Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; Center for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA.
Am J Infect Control. 2023 Nov;51(11S):A64-A71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.02.004.
Staphylococcus aureus colonization is a key risk factor for S. aureus infections in surgical patients and in hospitalized patients. Many studies have assessed various decolonization agents, protocols, and settings. This review summarizes key findings about nasal decolonization for 2 different patient populations: patients undergoing surgery and patients hospitalized in intensive care units.
We reviewed major studies related to decolonization of patients colonized with S. aureus and who were either undergoing surgical procedures or were hospitalized in intensive care units. We focused on recent studies, particularly randomized controlled trials and robust quasi-experimental trials. We also reviewed select non-randomized trials when more rigorous trials were limited.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Mupirocin is the best-studied agent for decolonization. Its use reduces the risk of surgical site infection following orthopedic surgery (strongest data) and cardiac surgery. Mupirocin decolonization also reduces the incidence of S. aureus clinical cultures in the intensive care unit. Povidone-iodine is less well-studied. Current data suggest that it decreases the risk of surgical site infections after orthopedic surgical procedures. In contrast, povidone-iodine is less effective than mupirocin for reducing the incidence of S aureus clinical cultures in the intensive care unit. Both mupirocin and povidone-iodine have important limitations, highlighting the need for future decolonization research.
金黄色葡萄球菌定植是手术患者和住院患者金黄色葡萄球菌感染的关键危险因素。许多研究评估了各种去定植剂、方案和环境。本综述总结了针对 2 种不同患者群体(接受手术的患者和重症监护病房住院患者)的鼻腔去定植的关键发现。
我们回顾了与金黄色葡萄球菌定植患者去定植相关的主要研究,这些患者要么正在接受手术,要么在重症监护病房住院。我们专注于最近的研究,特别是随机对照试验和稳健的准实验性试验。当更严格的试验有限时,我们还审查了一些非随机试验。
讨论/结论:莫匹罗星是研究最充分的去定植剂。其使用可降低骨科手术后(最强数据)和心脏手术后手术部位感染的风险。莫匹罗星去定植还可降低重症监护病房金黄色葡萄球菌临床培养物的发生率。聚维酮碘研究较少。现有数据表明,它可降低骨科手术术后手术部位感染的风险。相比之下,聚维酮碘对降低重症监护病房金黄色葡萄球菌临床培养物的发生率不如莫匹罗星有效。莫匹罗星和聚维酮碘都有重要的局限性,这突显了未来去定植研究的必要性。