Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Blalock 618, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):922-930. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10479-y. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
A novel 6-item objective, procedure-specific assessment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy incorporating the critical view of safety (LC-CVS OPSA) was developed to support trainee formative and summative assessments. The LC-CVS OPSA included two retraction items (fundus and infundibulum retraction) and four CVS items (hepatocystic triangle visualization, gallbladder-liver separation, cystic artery identification, and cystic duct identification). The scoring rubric for retraction consisted of poor (frequently outside of defined range), adequate (minimally outside of defined range) and excellent (consistently inside defined range) and for CVS items were "poor-unsafe", "adequate-safe", or "excellent-safe".
A multi-national consortium of 12 expert LC surgeons applied the OPSA-LC CVS to 35 unique LC videos and one duplicate video. Primary outcome measure was inter-rater reliability as measured by Gwet's AC, a weighted measure that adjusts for scales with high probability of random agreement. Analysis of the inter-rater reliability was conducted on a collapsed dichotomous scoring rubric of "poor-unsafe" vs. "adequate/excellent-safe".
Inter-rater reliability was high for all six items ranging from 0.76 (hepatocystic triangle visualization) to 0.86 (cystic duct identification). Intra-rater reliability for the single duplicate video was substantially higher across the six items ranging from 0.91 to 1.00.
The novel 6-item OPSA LC CVS demonstrated high inter-rater reliability when tested with a multi-national consortium of LC expert surgeons. This brief instrument focused on safe surgical practice was designed to support the implementation of entrustable professional activities into busy surgical training programs. Instrument use coupled with video-based assessments creates novel datasets with the potential for artificial intelligence development including computer vision to drive assessment automation.
为了支持学员的形成性和总结性评估,开发了一种新的 6 项针对腹腔镜胆囊切除术的客观、特定程序评估,其中纳入了安全关键视图(LC-CVS OPSA)。LC-CVS OPSA 包括两个牵开项目(底和漏斗部牵开)和四个 CVS 项目(肝胆囊三角可视化、胆囊-肝脏分离、胆囊动脉识别和胆囊管识别)。牵开项目的评分标准包括差(经常超出定义范围)、尚可(轻微超出定义范围)和优(始终在定义范围内),CVS 项目的评分标准为“差-不安全”、“尚可-安全”或“优-安全”。
一个由 12 名腹腔镜胆囊切除术专家组成的多国联盟,对 35 个独特的腹腔镜胆囊切除术视频和一个重复视频应用了 OPSA-LC CVS。主要的观察指标是由 Gwet 的 AC 衡量的组间可靠性,这是一种加权测量方法,可根据高随机一致性概率的量表进行调整。对“差-不安全”与“尚可/优-安全”的简化二分评分标准进行了组间可靠性分析。
所有 6 项评分的组间可靠性都很高,范围从 0.76(肝胆囊三角可视化)到 0.86(胆囊管识别)。在 6 项评分中,对单一重复视频的单个观察者可靠性要高得多,范围从 0.91 到 1.00。
当由腹腔镜胆囊切除术专家的多国联盟进行测试时,新型 6 项 OPSA LC CVS 显示出了很高的组间可靠性。这种关注安全手术实践的简短仪器旨在支持可委托的专业活动在繁忙的外科培训计划中的实施。仪器使用与基于视频的评估相结合,创建了具有潜在人工智能开发能力的新型数据集,包括计算机视觉,以推动评估自动化。