• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估食品系统中的领导能力:议题领导量表。

Assessing Leadership Capacity in the Food System: The Issue Leadership Scale.

作者信息

Lamm Kevan W

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30606, USA.

出版信息

Foods. 2023 Oct 12;12(20):3746. doi: 10.3390/foods12203746.

DOI:10.3390/foods12203746
PMID:37893638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10606580/
Abstract

The food system represents a complex, interrelated, and interdependent network of individuals and organizations. Despite the unique characteristics of the food system domain, there has never been a comprehensive analysis of leadership capacity amongst food system professionals. The present study provides an empirical assessment of food system leadership capacity using many leadership instruments. The study included pilot ( = 125) and primary ( = 4185) data collection across 27 food system-related leadership development programs. The results validate the Issue Leadership scale, which comprises seven capacity areas: action, change, communication, critical thinking, strategic planning and visioning, interpersonal traits and characteristics, leadership process, and leadership skills. The Issue Leadership scale captures both perception of importance and current skill level. The study results indicate that food system professionals perceived communication and critical thinking, strategic planning and visioning as the most important leadership capacity areas. Furthermore, respondents indicated the highest level of self-perceived skill in critical thinking, strategic planning and visioning, and interpersonal traits and characteristics. Overall, respondents had higher perceived importance levels ( = 4.17) than skill ( = 3.44), indicating the need for additional leadership capacity development amongst food system professionals. Respondents also indicated similar levels of opinion leadership ( = 3.92), servant leadership ( = 3.82), transformational leadership ( = 3.78), and transactional leadership ( = 3.70), providing an additional empirical assessment of food system professional leadership capacity.

摘要

食品系统代表了一个由个人和组织构成的复杂、相互关联且相互依存的网络。尽管食品系统领域具有独特特征,但从未有过对食品系统专业人员领导能力的全面分析。本研究使用多种领导力工具对食品系统领导能力进行了实证评估。该研究包括在27个与食品系统相关的领导力发展项目中进行的试点数据收集((n = 125))和主要数据收集((n = 4185))。研究结果验证了问题领导力量表,该量表包括七个能力领域:行动、变革、沟通、批判性思维、战略规划与愿景、人际特质与特征、领导过程和领导技能。问题领导力量表既体现了对重要性的认知,也反映了当前的技能水平。研究结果表明,食品系统专业人员认为沟通、批判性思维、战略规划与愿景是最重要的领导能力领域。此外,受访者表示在批判性思维、战略规划与愿景以及人际特质与特征方面的自我认知技能水平最高。总体而言,受访者对重要性的认知水平((M = 4.17))高于技能水平((M = 3.44)),这表明食品系统专业人员需要进一步发展领导能力。受访者还表示在意见领导力((M = 3.92))、服务型领导力((M = 3.82))、变革型领导力((M = 3.78))和交易型领导力((M = 3.70))方面的水平相似,这为食品系统专业人员的领导能力提供了额外的实证评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a7/10606580/f5d6946a39a4/foods-12-03746-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a7/10606580/ef703778c425/foods-12-03746-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a7/10606580/f5d6946a39a4/foods-12-03746-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a7/10606580/ef703778c425/foods-12-03746-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a7/10606580/f5d6946a39a4/foods-12-03746-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Leadership Capacity in the Food System: The Issue Leadership Scale.评估食品系统中的领导能力:议题领导量表。
Foods. 2023 Oct 12;12(20):3746. doi: 10.3390/foods12203746.
2
Issue Leadership: Establishing a Domain for a Food Systems Leadership Model.问题领导力:为食品系统领导力模型确立一个领域。
Foods. 2023 Jul 4;12(13):2598. doi: 10.3390/foods12132598.
3
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
4
The need for strong clinical leaders - Transformational and transactional leadership as a framework for resident leadership training.对强大临床领导者的需求——变革型领导与交易型领导作为住院医师领导力培训的框架
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 25;12(8):e0183019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183019. eCollection 2017.
5
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
6
Using an employee resource group to develop GRIT in female healthcare leaders: a case study.利用员工资源小组培养女性医疗保健领导者的坚毅品格:一项案例研究。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2022 Jan 4;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-04-2021-0028.
7
Interprofessional team member's satisfaction: a mixed methods study of a Chilean hospital.跨专业团队成员的满意度:智利一家医院的混合方法研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0290-z.
8
The Effect of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Styles on Organizational Readiness for Change Among Health Professionals.变革型和交易型领导风格对卫生专业人员组织变革准备度的影响。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 Jul 10;9:23779608231185923. doi: 10.1177/23779608231185923. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
Nutrition Leadership Development: Capacity-Building Initiatives in Iran and the Middle-East Region Since 2009.营养领导力发展:2009 年以来伊朗和中东地区的能力建设举措。
Front Public Health. 2015 Jul 27;3:184. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00184. eCollection 2015.
10
"Perfect Leader, Perfect Leadership?" Linking Leaders' Perfectionism to Monitoring, Transformational, and Servant Leadership Behavior.“完美领导者,完美领导力?” 将领导者的完美主义与监督型、变革型和仆人型领导行为联系起来
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 16;12:657394. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657394. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
A Further Step toward Sustainable Development: The Case of the Edible Mushroom Supply Chain.迈向可持续发展的进一步举措:食用菌供应链案例
Foods. 2023 Sep 15;12(18):3433. doi: 10.3390/foods12183433.
2
The Sustainable Development Goals should be reset to prioritize poverty, health and climate.可持续发展目标应重新设定,将贫困、健康和气候列为优先事项。
Nat Med. 2023 Oct;29(10):2399-2401. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02546-7.
3
Blockchain-Based Frameworks for Food Traceability: A Systematic Review.基于区块链的食品可追溯性框架:系统综述
Foods. 2023 Aug 11;12(16):3026. doi: 10.3390/foods12163026.
4
Issue Leadership: Establishing a Domain for a Food Systems Leadership Model.问题领导力:为食品系统领导力模型确立一个领域。
Foods. 2023 Jul 4;12(13):2598. doi: 10.3390/foods12132598.
5
A Correlational Study of Two U.S. State Extension Professionals' Behavioral Intentions to Improve Sustainable Food Chains through Precision Farming Practices.一项关于两名美国州推广专业人员通过精准农业实践改善可持续食品链的行为意图的相关性研究。
Foods. 2023 May 31;12(11):2208. doi: 10.3390/foods12112208.
6
A Transition towards a Food and Agricultural System That Includes Both Food Security and Planetary Health.向一个兼顾粮食安全和地球健康的粮食与农业系统转型。
Foods. 2022 Dec 20;12(1):12. doi: 10.3390/foods12010012.
7
Construction of rice supply chain supervision model driven by blockchain smart contract.基于区块链智能合约的水稻供应链监管模型构建。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 5;12(1):20984. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25559-7.
8
Perspective article: Actions to reconfigure food systems.观点文章:重新配置粮食系统的行动
Glob Food Sec. 2020 Sep;26:100432. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100432. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
9
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.结构效度:客观测量工具的新发展。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
10
The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure.仆人式领导调查:一种多维测量方法的开发与验证
J Bus Psychol. 2011 Sep;26(3):249-267. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1. Epub 2010 Sep 3.