Suppr超能文献

采用矩形隧道技术进行一期翻修前交叉韧带重建后的满意结果。

Satisfactory outcomes after one-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using rectangular tunnel technique.

作者信息

Okimura Shinichiro, Suzuki Tomoyuki, Ikeda Yasutoshi, Shiwaku Kousuke, Teramoto Atsushi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South-1, West-16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8543, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Maruyama Orthopaedic Hospital, North-7, West-27-1-3, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0007, Japan.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5690-5697. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07627-1. Epub 2023 Oct 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

One-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with the anatomic rectangular tunnel (RT) technique using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts results in anatomically precise tunnel placement and secure graft fixation. This study evaluated knee joint laxity and clinical outcomes in terms of femoral tunnel overlap. It was hypothesised that there would be no significant differences in knee joint laxity or clinical outcomes regardless of femoral tunnel overlap.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2021, a single surgeon conducted 196 one-stage revision ACLRs with the RT technique using BTB grafts. Patients were divided based on the presence of femoral tunnel overlap. Knee joint laxity was evaluated using the Lachman test, pivot shift test, and side-to-side difference measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Knee Examination Form 2000. Knee joint laxity and clinical outcomes were compared between groups after a median follow-up of 2.5 years (range 2.0-8.0).

RESULTS

The study included 30 and 73 patients in the overlap and non-overlap groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the results of the Lachman test, pivot shift test, or KT-1000 arthrometer as well as in the Lysholm, KOOS, or IKDC scores between the two groups. Based on the IKDC scores, all patients were graded as normal or nearly normal.

CONCLUSION

One-stage revision ACLR with the RT technique using BTB grafts improved knee joint laxity and had favourable clinical outcomes regardless of femoral tunnel overlap. To achieve optimal results in one-stage revision ACLR, it is crucial to create a tunnel within the anatomical attachment area and ensure proper graft fixation and tensioning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

采用骨-髌腱-骨(BTB)移植物,通过解剖矩形隧道(RT)技术进行一期翻修前交叉韧带重建(ACLR),可实现隧道位置的解剖学精确性和移植物的牢固固定。本研究根据股骨隧道重叠情况评估膝关节松弛度和临床结果。研究假设是,无论股骨隧道是否重叠,膝关节松弛度或临床结果均无显著差异。

方法

2012年至2021年期间,一名外科医生采用RT技术使用BTB移植物进行了196例一期翻修ACLR手术。根据股骨隧道重叠情况对患者进行分组。使用Lachman试验、轴移试验以及用KT-1000关节测量仪测量的两侧差异来评估膝关节松弛度。使用Lysholm评分、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)以及国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)2000版膝关节检查表评估临床结果。在中位随访2.5年(范围2.0 - 8.0年)后,比较两组之间的膝关节松弛度和临床结果。

结果

重叠组和非重叠组分别纳入30例和73例患者。两组之间在Lachman试验、轴移试验或KT-1000关节测量仪的结果以及Lysholm、KOOS或IKDC评分方面均未观察到显著差异。根据IKDC评分,所有患者均被评为正常或接近正常。

结论

采用RT技术使用BTB移植物进行一期翻修ACLR,无论股骨隧道是否重叠,均可改善膝关节松弛度并获得良好的临床结果。为在一期翻修ACLR中取得最佳效果,在解剖附着区域内创建隧道并确保移植物正确固定和张紧至关重要。证据等级:III级

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验