Suppr超能文献

有机种植与传统种植:栽培处理对葡萄园土壤微生物群的影响。

Organic vs. conventional: impact of cultivation treatments on the soil microbiota in the vineyard.

作者信息

Colautti Andrea, Civilini Marcello, Contin Marco, Celotti Emilio, Iacumin Lucilla

机构信息

Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2023 Oct 12;14:1242267. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1242267. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two vineyard management practices on the soil and its associated microbiota. The experiments were conducted in two adjacent plots, one completely organically managed and the other conventionally managed in terms of phytosanitary treatments but fertilized with organic amendments. The chemical soil analyses were correlated to the prokaryotic and fungal communities, which were studied using the metabarcoding technique. The main difference between the two treatments was a significantly higher amount of Cu in the organic managed vineyard soil, while conventional managed soil presented higher concentration of Na and Mg and was also associated with higher pH values. Despite these differences, no significant diversities were observed on soil biodiversity and microbial composition considering alpha and beta diversity metrics. However, the percentages of some phyla analyzed individually differed significantly between the two managements. Analyzing the metabolisms of these phyla, it was discovered an increment of species correlated to soils with higher organic matter content or land not used for agricultural purposes in the organic treated soil. The findings indicate that, despite the use of copper-based phytosanitary products, there was no degradation and loss of biodiversity in the organic soil microbial population compared to conventional management with the same type of fertilization, and the observed microbial population was more similar to that of natural soils.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种葡萄园管理方式对土壤及其相关微生物群的影响。实验在两块相邻的地块上进行,一块完全采用有机管理,另一块在植物检疫处理方面采用传统管理,但使用有机改良剂施肥。土壤化学分析与原核生物和真菌群落相关,这些群落采用元条形码技术进行研究。两种处理方式的主要差异在于,有机管理的葡萄园土壤中铜含量显著更高,而传统管理的土壤中钠和镁浓度更高,且pH值也更高。尽管存在这些差异,但考虑到α和β多样性指标,在土壤生物多样性和微生物组成方面未观察到显著差异。然而,单独分析的一些门的百分比在两种管理方式之间存在显著差异。分析这些门的代谢情况发现,在经过有机处理的土壤中,与有机质含量较高的土壤或未用于农业目的的土地相关的物种有所增加。研究结果表明,尽管使用了铜基植物检疫产品,但与相同施肥类型的传统管理相比,有机土壤微生物群落的生物多样性没有退化和丧失,且观察到的微生物群落与天然土壤的微生物群落更为相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dea3/10602642/49a3b2dd533f/fmicb-14-1242267-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验