealer were used to test each of the properties. The results revealed that the flow rate (mm) of BETA-RCS, Adseal, and AH26 were 23.06±1.58, 22.5±4.23, and 21.85±1.71, respectively. Film-thickness values (µm) for BETA-RCS, Adseal, and AH26 sealers were 52.33±2.51, 18.66±0.57, and 52±2, respectively. No significant difference was observed regarding film-thickness between AH26 and BETA-RCS (P>0.05), while Adseal showed significantly lower film-thickness (P˂0.05). The highest and lowest solubility were related to BETA-RCS and Adseal, respectively. However, all sealers had acceptable solubility and radiopacity. The findings of the current study suggested that all three root canal sealers including BETA-RCS, AH26, and Adseal had similar properties based on ISO 6876 standard criteria. As such, they could be viable choices for facilitating effective root canal procedures. Further long-term clinical studies are warranted to assess their performance and success rates in actual endodontic cases.

摘要

这项体外研究旨在评估三种树脂基根管封闭剂的物理性能,包括BETA-RCS、AH26和Adseal。根据ISO 6876/2012规范对BETA-RCS、AH26和Adseal封闭剂的流动性、薄膜厚度、溶解度和射线不透性进行了评估。每种封闭剂使用三个样本测试每种性能。结果显示,BETA-RCS、Adseal和AH26的流速(毫米)分别为23.06±1.58、22.5±4.23和21.85±1.71。BETA-RCS、Adseal和AH26封闭剂的薄膜厚度值(微米)分别为52.33±2.51、18.66±0.57和52±2。AH26和BETA-RCS之间的薄膜厚度未观察到显著差异(P>0.05),而Adseal的薄膜厚度显著更低(P˂0.05)。最高和最低溶解度分别与BETA-RCS和Adseal相关。然而,所有封闭剂的溶解度和射线不透性均可接受。本研究结果表明,根据ISO 6876标准,包括BETA-RCS、AH26和Adseal在内的所有三种根管封闭剂具有相似的性能。因此,它们可能是促进有效根管治疗程序的可行选择。有必要进行进一步的长期临床研究,以评估它们在实际牙髓病病例中的性能和成功率。