Sanghavi Sonali, Ghoshal Ujjala, Poddar Sumon, Satpute Meenakshi, Sahu Chinmoy, Pawar Dattatray, Sharma Akhilesh, Vaidya Pooja H
Microbiology, KEM Hospital, Pune, IND.
Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Sep 26;15(9):e46014. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46014. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Background This study was designed to evaluate the current in vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates to broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics. Methodology Bacterial isolates, cultured from 180 non-repetitive clinical samples between April and November 2022 at three hospitals in India, were used to evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics using the Epsilometer test (E-test) method. Test antibiotics were ceftriaxone and ceftriaxone in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) sulbactam and tazobactam. Comparator antibiotics included amoxicillin + BLI clavulanic acid, piperacillin + tazobactam, cefotaxime, and cefepime. The MIC values obtained were used to assess the susceptibility of the isolates and to compute the efficacy ratios (ERs) of the antibiotics. Results Among the 180 clinical isolates, ~89% were gram-negative bacteria, the most prevalent ones being and . Of the gram-negative isolates, ~37% were susceptible/intermediately susceptible to ceftriaxone, and ~29% were susceptible to ceftriaxone + BLIs. The test antibiotics had ER >10 against 85%-95% isolates, whereas comparator antibiotics had ER >10 against 31%-68% isolates. The differences between the test antibiotics and piperacillin + tazobactam or cefotaxime were statistically significant. Ceftriaxone, ceftriaxone + sulbactam, and ceftriaxone + tazobactam had ER >10 against 78%, 100%, and 90% of isolates, while the corresponding percentages for cefotaxime, piperacillin + tazobactam, and cefepime were 100%, 64%, and 80%, respectively. The difference between ceftriaxone + BLIs and piperacillin + tazobactam was statistically significant. Ceftriaxone + BLIs had ER >10 against all isolates producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs); the percentage of isolates was significantly higher than that for piperacillin + tazobactam. Ceftriaxone + tazobactam had ER >10 against all ESBL-producing isolates; ceftriaxone and ceftriaxone + sulbactam had ER ranging 6-10. Conclusions Ceftriaxone and ceftriaxone in combination with sulbactam and tazobactam are promising antibiotics to explore against prevalent infectious microorganisms such as and . Ceftriaxone + tazobactam also holds promise against ESBL-producing variants.
背景 本研究旨在评估临床分离株对广谱β-内酰胺类抗生素的当前体外敏感性。方法 从2022年4月至11月印度三家医院的180份非重复临床样本中培养的细菌分离株,采用Epsilometer试验(E试验)方法评估广谱β-内酰胺类抗生素的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。受试抗生素为头孢曲松以及头孢曲松与β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(BLIs)舒巴坦和他唑巴坦的组合。对照抗生素包括阿莫西林+BLIs克拉维酸、哌拉西林+他唑巴坦、头孢噻肟和头孢吡肟。获得的MIC值用于评估分离株的敏感性并计算抗生素的疗效比(ERs)。结果 在180株临床分离株中,约89%为革兰氏阴性菌,最常见的是[此处原文缺失两种细菌名称]。在革兰氏阴性分离株中,约37%对头孢曲松敏感/中度敏感,约29%对头孢曲松+BLIs敏感。受试抗生素对85%-95%的分离株的ER>10,而对照抗生素对31%-68%的分离株的ER>10。受试抗生素与哌拉西林+他唑巴坦或头孢噻肟之间的差异具有统计学意义。头孢曲松、头孢曲松+舒巴坦和头孢曲松+他唑巴坦对78%、100%和90%的[此处原文缺失细菌名称]分离株的ER>10,而头孢噻肟、哌拉西林+他唑巴坦和头孢吡肟的相应百分比分别为100%、64%和80%。头孢曲松+BLIs与哌拉西林+他唑巴坦之间的差异具有统计学意义。头孢曲松+BLIs对所有产生超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)的[此处原文缺失细菌名称]分离株的ER>10;分离株的百分比显著高于哌拉西林+他唑巴坦。头孢曲松+他唑巴坦对所有产ESBLs的[此处原文缺失细菌名称]分离株的ER>10;头孢曲松和头孢曲松+舒巴坦的ER范围为6-10。结论 头孢曲松以及头孢曲松与舒巴坦和他唑巴坦的组合是有前景的抗生素,可用于对抗如[此处原文缺失两种细菌名称]等常见感染性微生物。头孢曲松+他唑巴坦对产ESBLs的变体也有前景。