Suppr超能文献

补充干预措施重新设计医疗患者住院期间的护理对团队合作和质量的影响:一项实用对照试验。

Effect of Complementary Interventions to Redesign Care on Teamwork and Quality for Hospitalized Medical Patients : A Pragmatic Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Division of Hospital Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (K.J.O., G.R.S., J.S.K.).

Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (J.K.J.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2023 Nov;176(11):1456-1464. doi: 10.7326/M23-0953. Epub 2023 Oct 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple challenges impede interprofessional teamwork and the provision of high-quality care to hospitalized patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of interventions to redesign hospital care delivery on teamwork and patient outcomes.

DESIGN

Pragmatic controlled trial. Hospitals selected 1 unit for implementation of interventions and a second to serve as a control. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03745677).

SETTING

Medical units at 4 U.S. hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Health care professionals and hospitalized medical patients.

INTERVENTION

Mentored implementation of unit-based physician teams, unit nurse-physician coleadership, enhanced interprofessional rounds, unit-level performance reports, and patient engagement activities.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcomes were teamwork climate among health care professionals and adverse events experienced by patients. Secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmissions, and patient experience. Difference-in-differences (DID) analyses of patient outcomes compared intervention versus control units before and after implementation of interventions.

RESULTS

Among 155 professionals who completed pre- and postintervention surveys, the median teamwork climate score was higher after than before the intervention only for nurses ( = 77) (median score, 88.0 [IQR, 77.0 to 91.0] vs. 80.0 [IQR, 70.0 to 89.0];  = 0.022). Among 3773 patients, a greater percentage had at least 1 adverse event after compared with before the intervention on control units (change, 1.61 percentage points [95% CI, 0.01 to 3.22 percentage points]). A similar percentage of patients had at least 1 adverse event after compared with before the intervention on intervention units (change, 0.43 percentage point [CI, -1.25 to 2.12 percentage points]). A DID analysis of adverse events did not show a significant difference in change (adjusted DID, -0.92 percentage point [CI, -2.49 to 0.64 percentage point];  = 0.25). Similarly, there were no differences in LOS, readmissions, or patient experience.

LIMITATION

Adverse events occurred less frequently than anticipated, limiting statistical power.

CONCLUSION

Despite improved teamwork climate among nurses, interventions to redesign care for hospitalized patients were not associated with improved patient outcomes.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

摘要

背景

多种挑战阻碍了跨专业团队合作和为住院患者提供高质量的护理。

目的

评估重新设计医院护理服务交付的干预措施对团队合作和患者结局的影响。

设计

实用对照试验。医院选择一个病房实施干预措施,另一个病房作为对照。(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03745677)。

地点

美国 4 家医院的医疗病房。

参与者

医护人员和住院患者。

干预措施

在基于病房的医生团队、病房护士和医生共同领导、强化跨专业查房、病房层面的绩效报告和患者参与活动方面,提供导师指导下的实施。

测量

主要结局是医护人员之间的团队合作氛围和患者经历的不良事件。次要结局是住院时间(LOS)、30 天再入院率和患者体验。实施干预前后,对干预组与对照组的患者结局进行差异分析(DID)。

结果

在 155 名完成干预前后调查的专业人员中,护士的团队合作氛围评分仅在干预后高于干预前(=77)(中位数评分,88.0 [IQR,77.0 至 91.0] 与 80.0 [IQR,70.0 至 89.0];=0.022)。在 3773 名患者中,与干预前相比,对照组中有更多的患者在干预后至少发生了 1 次不良事件(变化,1.61 个百分点 [95%CI,0.01 至 3.22 个百分点])。干预组患者在干预后至少发生了 1 次不良事件的比例与干预前相似(变化,0.43 个百分点 [CI,-1.25 至 2.12 个百分点])。不良事件的 DID 分析显示,变化无显著差异(调整后的 DID,-0.92 个百分点 [CI,-2.49 至 0.64 个百分点];=0.25)。同样,LOS、再入院率或患者体验也没有差异。

局限性

不良事件的发生频率低于预期,限制了统计效力。

结论

尽管护士的团队合作氛围有所改善,但重新设计住院患者护理服务的干预措施并未改善患者结局。

主要资金来源

美国医疗保健研究与质量局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验