• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种实验性环氧树脂根管封闭剂的物理性质和化学特性

Physical Properties and Chemical Characterization of Two Experimental Epoxy Resin Root Canal Sealers.

作者信息

Ashraf Hengameh, Najafi Farhood, Heidari Soolmaz, Mohammadian Manijeh, Zadsirjan Saeede

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Resin and Adhesives, Institute for Color Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran Endod J. 2017 Spring;12(2):149-156. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.30.

DOI:10.22037/iej.2017.30
PMID:28512477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5431716/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the setting time, flow, film thickness, solubility, radiopacity and characterization analysis of three epoxy resin based sealers including two experimental sealers and AH-26.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five samples of each material were evaluated for setting time, flow, film thickness, solubility and radiopacity according to ISO 6876 Standard. Characterization of sealers was performed under the scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Statistical evaluation was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

In this study, AH-26 showed more radiopacity and flow compared to two other experimental sealers (<0.05). However, both sealers had lower setting time than AH-26 (<0.05). No statistical differences were found regarding film thickness, solubility and radiopacity (>0.05). The characterization analysis exhibited relatively similar microstructure of AH-26 sealer to the experimental root canal sealers.

CONCLUSION

According to the result of this study, all tested root canal sealers had acceptable properties based on ISO 6876 standard criteria.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在评估三种基于环氧树脂的封闭剂的凝固时间、流动性、薄膜厚度、溶解性、射线不透性及特性分析,其中包括两种实验性封闭剂和AH - 26。

方法与材料

根据ISO 6876标准,对每种材料的五个样本进行凝固时间、流动性、薄膜厚度、溶解性和射线不透性评估。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、X射线能量色散光谱、X射线衍射(XRD)和傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱下对封闭剂进行特性分析。使用Kruskal - Wallis检验进行统计学评估。

结果

在本研究中,与其他两种实验性封闭剂相比,AH - 26显示出更高的射线不透性和流动性(<0.05)。然而,两种实验性封闭剂的凝固时间均比AH - 26短(<0.05)。在薄膜厚度、溶解性和射线不透性方面未发现统计学差异(>0.05)。特性分析显示AH - 26封闭剂与实验性根管封闭剂的微观结构相对相似。

