Garcia-Mazcorro Jose F, Amieva-Balmori Mercedes, Triana-Romero Arturo, Wilson Bridgette, Smith Leanne, Reyes-Huerta Job, Rossi Megan, Whelan Kevin, Remes-Troche Jose M
Research and Development, MNA de Mexico, San Nicolas de los Garza 66477, Mexico.
Instituto de Investigaciones Médico Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz 91700, Mexico.
Microorganisms. 2023 Oct 5;11(10):2493. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11102493.
Increasing evidence suggests a microbial pathogenesis in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) but the relationship remains elusive. Fecal DNA samples from 120 patients with IBS, 82 Mexican (IBS-C: n = 33, IBS-D: n = 24, IBS-M: n = 25) and 38 British (IBS-C: n = 6, IBS-D: n = 27, IBS-M: n = 5), were available for analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Firmicutes (mean: 82.1%), Actinobacteria (10.2%), and Bacteroidetes (4.4%) were the most abundant taxa. The analysis of all samples (n = 120), and females (n = 94) only, showed no significant differences in bacterial microbiota, but the analysis of Mexican patients (n = 82) showed several differences in key taxa (e.g., ) among the different IBS subtypes. In IBS-D there were significantly higher Bacteroidetes in British patients (n = 27) than in Mexican patients (n = 24), suggesting unique fecal microbiota signatures within the same IBS subtype. These differences in IBS-D were also observed at lower phylogenetic levels (e.g., higher Enterobacteriaceae and in Mexican patients) and were accompanied by differences in several alpha diversity metrics. Beta diversity was not different among IBS subtypes when using all samples, but the analysis of IBS-D patients revealed consistent differences between Mexican and British patients. This study suggests that fecal microbiota is different between IBS subtypes and also within each subtype depending on geographical location.
越来越多的证据表明,微生物发病机制与肠易激综合征(IBS)有关,但这种关系仍不明确。从120例IBS患者的粪便DNA样本中获取了数据,其中82例为墨西哥患者(IBS-C:n = 33,IBS-D:n = 24,IBS-M:n = 25),38例为英国患者(IBS-C:n = 6,IBS-D:n = 27,IBS-M:n = 5),可用于16S rRNA基因测序分析。厚壁菌门(平均:82.1%)、放线菌门(10.2%)和拟杆菌门(4.4%)是最丰富的分类群。对所有样本(n = 120)以及仅对女性样本(n = 94)的分析显示,细菌微生物群没有显著差异,但对墨西哥患者(n = 82)的分析显示,不同IBS亚型之间在关键分类群(如 )上存在一些差异。在IBS-D中,英国患者(n = 27)的拟杆菌门显著高于墨西哥患者(n = 24),这表明同一IBS亚型内存在独特的粪便微生物群特征。在较低的系统发育水平上也观察到了IBS-D中的这些差异(例如,墨西哥患者中肠杆菌科和 的比例较高),并且伴随着几个α多样性指标的差异。使用所有样本时,IBS亚型之间的β多样性没有差异,但对IBS-D患者的分析显示,墨西哥患者和英国患者之间存在一致的差异。这项研究表明,IBS亚型之间以及每个亚型内的粪便微生物群因地理位置而异。