• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大规模伤亡事件的医院资源规划:应对多名受伤患者的局限性

Hospital Resource Planning for Mass Casualty Incidents: Limitations for Coping with Multiple Injured Patients.

作者信息

Staribacher Daniel, Rauner Marion Sabine, Niessner Helmut

机构信息

Medical University Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

Clinic for Neurosurgery, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, Buger Straße 80, D-96049 Bamberg, Germany.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 11;11(20):2713. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202713.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare11202713
PMID:37893787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10606697/
Abstract

Using a discrete-event simulation (DES) model, the current disaster plan regarding the allocation of multiple injured patients from a mass casualty incident was evaluated for an acute specialty hospital in Vienna, Austria. With the current resources available, the results showed that the number of severely injured patients currently assigned might have to wait longer than the medically justifiable limit for lifesaving surgery. Furthermore, policy scenarios of increasing staff and/or equipment did not lead to a sufficient improvement of this outcome measure. However, the mean target waiting time for critical treatment of moderately injured patients could be met under all policy scenarios. Using simulation-optimization, an optimal staff-mix could be found for an illustrative policy scenario. In addition, a multiple regression model of simulated staff-mix policy scenarios identified staff categories (number of radiologists and rotation physicians) with the highest impact on waiting time and survival. In the short term, the current hospital disaster plan should consider reducing the number of severely injured patients to be treated. In the long term, we would recommend expanding hospital capacity-in terms of both structural and human resources as well as improving regional disaster planning. Policymakers should also consider the limitations of this study when applying these insights to different areas or circumstances.

