• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经桡动脉远心端入路进行心血管介入治疗后桡动脉远心端闭塞的发生率及其影响因素

Incidence of Distal Radial Artery Occlusion and its Influencing Factors After Cardiovascular Intervention Via the Distal Transradial Access.

作者信息

Chen Tao, Li Lamei, Yang Anni, Huang Hui, Shi Ganwei, Li Feng, Li Wenhua, Lu Wei, Xu Lingxia, Li Li, Cai Gaojun

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, the Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou City, China.

Department of Cardiology, Jiangyin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangyin City, China.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Oct 31:15266028231208638. doi: 10.1177/15266028231208638.

DOI:10.1177/15266028231208638
PMID:37906607
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

One of the important advantages of the distal transradial access (dTRA) is the significant reduction in the incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO). There are few reports on the influencing factors for distal radial artery occlusion (dRAO) after cardiovascular interventions via the dTRA.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included the clinical data of patients who underwent a cardiovascular intervention via the dTRA. The dRAO was evaluated by ultrasound within 24 hours after the procedure. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to explore the influencing factors for dRAO.

RESULTS

The incidence of dRAO was 3.5% (28/805) at 24 hours follow-up after the procedure. In the comparison between the 2 groups, the preoperative distal radial artery (DRA) internal diameter in the dRAO group was significantly smaller than that in the non-dRAO group (p=0.001). The prevalence of DRA inner diameter/sheath outer diameter <1 was significantly higher in the dRAO group than in the non-dRAO group (p=0.013). The number of puncture attempts was significantly greater in the dRAO group than in the non-dRAO group (p=0.007). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that DRA inner diameter/sheath outer diameter <1 was an independent risk factor for dRAO (OR=4.827, 95% CI=1.087-21.441, p=0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of dRAO 24 hours after cardiovascular intervention via the dTRA was 3.5%, and a DRA inner diameter/sheath outer diameter <1 was an independent risk factor for dRAO. Preoperative ultrasound assessment of vessel inner diameter and selection of a sheath with a smaller outer diameter may reduce the risk of dRAO.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The incidence of distal radial artery occlusion after cardiovascular intervention was 3.5%. The distal radial artery inner diameter/sheath outer diameter <1 was an independent risk factor for distal radial artery occlusion. Preoperative ultrasound assessment of vessel inner diameter and selection of a sheath with a smaller outer diameter may reduce the risk of distal radial artery occlusion. The number of puncture attempts and compression time were not related to distal radial artery occlusion.

摘要

引言

桡动脉远端入路(dTRA)的重要优势之一是桡动脉闭塞(RAO)发生率显著降低。关于经dTRA进行心血管介入治疗后桡动脉远端闭塞(dRAO)的影响因素报道较少。

方法

本回顾性分析纳入了经dTRA进行心血管介入治疗的患者的临床资料。术后24小时内通过超声评估dRAO情况。采用多因素逻辑回归分析探讨dRAO的影响因素。

结果

术后24小时随访时,dRAO发生率为3.5%(28/805)。两组比较,dRAO组术前桡动脉远端(DRA)内径显著小于非dRAO组(p=0.001)。dRAO组DRA内径/鞘管外径<1的比例显著高于非dRAO组(p=0.013)。dRAO组穿刺尝试次数显著多于非dRAO组(p=0.007)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,DRA内径/鞘管外径<1是dRAO的独立危险因素(OR=4.827,95%CI=1.087-21.441,p=0.039)。

结论

经dTRA进行心血管介入治疗后24小时dRAO发生率为3.5%,DRA内径/鞘管外径<1是dRAO的独立危险因素。术前超声评估血管内径并选择外径较小的鞘管可能降低dRAO风险。

临床意义

心血管介入治疗后桡动脉远端闭塞发生率为3.5%。桡动脉远端内径/鞘管外径<1是桡动脉远端闭塞的独立危险因素。术前超声评估血管内径并选择外径较小的鞘管可能降低桡动脉远端闭塞风险。穿刺尝试次数和压迫时间与桡动脉远端闭塞无关。

相似文献

1
Incidence of Distal Radial Artery Occlusion and its Influencing Factors After Cardiovascular Intervention Via the Distal Transradial Access.经桡动脉远心端入路进行心血管介入治疗后桡动脉远心端闭塞的发生率及其影响因素
J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Oct 31:15266028231208638. doi: 10.1177/15266028231208638.
2
Comparison of the Effect of a 6-French Glidesheath Slender and a Conventional Sheath on Distal Radial Artery Occlusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.6F 泥鳅导丝超滑鞘与传统鞘对桡动脉远端闭塞影响的对比:一项随机对照试验。
Can J Cardiol. 2024 Nov;40(11):2292-2300. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.07.011. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
3
Factors Affecting Radial Artery Occlusion After Right Transradial Artery Catheterization for Coronary Intervention and Procedures.冠状动脉介入治疗及相关操作经右侧桡动脉导管插入术后影响桡动脉闭塞的因素。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Jun 24;19:525-533. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S403410. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison of long-term radial artery occlusion via distal vs. conventional transradial access (CONDITION): a randomized controlled trial.经远端桡动脉与传统桡动脉入路比较桡动脉长期闭塞的情况(CONDITION):一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2024 Feb 8;22(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03281-7.
5
Safety and feasibility of a 7F thin-walled sheath distal transradial artery access for complex coronary intervention.用于复杂冠状动脉介入治疗的7F薄壁鞘经桡动脉远端入路的安全性和可行性。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 12;9:959197. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.959197. eCollection 2022.
6
Radial artery occlusion after conventional and distal radial access: Impact of preserved flow and time-to-hemostasis in a propensity-score matching analysis of 1163 patients.传统桡动脉径路和远端桡动脉径路后桡动脉闭塞:1163 例患者倾向性评分匹配分析中保留血流和止血时间的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):827-835. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30005. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
7
Distal radial access and postprocedural ultrasound evaluation of proximal and distal radial artery.经桡动脉远段入路及桡动脉近段和远段的超声术后评估。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Oct;37(4):710-716. doi: 10.1007/s12928-022-00857-z. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
8
Feasibility of Distal Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Single Center Experience.桡动脉远端入路用于冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性:单中心经验
Cardiology. 2021;146(5):531-537. doi: 10.1159/000517076. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
9
Distal transradial access decreases radial artery occlusion rate in percutaneous coronary interventions.在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中,桡动脉远端入路可降低桡动脉闭塞率。
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Apr 15;15(4):2802-2810. eCollection 2023.
10
Feasibility and radial artery occlusion rate of sheathless distal transradial access using balloon guide catheters.使用球囊导引导管行无鞘经远端桡动脉入路的可行性和桡动脉闭塞率。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Oct 14;47(1):795. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02994-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and safety of the distal radial access for vascular access interventional therapy.桡动脉远端通路用于血管介入治疗的可行性与安全性。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 May 4. doi: 10.1007/s12928-025-01127-4.
2
Efficacy of uterine artery embolization through a distal radial artery approach for treatment of uterine fibroids.经桡动脉远心端入路子宫动脉栓塞术治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Feb 15;17(2):1277-1289. doi: 10.62347/XDKF7084. eCollection 2025.
3
Risk factors for puncture-related complications after cerebrovascular angiography and neuroendovascular intervention with distal transradial approach.
经桡动脉远端入路脑血管造影和神经介入治疗后穿刺相关并发症的危险因素。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03940-5.
4
The occlusion rates after distal radial access: how to multiply your bullets.桡动脉远端入路后的闭塞率:如何增加你的“子弹”(资源)。
BMC Med. 2024 Jun 13;22(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03470-4.