Protzko John, Schooler Jonathan W
Department of Psychological Science, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT, United States.
Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 12;14:1017313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1017313. eCollection 2023.
Throughout history, technological and societal changes consistently receive suspicion. Their influences appear damaging, corrupting, and potential precursors to societal downfall, with today's youth often portrayed as the primary victims. This study aims to explore an underlying reason for these perceptions and to investigate why society frequently perceives technological and societal transitions as detrimental to the younger generation.
We conduct two studies across a total of 1,702 participants. In a pilot study, American adults generate a list of technological/societal innovations they believe to be especially problematic for youth in various ways. The second study maps beliefs that specific technological/societal shifts are corruptive, correlating with whether American adults experience them during their upbringing.
People view recent technologies as particularly corrupting of today's youth. A notable within-person correlation exists between an individual's exposure to specific technologies during their youth and their belief that these technologies corrupt today's youth. Specifically, people are more inclined to view technological/societal shifts as corruptive if they don't experience them during their formative years ( = -0.09, < 0.001, 95%CI = [-0.11, -0.09]). When reminded of their own exposure to a particular innovation during their upbringing, however, this relationship reduces.
These findings suggest unfamiliarity currently stands as a pivotal factor in societal apprehensions regarding new technological and societal evolutions. As society welcomes new innovations, an enduring cycle emerges where those unacquainted changes seem corruptive to the newer generations. Recognizing this bias, primarily driven by mere unfamiliarity, may be crucial for more balanced evaluations of the inevitable technological and societal progress.
纵观历史,技术和社会变革一直备受质疑。它们的影响似乎具有破坏性、腐蚀性,是社会衰落的潜在先兆,而如今的年轻人常被描绘成主要受害者。本研究旨在探究这些认知背后的根本原因,并调查为何社会常常认为技术和社会转型对年轻一代有害。
我们对总共1702名参与者进行了两项研究。在一项试点研究中,美国成年人列出了他们认为在各方面对年轻人特别有问题的技术/社会创新清单。第二项研究梳理了关于特定技术/社会变革具有腐蚀性的信念,并将其与美国成年人在成长过程中是否经历过这些变革相关联。
人们认为近期的技术对当今的年轻人尤其具有腐蚀性。一个人在年轻时接触特定技术与他们认为这些技术腐蚀当今年轻人的信念之间存在显著的个体内部相关性。具体而言,如果人们在成长阶段没有经历过某些技术/社会变革,他们就更倾向于认为这些变革具有腐蚀性(β = -0.09,p < 0.001,95%CI = [-0.11, -0.09])。然而,当他们回忆起自己在成长过程中接触过某项特定创新时,这种关系就会减弱。
这些发现表明,目前不熟悉是社会对新技术和社会演变感到担忧的一个关键因素。随着社会接纳新的创新,一个持久的循环出现了:那些不熟悉的变革对新一代来说似乎具有腐蚀性。认识到这种主要由单纯不熟悉驱动的偏见,对于更平衡地评估不可避免的技术和社会进步可能至关重要。