Suppr超能文献

广泛性焦虑症、惊恐障碍及伴有惊恐发作的场所恐惧症中血小板[3H]丙咪嗪结合情况

Platelet [3H]imipramine binding in generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and agoraphobia with panic attacks.

作者信息

Schneider L S, Munjack D, Severson J A, Palmer R

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 1987 Jan;22(1):59-66. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(87)90130-2.

Abstract

The density of platelet [3H]imipramine binding sites is reported to be decreased in unipolar depression and, hence, is a putative biological marker. There is considerable evidence for a phenomenological and biological relationship of panic disorder with affective disorder. We studied platelet [3H]imipramine binding site density in unmedicated subjects with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; n = 55), panic disorder (PD) with and without agoraphobia (n = 52), and normal controls (n = 26) in order to determine whether or not patients with panic disorder differed from controls in this biological assay. We found no differences in binding site density (Bmax) or affinity (Kd) among the PD, PD with agoraphobia, GAD, and control groups. Nor did we find a relationship between Bmax or Kd and the severity of depressive symptoms or the presence of a family history of affective disorder. In view of two conflicting prior studies, the use of [3H]imipramine binding in panic disorder remains problematic.

摘要

据报道,单相抑郁症患者血小板[3H]丙咪嗪结合位点的密度降低,因此它是一种假定的生物学标志物。有大量证据表明惊恐障碍与情感障碍在现象学和生物学上存在关联。我们研究了未接受药物治疗的广泛性焦虑症(GAD;n = 55)、伴有和不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍(PD;n = 52)患者以及正常对照者(n = 26)的血小板[3H]丙咪嗪结合位点密度,以确定惊恐障碍患者在这项生物学检测中是否与对照组存在差异。我们发现惊恐障碍组、伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍组、广泛性焦虑症组和对照组之间在结合位点密度(Bmax)或亲和力(Kd)方面没有差异。我们也未发现Bmax或Kd与抑郁症状的严重程度或情感障碍家族史的存在之间存在关联。鉴于之前两项相互矛盾的研究,在惊恐障碍中使用[3H]丙咪嗪结合法仍存在问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验