• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

华盛顿州大麻合法化后,处境更不利社区的大麻药房集中度更高。

Higher Concentration of Marijuana Dispensaries in Neighborhoods with More Disadvantage Following Legalization in Washington.

作者信息

Williams Edwina, Trangenstein Pamela, Patterson Deidre, Kerr William

机构信息

Alcohol Research Group.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2023 Oct 5:rs.3.rs-3393457. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3393457/v1.

DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3393457/v1
PMID:37886567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10602076/
Abstract

Washington is one of 21 states that have legalized recreational marijuana resulting in neighborhoods that have experienced a change in physical environment with the emergence of dispensaries. This study examines the selection of dispensaries into disadvantage area, incorporating local policies and neighborhood characteristics. Marijuana and alcohol sales data were from the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board; and neighborhood characteristics were drawn from the American Community Survey 2010-2016 5-year estimates. Using factor analysis we created a neighborhood disadvantage index where census tracts were stratified into disadvantaged tertiles; and counties were stratified by urban/rural status. We examined the association between dispensaries, neighborhood characteristics, and local marijuana policies using Negative Binomial Regression with a natural log of land area as an offset, separately for 2014-2016. Dispensaries opened in high-disadvantaged CTs in 2014 and then dispersed across the state while retaining higher concentrations in disadvantaged urban CTs. Marijuana-specific policies (allotted dispensaries and retail cap) were found to be predictors of marijuana dispensary density. This study provides evidence that marijuana dispensaries were disproportionately located in areas with greater disadvantage. State and local marijuana policies emerged as important predictors, underscoring the importance of designing thoughtful and equitable license allocation procedures and policies.

摘要

华盛顿是21个将休闲用大麻合法化的州之一,这导致一些社区因大麻药房的出现而经历了物理环境的变化。本研究考察了大麻药房在弱势地区的选址情况,同时纳入了地方政策和社区特征。大麻和酒精销售数据来自华盛顿州酒类和大麻委员会;社区特征取自美国社区调查2010 - 2016年5年估计数据。我们使用因子分析创建了一个社区弱势指数,将普查区分为弱势三分位数;并按城市/农村状况对县进行分层。我们使用负二项回归,以土地面积的自然对数作为偏移量,分别对2014 - 2016年的数据进行分析,考察了大麻药房、社区特征和地方大麻政策之间的关联。2014年,大麻药房在高度弱势的普查区开业,随后在全州分散,但在弱势城市普查区仍保持较高的集中度。研究发现,特定于大麻的政策(分配的药房数量和零售上限)是大麻药房密度的预测因素。本研究提供的证据表明,大麻药房在弱势程度更高的地区分布不成比例。州和地方的大麻政策成为重要的预测因素,凸显了设计周全且公平的许可证分配程序和政策的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1712/10602076/9667454778dc/nihpp-rs3393457v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1712/10602076/9667454778dc/nihpp-rs3393457v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1712/10602076/9667454778dc/nihpp-rs3393457v1-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Higher Concentration of Marijuana Dispensaries in Neighborhoods with More Disadvantage Following Legalization in Washington.华盛顿州大麻合法化后,处境更不利社区的大麻药房集中度更高。
Res Sq. 2023 Oct 5:rs.3.rs-3393457. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3393457/v1.
2
Community-level policy responses to state marijuana legalization in Washington State.华盛顿州针对该州大麻合法化的社区层面政策应对措施。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Apr;42:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
3
The Associations of Neighborhood Availability of Marijuana Dispensaries and DATA-2000 Waivered Providers with Hospital Stays Related to Opioids.大麻药房和 DATA-2000 豁免提供者在社区可及性与与阿片类药物相关的住院治疗之间的关联。
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(14):2387-2399. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1650775. Epub 2019 Aug 25.
4
Location, location, location: Assessing the spatial patterning between marijuana licenses, alcohol outlets and neighborhood characteristics within Washington state.位置,位置,位置:评估华盛顿州大麻许可证、酒类销售点和社区特征之间的空间分布模式。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Apr 1;185:214-218. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
5
County-Level Recreational Marijuana Policies and Local Policy Changes in Colorado and Washington State (2012-2019).县级娱乐大麻政策与科罗拉多州和华盛顿州的地方政策变化(2012-2019)。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):1132-1161. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12535. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
6
Collisions and cannabis: Measuring the effect of recreational marijuana legalization on traffic crashes in Washington State.碰撞与大麻:评估华盛顿州娱乐大麻合法化对交通事故的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(7):527-535. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2220853. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
7
Availability of medical cannabis services by racial, social, and geographic characteristics of neighborhoods in New York: a cross-sectional study.纽约社区的种族、社会和地理特征对医疗大麻服务的可及性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13076-1.
8
Assessing the Retail Environments of Licensed and Unlicensed Cannabis Dispensaries: Adapting the Marijuana Retail Surveillance Tool to Inform Cannabis Regulation in Los Angeles County.评估持牌和无证大麻药房的零售环境:利用大麻零售监测工具为洛杉矶县的大麻监管提供信息。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(4):403-411. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001224.
9
Evaluating the Change in Medical Marijuana Dispensary Locations in Los Angeles Following the Passage of Local Legislation.评估洛杉矶地方立法通过后医用大麻药房位置的变化。
J Prim Prev. 2017 Jun;38(3):265-277. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0473-8.
10
Assessment of Incorporation of Lessons From Tobacco Control in City and County Laws Regulating Legal Marijuana in California.评估将烟草控制经验纳入加利福尼亚州规范合法大麻的市县法律的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208393. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8393.

