Optimizing the Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation in the 'Oncofertility' Institutional Program at an Italian National Cancer Institute.

BACKGROUND

The majority of female cancer patients undergoing anticancer treatments are at risk of experiencing 'cancer treatment-related infertility', which can result in permanent damage to their reproductive prospects. Among the fertility preservation methods, ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) has emerged as an alternative for these patients. The Cancer Institute of Bari initiated a research program to assess the feasibility of OTC. This study compares the viability of ovarian cortical fragments cryopreserved using slow freezing (SF) and ultra-rapid freezing (URF) methods.

METHODS

Ovarian cortex biopsies were obtained from 11 fertile women enrolled in our oncofertility service between June 2022 and January 2023. After tissue collection, a histological assessment was performed before cryopreservation. OTC was carried out using both SF and URF methods. Six months later, thawed samples were evaluated for follicle counts and histological integrity.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was observed in the proportion of intact follicles (means of 31.5% and 73.0% in the SF and URF groups, respectively; = 0.064). However, there was a significant difference in the number of follicles between the SF group (n = 149) and the URF group (n = 37) ( = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

We assessed the viability of ovarian cortex after freezing and thawing, focusing on the structural integrity of follicles. Our findings suggest that there are no significant differences between the SF and URF methods.