Monkova Katarina, Monka Peter Pavol, Hricová Romana, Hausnerova Berenika, Knapčíková Lucia
Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies, Technical University in Kosice, 080 01 Presov, Slovakia.
Faculty of Technology, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Nam. T.G. Masaryka 275, 760 01 Zlin, Czech Republic.
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Oct 15;15(20):4090. doi: 10.3390/polym15204090.
This article aims to compare the behaviour of four types of lattice structures named Cartesian, Rhomboid, Octagonal, and Starlit under tensile stress loading. The structures were made of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) material using the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) technique with three different specific volumes (24, 42, and 60%). Five samples of each type were produced, and a total of 60 samples were tested. Experimental testing was performed according to EN ISO 527-1:2012 and EN ISO 527-2:2012. The obtained data were statistically processed, while no outliers were identified. The experimental results pointed out that the specimens' topology, together with the specific volume, very significantly affected the resultant ABS properties of the tested samples made of the same material. The comparative study showed that in terms of ultimate strength, yield strength, and Young's modulus, the Cartesian structure appeared to be the most suitable for tensile stress, and the least suitable structure was the Rhomboid structure. On the other hand, the Rhomboid-type of the structure showed not only the highest amount of absorbed energy but also the highest toughness among the investigated lattice structures, so in the near future, its behaviour under an impact test should be studied.
本文旨在比较笛卡尔、菱形、八角形和星光形四种晶格结构在拉伸应力载荷下的性能。这些结构由丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯(ABS)材料制成,采用熔融长丝制造(FFF)技术,具有三种不同的比容(24%、42%和60%)。每种类型制作了五个样品,共测试了60个样品。实验测试按照EN ISO 527-1:2012和EN ISO 527-2:2012进行。对获得的数据进行了统计处理,未发现异常值。实验结果表明,试样的拓扑结构以及比容对由相同材料制成的测试样品的最终ABS性能有非常显著的影响。比较研究表明,在极限强度、屈服强度和杨氏模量方面,笛卡尔结构似乎最适合承受拉伸应力,最不适合的结构是菱形结构。另一方面,在研究的晶格结构中,菱形结构不仅吸收的能量最多,而且韧性最高,因此在不久的将来,应该研究其在冲击试验下的性能。