本文引用的文献

1
Equity in Coverage of Local Cannabis Control Policies in California, 2020‒2021.2020-2021 年加利福尼亚州地方大麻管制政策覆盖的公平性。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Nov;112(11):1640-1650. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307041. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
2
Characteristics of the Washington cannabis market from 2014 to 2016.2014年至2016年华盛顿大麻市场的特征。
J Cannabis Res. 2022 Jul 4;4(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s42238-022-00147-8.
3
GEOGRAPHICAL ACCESS TO RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA.获得休闲用大麻的地理便利性。
Contemp Econ Policy. 2021 Oct;39(4):778-807. doi: 10.1111/coep.12518. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
4
Density of medical and recreational cannabis outlets: racial/ethnic differences in the associations with young adult intentions to use cannabis, e-cigarettes, and cannabis mixed with tobacco/nicotine.医用和娱乐用大麻销售点的密度:与年轻成年人使用大麻、电子烟以及大麻与烟草/尼古丁混合制品意愿之间关联的种族/族裔差异。
J Cannabis Res. 2021 Jul 9;3(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s42238-021-00084-y.
5
Price Changes in Washington Following the 2012 Liquor Privatization: An Update Through 2016 With Comparisons to California, Idaho, and Oregon.华盛顿州 2012 年酒类专卖改革后的价格变化:2016 年更新数据及与加利福尼亚州、爱达荷州和俄勒冈州的比较。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Feb;44(2):501-510. doi: 10.1111/acer.14255. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
6
Availability of licensed cannabis businesses in relation to area deprivation in Washington state: A spatiotemporal analysis of cannabis business presence between 2014 and 2017.华盛顿州与地区贫困相关的持牌大麻企业的供应情况:2014 年至 2017 年大麻企业存在的时空分析。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019 Nov;38(7):790-797. doi: 10.1111/dar.12987. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
7
Subgroup trends in alcohol and cannabis co-use and related harms during the rollout of recreational cannabis legalization in Washington state.华盛顿州娱乐用大麻合法化实施期间,酒精和大麻共同使用及其相关危害的亚组趋势。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Jan;75. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
8
Post-Legalization Opening of Retail Cannabis Stores and Adult Cannabis Use in Washington State, 2009-2016.2009-2016 年华盛顿州零售大麻店合法化后开业与成年人大麻使用情况
Am J Public Health. 2019 Sep;109(9):1294-1301. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305191. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
9
Using Zoning as a Public Health Tool to Reduce Oversaturation of Alcohol Outlets: an Examination of the Effects of the New "300 Foot Rule" on Packaged Goods Stores in a Mid-Atlantic City.利用分区规划作为公共卫生工具,减少酒类销售点过度饱和:新“300 英尺规则”对大西洋中部城市包装商品店的影响研究。
Prev Sci. 2019 Aug;20(6):833-843. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0947-9.
10
Changes in Marijuana Use Across the 2012 Washington State Recreational Legalization: Is Retrospective Assessment of Use Before Legalization More Accurate?2012 年华盛顿州娱乐用大麻合法化前后大麻使用情况的变化:在合法化之前对使用情况进行回顾性评估是否更准确?
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 May;79(3):495-502. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.495.