Suppr超能文献

小儿钝性脾外伤:处理和结局的差异。

Pediatric Blunt Splenic Trauma: Disparities in Management and Outcomes.

机构信息

Rutgers, RWJMS, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Rutgers, RWJMS, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2024 Feb;294:137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.09.036. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

While nonoperative management has become widely accepted, whether nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma is standardized across pediatric trauma centers and different racial groups warrants further investigation. Using the National Trauma Database, the purpose of this study was to quantify the differences in the management of pediatric splenic trauma across different pediatric trauma centers, with respect to injury severity, race, ethnicity, and insurance.

METHODS

Patients under 20 y of age with blunt splenic trauma reported to the 2018 and 2019 National Trauma Data Bank were identified. Primary outcomes were splenectomy, embolization, transfusion, mortality, injury severity score (ISS), and length of hospital stay (LOS) and length of intensive care unit stay. Continuous data and categorical data were analyzed using ANOVA and Chi-squared test, respectively. Nearest 1:1 neighbor matching was performed between minority patients and White patients. P < 0.05 for all comparative analyses was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the total cohort (n = 1919), 70.3% identified as White, while 21.6% identified as Black or Hispanic. The mortality rate was 0.3%. Among different race categories, the frequency of spleen embolization (P = 0.99), splenectomy (P = 0.99), blood transfusion (P = 1), and mortality (P = 1), were not significantly different. After controlling for ISS and age with propensity score matching, the mean hospital LOS remained significantly higher in minority patients, with a mean of 5.44 d compared to 4.72 d (P = 0.05). Mean length of intensive care unit stay was not significantly different after propensity matching, with a mean of 1.79 d and 1.56 spent in the ICU for minority and White patients respectively (P = 0.17). While propensity score matching preserved statistical significance, the ISS for the minority group remained 1.12 times higher than the ISS of the Caucasian group. There was no statistically significant difference among races with respect to different payment methods and insurance status, although Black and Hispanic patients were proportionally underinsured.

CONCLUSIONS

While minority patients had a relatively higher number of operative interventions and longer hospital and ICU stays, after propensity score matching, mean ISS remained higher in the minority group. Our findings suggest that injury severity is likely to influence the difference in LOS between the two groups. Furthermore, our data highlight how nonoperative management is not standardized across pediatric trauma centers.

摘要

简介

虽然非手术治疗已被广泛接受,但在不同的儿科创伤中心和不同种族群体中,是否对钝性脾外伤进行非手术治疗是否标准化仍有待进一步研究。本研究利用国家创伤数据库,旨在定量比较不同儿科创伤中心在脾外伤治疗方面的差异,包括损伤严重程度、种族、民族和保险。

方法

确定了报告至 2018 年和 2019 年国家创伤数据库的年龄在 20 岁以下的钝性脾外伤患者。主要结局为脾切除术、栓塞术、输血、死亡率、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和住院时间(LOS)和重症监护病房(ICU)停留时间。连续数据和分类数据分别采用方差分析和卡方检验进行分析。对少数民族患者和白人患者进行最近的 1:1 邻居匹配。所有比较分析 P<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

在总队列(n=1919)中,70.3%为白人,21.6%为黑人和西班牙裔。死亡率为 0.3%。在不同种族类别中,脾栓塞(P=0.99)、脾切除术(P=0.99)、输血(P=1)和死亡率(P=1)的频率无显著差异。在使用倾向评分匹配控制 ISS 和年龄后,少数民族患者的平均住院 LOS 仍然显著较高,平均为 5.44 天,而白人患者为 4.72 天(P=0.05)。在倾向匹配后,重症监护病房的平均住院时间没有显著差异,少数民族患者平均住院 1.79 天,白人患者平均住院 1.56 天(P=0.17)。虽然倾向评分匹配保留了统计学意义,但少数民族组的 ISS 仍比白人群体高 1.12 倍。在不同的支付方式和保险状况方面,种族之间没有统计学差异,尽管黑人和西班牙裔患者的保险比例较低。

结论

尽管少数民族患者的手术干预次数相对较多,住院和 ICU 时间较长,但在进行倾向评分匹配后,少数民族组的平均 ISS 仍然较高。我们的研究结果表明,损伤严重程度可能会影响两组之间 LOS 的差异。此外,我们的数据强调了非手术治疗在儿科创伤中心之间没有标准化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验