Suppr超能文献

2020-2021 年加利福尼亚州地方大麻管制政策覆盖的公平性。

Equity in Coverage of Local Cannabis Control Policies in California, 2020‒2021.

机构信息

Ellicott C. Matthay is with the Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY. Leyla M. Mousli is with the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. Cynthia Fu, Serena Zhang, and Dorie E. Apollonio are with the School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco. William R. Ponicki and Paul Gruenewald are with the Prevention Research Center, Berkeley, CA. Laura A. Schmidt is with the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies and the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2022 Nov;112(11):1640-1650. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307041. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

Abstract

To assess whether cannabis control policies that may protect public health were adopted evenly across California localities with differing sociodemographic compositions. From November 2020 to January 2021, we measured cannabis control policies for 241 localities across California and linked them to data on the characteristics of the communities affected by these policies. We evaluated whether disadvantaged communities were more likely to allow cannabis businesses and less likely to be covered by policies designed to protect public health. Localities with all-out bans on cannabis businesses (65% of localities) were disproportionately high-education (55.8% vs 50.5% with any college) and low-poverty (24.3% vs 34.2%), with fewer Black (4.4% vs 6.9%) and Latinx (45.6% vs 50.3%) residents. Among localities that allowed retail cannabis businesses (28%), there were more cannabis control policies in localities with more high-income and Black residents, although the specific policies varied. Cannabis control policies are unequally distributed across California localities. If these policies protect health, inequities may be exacerbated. Uniform adoption of recommended cannabis control policies may help limit any inequitable health impacts of cannabis legalization. (. 2022;112(11):1640-1650. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307041).

摘要

为评估加利福尼亚各地在采用可能保护公众健康的大麻管制政策时是否存在差异,这些政策在社会人口构成不同的地区的实施情况是否存在差异。2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 1 月,我们测量了加利福尼亚 241 个地区的大麻管制政策,并将其与受这些政策影响的社区特征数据相关联。我们评估了弱势社区是否更有可能允许大麻企业存在,而不太可能受到旨在保护公众健康的政策的影响。完全禁止大麻企业的地区(占 65%)的教育程度较高(55.8% 与任何大学相比为 50.5%),贫困程度较低(24.3% 与 34.2%),黑人(4.4% 与 6.9%)和拉丁裔(45.6% 与 50.3%)居民较少。在允许零售大麻企业的地区(占 28%)中,高收入和黑人居民较多的地区有更多的大麻管制政策,尽管具体政策有所不同。大麻管制政策在加利福尼亚各地的分布不均。如果这些政策能保护健康,不平等可能会加剧。统一采用建议的大麻管制政策可能有助于限制大麻合法化对健康造成的任何不公平影响。(2022;112(11):1640-1650。https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307041)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验