摘要

利用离散事件模拟(DES)模型,对奥地利维也纳一家急性专科医院当前针对大规模伤亡事件中多名受伤患者分配的灾难预案进行了评估。根据现有资源,结果显示,目前分配的重伤患者数量可能需要等待超过医学上合理的救命手术时限。此外,增加工作人员和/或设备的政策方案并未充分改善这一结果指标。然而,在所有政策方案下,中度受伤患者关键治疗的平均目标等待时间均能达到。通过模拟优化,可为一个说明性政策方案找到最佳人员组合。此外,模拟人员组合政策方案的多元回归模型确定了对等待时间和生存率影响最大的人员类别(放射科医生和轮转医生数量)。短期内,当前医院灾难预案应考虑减少待治疗的重伤患者数量。从长远来看,我们建议在结构和人力资源方面扩大医院容量,并改善区域灾难规划。政策制定者在将这些见解应用于不同地区或情况时,也应考虑本研究的局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef6/10606697/8835ec418ebd/healthcare-11-02713-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef6/10606697/cb91ea3b7e67/healthcare-11-02713-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef6/10606697/13474d41f7a4/healthcare-11-02713-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef6/10606697/36500ce18c5e/healthcare-11-02713-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef6/10606697/fdf9f47f3eb2/healthcare-11-02713-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef6/10606697/8835ec418ebd/healthcare-11-02713-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef6/10606697/cb91ea3b7e67/healthcare-11-02713-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef6/10606697/13474d41f7a4/healthcare-11-02713-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef6/10606697/36500ce18c5e/healthcare-11-02713-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef6/10606697/fdf9f47f3eb2/healthcare-11-02713-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef6/10606697/8835ec418ebd/healthcare-11-02713-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Hospital Resource Planning for Mass Casualty Incidents: Limitations for Coping with Multiple Injured Patients.大规模伤亡事件的医院资源规划:应对多名受伤患者的局限性
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 11;11(20):2713. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202713.
2
A Geographic Simulation Model for the Treatment of Trauma Patients in Disasters.一种用于灾害中创伤患者治疗的地理模拟模型。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Aug;31(4):413-21. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000510. Epub 2016 May 25.
3
[Primary care hospital for a mass disaster MANV IV. Experience from a mock disaster exercise].[大规模灾难的基层医疗医院MANV IV。一次模拟灾难演习的经验]
Unfallchirurg. 2009 Jun;112(6):565-74. doi: 10.1007/s00113-008-1559-9.
4
Resource planning for ambulance services in mass casualty incidents: a DES-based policy model.突发伤亡事件中救护车服务的资源规划:基于决策实验法的政策模型。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2012 Sep;15(3):254-69. doi: 10.1007/s10729-012-9198-7. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
5
Developing an efficient scheduling template of a chemotherapy treatment unit: A case study.制定化疗治疗单元的高效排班模板:一项案例研究。
Australas Med J. 2011;4(10):575-88. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2011.837. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
6
A method for detailed determination of hospital surge capacity: a prerequisite for optimal preparedness for mass-casualty incidents.一种详细确定医院应急能力的方法:为大规模伤亡事件做好最佳准备的前提条件。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Apr;49(2):619-632. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02081-z. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
7
Reconsidering the Resources Needed for Multiple Casualty Events: Lessons Learned From the Crash of Asiana Airlines Flight 214.重新考虑应对多伤员事件所需的资源:从韩亚航空公司 214 航班坠机事故中吸取的教训。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 1;151(6):512-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5107.
8
Managing multiple-casualty incidents: a rural medical preparedness training assessment.处理多伤员事件:农村医疗准备培训评估。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Aug;28(4):334-41. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13000423. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
9
Assessing Hospital Adaptive Resource Allocation Strategies in Responding to Mass Casualty Incidents.评估医院应对大规模伤亡事件的适应性资源分配策略。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jun;16(3):1105-1115. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.62. Epub 2021 May 12.
10
[Terrorist attack training exercise-What can be learned? : Baden-Württemberg counterterrorism exercise (BWTEX)].[恐怖袭击训练演习——能学到什么?:巴登-符腾堡州反恐演习(BWTEX)]
Anaesthesist. 2020 Jul;69(7):477-486. doi: 10.1007/s00101-020-00797-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of antidote quantity, timing and prehospital strategies in nerve agent mass casualty events: a simulation study.解毒剂用量、给药时机及院前策略在神经毒剂大规模伤亡事件中的影响:一项模拟研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 26;13:1640554. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1640554. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating emergency response at a hospital near the Gaza border within 24 h of increased conflict.评估加沙边境附近医院在冲突加剧后 24 小时内的应急响应情况。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Mar 21;24(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00964-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Traumatic hemorrhage and chain of survival.创伤性出血与生存链。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 May 24;31(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01088-8.
2
Why Resilience in Health Care Systems is More than Coping with Disasters: Implications for Health Care Policy.为何医疗保健系统的恢复力不止于应对灾难:对医疗保健政策的启示
Schmalenbach Z Betriebswirtsch Forsch. 2022;74(4):465-495. doi: 10.1007/s41471-022-00132-0. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
3
Central European journal of operations research (CJOR) "operations research applied to health services (ORAHS) in Europe: general trends and ORAHS 2020 conference in Vienna, Austria".
《中欧运筹学杂志》(CJOR)“欧洲卫生服务中的运筹学应用(ORAHS):总体趋势及奥地利维也纳举行的ORAHS 2020会议”
Cent Eur J Oper Res. 2022;30(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10100-021-00792-z. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
4
Review of the requirements for effective mass casualty preparedness for trauma systems. A disaster waiting to happen?创伤体系中有效大量伤亡准备的需求回顾。一场等待发生的灾难?
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Feb;128(2):e158-e167. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.038. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
5
Refining mass casualty plans with simulation-based iterative learning.基于仿真的迭代学习优化大规模伤亡事件预案。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Feb;128(2):e180-e189. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
6
Ensuring and Sustaining a Pandemic Workforce.确保并维持一支应对大流行的工作队伍。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 4;382(23):2181-2183. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2006376. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
7
The impact of mass casualty incidents on intensive care units.大批伤员事件对重症监护病房的影响。
Aust Crit Care. 2020 Sep;33(5):469-474. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
8
Triage Systems in Mass Casualty Incidents and Disasters: A Review Study with A Worldwide Approach.大规模伤亡事件和灾难中的分诊系统:一项全球视角的综述研究
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Feb 12;7(3):482-494. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.119. eCollection 2019 Feb 15.
9
[Cost estimation for hospital mass casualty exercises].[医院大规模伤亡演习的成本估算]
Unfallchirurg. 2019 May;122(5):381-386. doi: 10.1007/s00113-019-0619-7.
10
Policies for managing emergency medical services in mass casualty incidents.大规模伤亡事件中紧急医疗服务的管理政策。
Injury. 2017 Sep;48(9):1878-1883. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.034. Epub 2017 May 27.