Liu Alexander, Hammond Robert, Chan Kenneth, Chukwuenweniwe Chukwugozie, Johnson Rebecca, Khair Duaa, Duck Eleanor, Olubodun Oluwaseun, Barwick Kristian, Banya Winston, Stirrup James, Donnelly Peter D, Kaski Juan Carlos, Coates Anthony R M
School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TF, UK.
Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading RG1 5AN, UK.
Biomedicines. 2023 Oct 18;11(10):2819. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102819.
The ferritin-lymphocyte ratio (FLR) is a novel inflammatory biomarker for the assessment of acute COVID-19 patients. However, the prognostic value of FLR for predicting adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 remains unclear, which hinders its clinical translation. We characterised the prognostic value of FLR in COVID-19 patients, as compared to established inflammatory markers. In 217 study patients (69 years [IQR: 55-82]; 60% males), FLR was weakly correlated with CRP (R = 0.108, = 0.115) and white cell count (R = -0.144; = 0.034). On ROC analysis, an FLR cut-off of 286 achieved a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 30% for predicting inpatient mortality (AUC 0.60, 95% CI: 0.53-0.67). The negative predictive values of FLR for ruling out mortality, non-invasive ventilation requirement and critical illness (intubation and/or ICU admission) were 86%, 85% and 93%, respectively. FLR performed similarly to CRP (AUC 0.60 vs. 0.64; = 0.375) for predicting mortality, but worse than CRP for predicting non-fatal outcomes (all < 0.05). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, COVID-19 patients with FLR values > 286 had worse inpatient survival than patients with FLR ≤ 286, = 0.041. FLR has prognostic value in COVID-19 patients, and appears unrelated to other inflammatory markers such as CRP and WCC. FLR exhibits high sensitivity and negative predictive values for adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19, and may be a good "rule-out" test. Further work is needed to improve the sensitivity of FLR and validate its role in prospective studies for guiding clinical management.
铁蛋白-淋巴细胞比值(FLR)是一种用于评估急性新冠肺炎患者的新型炎症生物标志物。然而,FLR对预测新冠肺炎不良临床结局的预后价值仍不明确,这阻碍了其临床应用。我们将FLR与已确立的炎症标志物进行比较,以明确其在新冠肺炎患者中的预后价值。在217例研究患者中(年龄69岁[四分位间距:55-82];60%为男性),FLR与CRP(R = 0.108,P = 0.115)和白细胞计数(R = -0.144;P = 0.034)呈弱相关。在ROC分析中,FLR临界值为286时,预测住院患者死亡率的灵敏度为86%,特异度为30%(AUC 0.60,95%CI:0.53-0.67)。FLR排除死亡率、无创通气需求和危重症(插管和/或入住ICU)的阴性预测值分别为86%、85%和93%。在预测死亡率方面,FLR的表现与CRP相似(AUC 0.60对0.64;P = 0.375),但在预测非致命结局方面比CRP差(所有P<0.05)。根据Kaplan-Meier分析,FLR值>286的新冠肺炎患者住院生存率低于FLR≤286的患者,P = 0.041。FLR在新冠肺炎患者中具有预后价值,且似乎与CRP和WCC等其他炎症标志物无关。FLR对新冠肺炎不良临床结局具有高灵敏度和阴性预测值,可能是一种良好的“排除”检测方法。需要进一步开展工作以提高FLR的灵敏度,并在前瞻性研究中验证其在指导临床管理方面的作用。