Sehgal Megha, Ehlers Vanessa E, Moyer James R
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2023 Oct 9;17:1221176. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1221176. eCollection 2023.
New learning results in modulation of intrinsic plasticity in the underlying brain regions. Such changes in intrinsic plasticity can influence allocation and encoding of future memories such that new memories encoded during the period of enhanced excitability are linked to the original memory. The temporal window during which the two memories interact depends upon the time course of intrinsic plasticity following new learning.
Using the well-characterized lateral amygdala-dependent auditory fear conditioning as a behavioral paradigm, we investigated the time course of changes in intrinsic excitability within lateral amygdala neurons.
We found transient changes in the intrinsic excitability of amygdala neurons. Neuronal excitability was increased immediately following fear conditioning and persisted for up to 4 days post-learning but was back to naïve levels 10 days following fear conditioning. We also determined the relationship between learning-induced intrinsic and synaptic plasticity. Synaptic plasticity following fear conditioning was evident for up to 24 h but not 4 days later. Importantly, we demonstrated that the enhanced neuronal intrinsic excitability was evident in many of the same neurons that had undergone synaptic plasticity immediately following fear conditioning. Interestingly, such a correlation between synaptic and intrinsic plasticity following fear conditioning was no longer present 24 h post-learning.
These data demonstrate that intrinsic and synaptic changes following fear conditioning are transient and co-localized to the same neurons. Since intrinsic plasticity following fear conditioning is an important determinant for the allocation and consolidation of future amygdala-dependent memories, these findings establish a time course during which fear memories may influence each other.
新的学习会导致基础脑区内在可塑性的调节。内在可塑性的这种变化会影响未来记忆的分配和编码,使得在兴奋性增强期间编码的新记忆与原始记忆相关联。两种记忆相互作用的时间窗口取决于新学习后内在可塑性的时间进程。
我们使用特征明确的杏仁核外侧依赖型听觉恐惧条件反射作为行为范式,研究了杏仁核外侧神经元内在兴奋性变化的时间进程。
我们发现杏仁核神经元的内在兴奋性有短暂变化。恐惧条件反射后神经元兴奋性立即增加,并在学习后持续长达4天,但在恐惧条件反射后10天恢复到原始水平。我们还确定了学习诱导的内在可塑性和突触可塑性之间的关系。恐惧条件反射后的突触可塑性在长达24小时内明显,但4天后则不明显。重要的是,我们证明在恐惧条件反射后立即经历突触可塑性的许多相同神经元中,神经元内在兴奋性增强是明显的。有趣的是,恐惧条件反射后突触可塑性和内在可塑性之间的这种相关性在学习后24小时不再存在。
这些数据表明,恐惧条件反射后的内在和突触变化是短暂的,并且共定位在相同的神经元中。由于恐惧条件反射后的内在可塑性是未来杏仁核依赖型记忆分配和巩固的重要决定因素,这些发现确定了恐惧记忆可能相互影响的时间进程。