Strategic Analysis, Research & Training (START) Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Viruses. 2023 Oct 14;15(10):2092. doi: 10.3390/v15102092.
Zero-dose children, or children who have not received any routine vaccination, are a priority population for global health policy makers as these children are at high risk of mortality from vaccine-preventable illnesses. We conducted a narrative review to identify potential interventions, both within and outside of the health sector, to reach zero-dose children. We reviewed the peer-reviewed and grey literature and identified 27 relevant resources. Additionally, we interviewed six key informants to enhance the synthesis of our findings. Data were organized into three priority settings: (1) urban slums, (2) remote or rural communities, and (3) conflict settings. We found that zero-dose children in the three priority settings face differing barriers to vaccination and, therefore, require context-specific interventions, such as leveraging slum health committees for urban slums or integrating with existing humanitarian response services for conflict settings. Three predominant themes emerged for grouping the various interventions: (1) community engagement, (2) health systems' strengthening and integration, and (3) technological innovations. The barriers to reaching zero-dose children are multifaceted and nuanced to each setting, therefore, no one intervention is enough. Technological interventions especially must be coupled with community engagement and health systems' strengthening efforts. Evaluations of the suggested interventions are needed to guide scale-up, as the evidence base around these interventions is relatively small.
零剂量儿童,即未接受任何常规疫苗接种的儿童,是全球卫生政策制定者的重点关注人群,因为这些儿童因可通过疫苗预防的疾病而面临高死亡率的风险。我们进行了叙述性综述,以确定在卫生部门内外可以采取哪些潜在干预措施来接触零剂量儿童。我们查阅了同行评议和灰色文献,确定了 27 份相关资源。此外,我们还采访了六位主要知情人,以加强对我们研究结果的综合分析。数据分为三个重点设置进行组织:(1)城市贫民窟,(2)偏远或农村社区,以及(3)冲突地区。我们发现,在这三个重点设置中的零剂量儿童面临不同的疫苗接种障碍,因此需要有针对性的干预措施,例如在城市贫民窟利用贫民窟健康委员会,或在冲突地区与现有的人道主义应对服务相结合。有三个主要主题出现,用于对各种干预措施进行分组:(1)社区参与,(2)加强和整合卫生系统,以及(3)技术创新。接触零剂量儿童的障碍是多方面的,且每个设置都有细微差别,因此,单一干预措施是不够的。技术干预措施尤其必须与社区参与和加强卫生系统的努力相结合。需要对建议的干预措施进行评估,以指导其扩大规模,因为这些干预措施的证据基础相对较小。