Heck Katrin, Kunzelmann Karl-Heinz, Walter Elias, Kaisarly Dalia, Hoffmann Lea, Litzenburger Friederike
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 19;13(20):3257. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203257.
This in vitro study aimed to investigate the diagnostic potential of short-wave infrared transillumination (SWIRT) at 1050, 1200 and 1300 nm for the detection of proximal caries in molars and premolars. It was compared to the diagnostic performance of bitewing radiography (BWR) and micro-computed tomography (µCT) as the reference standard. 250 sound or decayed proximal surfaces of permanent posterior extracted teeth were examined using (1) SWIRT at 1050, 1200 and 1300 nm with two camera systems of different resolutions, (2) BWR and (3) µCT. Thresholds were defined for both test methods and the reference standard for caries in general, enamel caries and dentin caries. All images were assessed by two examiners twice, at an interval of two weeks. SWIRT at wavelengths of 1050, 1200 and 1300 nm achieved sensitivity values more than 2.5 times higher than BWR (enamel caries 3.2-4.4 times; dentin caries 3.25-4.25 times) for the detection of proximal caries. Sensitivity values of SWIRT improved with the higher wavelength. No significant difference was found in diagnostic quality between the two camera systems. SWIRT at 1300 nm imaged proximal enamel caries with the highest accuracy, while the physical optimum for transillumination in dentin was located at a lower wavelength (<1000 nm).
这项体外研究旨在探究1050、1200和1300纳米波长的短波红外透照(SWIRT)技术在检测磨牙和前磨牙邻面龋方面的诊断潜力。将其与咬合翼片X线摄影(BWR)和微计算机断层扫描(µCT)作为参考标准的诊断性能进行比较。使用(1)1050、1200和1300纳米波长的SWIRT以及两种不同分辨率的摄像系统、(2)BWR和(3)µCT对250个恒牙后牙拔除牙的健康或龋坏邻面进行检查。针对两种检测方法以及龋病、釉质龋和牙本质龋的参考标准都定义了阈值。所有图像由两名检查人员分两次评估,间隔两周。在检测邻面龋方面,1050、1200和1300纳米波长的SWIRT的敏感度值比BWR高出2.5倍以上(釉质龋为3.2 - 4.4倍;牙本质龋为3.25 - 4.25倍)。SWIRT的敏感度值随波长增加而提高。两种摄像系统的诊断质量未发现显著差异。1300纳米波长的SWIRT对邻面釉质龋成像的准确性最高,而牙本质透照的物理最佳波长位于较低波长(<1000纳米)。