结论

根据本研究结果,所有测试的根管封闭剂基于ISO 6876标准标准均具有可接受的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e136/5431716/ba495b639696/iej-12-149-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e136/5431716/17063d9641a0/iej-12-149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e136/5431716/918d099dca64/iej-12-149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e136/5431716/ba495b639696/iej-12-149-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e136/5431716/17063d9641a0/iej-12-149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e136/5431716/918d099dca64/iej-12-149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e136/5431716/ba495b639696/iej-12-149-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Physical Properties and Chemical Characterization of Two Experimental Epoxy Resin Root Canal Sealers.两种实验性环氧树脂根管封闭剂的物理性质和化学特性
Iran Endod J. 2017 Spring;12(2):149-156. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.30.
2
Chemical characterization and bioactivity of epoxy resin and Portland cement-based sealers with niobium and zirconium oxide radiopacifiers.含铌和氧化锆射线阻射剂的环氧树脂和波特兰水泥基封口剂的化学特性及生物活性研究。
Dent Mater. 2014 Sep;30(9):1005-20. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
3
Characterisation and evaluation of physical properties of AH-Plus sealer with and without the incorporation of petasin, pachymic acid, curcumin and shilajit-an invitro study.含或不含扁柏脂素、羽扇豆酸、姜黄素和喜来芝的 AH-Plus 根管封闭剂物理性能的表征和评估——一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04108-w.
4
Experimental amine-epoxide sealer: a physicochemical study in comparison with AH Plus and EasySeal.实验性胺-环氧化物封闭剂:与AH Plus和EasySeal的物理化学研究对比
Int Endod J. 2015 Aug;48(8):747-56. doi: 10.1111/iej.12372. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
5
Heating stability, physical and chemical analysis of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的加热稳定性及理化分析。
Int Endod J. 2021 Jul;54(7):1175-1188. doi: 10.1111/iej.13496. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
6
Physicochemical Changes in Root-Canal Sealers under Thermal Challenge: A Comparative Analysis of Calcium Silicate- and Epoxy-Resin-Based Sealers.热挑战下根管封闭剂的物理化学变化:硅酸钙基和环氧树脂基封闭剂的对比分析
Materials (Basel). 2024 Apr 22;17(8):1932. doi: 10.3390/ma17081932.
7
Characterization and Assessment of Physical Properties of 3 Single Syringe Hydraulic Cement-based Sealers.3 种单支注射器水基根管封闭剂的物理性能评价与表征
J Endod. 2024 Mar;50(3):381-388. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Jan 14.
8
Interface of dentine to root canal sealers.牙本质与根管封闭剂的界面。
J Dent. 2014 Mar;42(3):336-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.013. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
9
Comparison of the Physical Properties of Three Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers: An In-Vitro Study.三种树脂类根管封闭剂物理性能的比较:一项体外研究
Front Dent. 2023 Sep 19;20:34. doi: 10.18502/fid.v20i34.13651. eCollection 2023.
10
Physico-chemical investigation of endodontic sealers exposed to simulated intracanal heat application: epoxy resins and zinc oxide-eugenols.根管封闭剂在模拟根管内加热应用下的理化性质研究:环氧树脂和氧化锌丁香酚。
Int Endod J. 2020 May;53(5):690-697. doi: 10.1111/iej.13267. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical, chemical and biological properties of MTA Angelus and novel AGM MTA: an in vitro analysis.MTA Angelus和新型AGM MTA的物理、化学和生物学特性:一项体外分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05517-1.
2
Effect of an Experimental Resin-based Sealer (Resil) and AH-26 on Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.一种实验性树脂类封闭剂(Resil)和AH-26对术后疼痛的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
Iran Endod J. 2024;19(3):139-147. doi: 10.22037/iej.v19i3.44301.
3
Comparison of the Physical Properties of Three Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers: An In-Vitro Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Canal Dryness on Bond Strength of Bioceramic and Epoxy-resin Sealers after Irrigation with Sodium Hypochlorite or Chlorhexidine.次氯酸钠或氯己定冲洗后根管干燥对生物陶瓷和环氧树脂封闭剂粘结强度的影响
Iran Endod J. 2016 Spring;11(2):129-33. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 20.
2
Microleakage of Single-Cone Gutta-Percha Obturation Technique in Combination with Different Types of Sealers.单锥牙胶尖充填技术联合不同类型封闭剂的微渗漏
Iran Endod J. 2015 Summer;10(3):199-203. doi: 10.7508/iej.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
3
Influence of Irrigation Sequence on the Adhesion of Root Canal Sealers to Dentin: A Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Push-out Bond Strength Analysis.
三种树脂类根管封闭剂物理性能的比较:一项体外研究
Front Dent. 2023 Sep 19;20:34. doi: 10.18502/fid.v20i34.13651. eCollection 2023.
4
Characterisation of the Bioactivity and the Solubility of a New Root Canal Sealer.一种新型根管封闭剂的生物活性和溶解度的特性描述。
Int Dent J. 2023 Oct;73(5):760-769. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 May 25.
5
Influence of Adding Nanoparticles of Silver Vanadate on Antibacterial Effect and Physicochemical Properties of Endodontic Sealers.添加钒酸银纳米颗粒对根管封闭剂抗菌效果及理化性质的影响
Iran Endod J. 2019 Winter;14(1):7-13. doi: 10.22037/iej.v14i1.22519.
6
Evaluation of Selective Physicochemical and Biological Properties of Different Root Canal Sealers.不同根管封闭剂的选择性物理化学和生物学特性评估
Iran Endod J. 2019 Spring;14(2):126-132. doi: 10.22037/iej.v14i2.21666.
7
Evaluation of Chemical and Physical Properties of an Experimental Endodontic Sealer in Comparison with AH-26 and AH-Plus.与AH-26和AH-Plus相比,一种实验性根管封闭剂的化学和物理性能评估。
Iran Endod J. 2020 Summer;15(3):183-187. doi: 10.22037/iej.v15i3.29153.
8
Biocompatibility of an experimental endodontic sealer (Resil) in comparison with AH26 and AH-Plus in rats: An animal study.一种实验性牙髓封闭剂(Resil)与AH26和AH-Plus在大鼠体内的生物相容性比较:一项动物研究。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022 Spring;16(2):112-117. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2022.019. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
9
Endodontic Sealers Modified with Silver Vanadate: Antibacterial, Compositional, and Setting Time Evaluation.银钒酸改性牙胶密封剂的抗菌性能、组成和凝固时间评价。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 May 9;2019:4676354. doi: 10.1155/2019/4676354. eCollection 2019.
10
Physical Properties, Cytocompatibility and Sealability of HealApex (a Novel Premixed Biosealer).HealApex(一种新型预混生物封闭剂)的物理性质、细胞相容性及密封性
Iran Endod J. 2018 Summer;13(3):299-304. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i3.20188.
冲洗顺序对根管封闭剂与牙本质黏附力的影响:傅里叶变换红外光谱法及推出式黏结强度分析
J Endod. 2015 Jul;41(7):1108-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 May 23.
4
The effect of benzalkonium chloride additions to AH Plus sealer. Antimicrobial, physical and chemical properties.向AH Plus封闭剂中添加苯扎氯铵的效果。抗菌、物理和化学性质。
J Dent. 2015 Jul;43(7):846-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 13.
5
Cytotoxicity of two resin-based sealers and a fluoride varnish on human gingival fibroblasts.两种树脂类封闭剂和一种含氟涂料对人牙龈成纤维细胞的细胞毒性
Iran Endod J. 2015;10(2):89-92. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
6
Chemical characterization and bioactivity of epoxy resin and Portland cement-based sealers with niobium and zirconium oxide radiopacifiers.含铌和氧化锆射线阻射剂的环氧树脂和波特兰水泥基封口剂的化学特性及生物活性研究。
Dent Mater. 2014 Sep;30(9):1005-20. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
7
Chemical elements characterization of root canal sealers using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis.使用扫描电子显微镜和能量色散X射线分析对根管封闭剂进行化学元素表征。
Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014 Mar;13(1):27-34.
8
Comparison of AH26 Physicochemical Properties with Two AH26/Antibiotic Combinations.AH26的物理化学性质与两种AH26/抗生素组合的比较。
Iran Endod J. 2010 Winter;5(1):6-10. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
9
The microstructure and surface morphology of radiopaque tricalcium silicate cement exposed to different curing conditions.不同固化条件下放射显影硅酸三钙水泥的微观结构和表面形貌。
Dent Mater. 2012 May;28(5):584-95. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 Mar 11.
10
A four-week solubility assessment of AH-26 and four new root canal sealers.AH-26与四种新型根管封闭剂的四周溶解性评估
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Jan;9(1):31-5. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.92924.