Suppr超能文献

治疗师在电子健康记录中实施新的腰痛文档记录实践的经验:一项访谈研究。

Therapists' experiences with implementing new documentation practices for low back pain in electronic health care records: an interview study.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg East, Denmark.

Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2023 Oct 26;16(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06567-w.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clinical practice is constantly changing with new guidelines being published, changes in patients' preferences but also by new qualitative requirements for therapists and institutional surveys on delivered care. Electronic health records (EHR) are used for all these purposes. We involved physiotherapists and occupational therapists in an intervention to change documentation practice in their electronic health record for low back pain (LBP) and later evaluated the feasibility of the new health records. The aim of the present study was to explore therapists' experiences working with the new EHR.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified thru interviews: (I) Facilitators and motivators towards implementation, (II) Changing routines as a group and (III) Obstacles against successful implementation. This study identifies a need for involving therapists and management for successful change of electronic health care records usage in municipalities. However, difficulties were encountered in meeting documentation of practice requirements and obtaining sufficient data quality in the EHR for data to be used for daily use, quality assessment and research. In this small descriptive study, developing an EHR that simultaneously serves treatment plans, quality assessment, and research purposes was not expressed being feasible. Further research in this area is needed.

摘要

目的

随着新指南的发布、患者偏好的变化以及对治疗师的新定性要求和机构护理评估的出现,临床实践不断变化。电子健康记录 (EHR) 可用于所有这些目的。我们让物理治疗师和职业治疗师参与了一项干预措施,以改变他们电子健康记录中针对腰痛 (LBP) 的文档记录实践,之后评估了新健康记录的可行性。本研究旨在探讨治疗师在使用新 EHR 时的体验。

结果

通过访谈确定了三个主题:(I)实施的促进因素和动机,(II)作为一个群体改变日常工作,(III)成功实施的障碍。这项研究表明,需要让治疗师和管理层参与进来,以成功改变电子医疗记录在市政当局中的使用方式。然而,在满足实践记录要求以及在 EHR 中获得足够的数据质量方面存在困难,无法将数据用于日常使用、质量评估和研究。在这项小型描述性研究中,开发一种同时服务于治疗计划、质量评估和研究目的的 EHR 被认为不可行。需要在该领域进行进一步的研究。

相似文献

6
Research-based evidence in stroke rehabilitation: an investigation of its implementation by physiotherapists and occupational therapists.
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Dec;38(26):2564-74. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1138550. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
8
Utilizing nursing standards in electronic health records: A descriptive qualitative study.
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Apr;184:105350. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105350. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of the use and challenges of electronic health records in physiotherapy practice.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 30;15(7):e097649. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097649.

本文引用的文献

3
Clinical Data Reuse or Secondary Use: Current Status and Potential Future Progress.
Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):38-52. doi: 10.15265/IY-2017-007. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
4
Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice From a Learning Perspective.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2017 Jun;14(3):192-199. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12212. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
7
The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1309-15. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204431. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
9
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验