Unità Operativa di Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Cristina Belgioioso 173, 20157, Milan, Italy.
Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Radiol Med. 2024 Jan;129(1):107-117. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01732-4. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
To compare pathologic and healthy tendons using shear-wave elastography (SWE).
A systematic review with meta-analysis was done searching Pubmed and EMBASE up to September 2022. Prospective, retrospective and cross-sectional studies that used SWE in the assessment of pathologic tendons versus control were included. Our primary outcome were SWE velocity (m/s) and stiffness (kPa). Methodological quality was assessed by the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). We used the mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify effects between groups. We performed sensitivity analysis in case of high heterogeneity, after excluding poor quality studies according to MINORS assessment. We used Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation to evaluate the certainty of evidence (CoE).
Overall, 16 studies with 676 pathologic tendons (188 Achilles, 142 patellar, 96 supraspinatus, 250 mixed) and 723 control tendons (484 healthy; 239 contralateral tendon) were included. Five studies (31.3%) were judged as poor methodological quality. Shear-wave velocity and stiffness meta-analyses showed high heterogeneity. According to a sensitivity analysis, pathologic tendons had a lower shear wave velocity (MD of - 1.69 m/s; 95% CI 1.85; - 1.52; n = 274; I 50%) compared to healthy tendons with very low CoE. Sensitivity analysis on stiffness still showed high heterogeneity.
Pathological tendons may have reduced SWE velocity compared to controls, but the evidence is very uncertain. Future robust high-quality longitudinal studies and clear technical indications on the use of this tool are needed.
PROSPERO identifier: CRD42023405410 CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: SWE is a relatively recent modality that may increase sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of conventional ultrasound imaging promoting early detection of tendinopathy. Non-negligible heterogeneity has been observed in included studies, so our findings may encourage the conduct of future high-quality longitudinal studies which can provide clear technical indications on the use of this promising tool in tendon imaging.
使用剪切波弹性成像(SWE)比较病理和正常肌腱。
系统检索 Pubmed 和 EMBASE 数据库,检索截至 2022 年 9 月的相关文献,纳入使用 SWE 评估病理肌腱与对照肌腱的前瞻性、回顾性和横断面研究。主要结局指标为 SWE 速度(m/s)和硬度(kPa)。采用非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)评估方法学质量。采用均数差(MD)及其相应的 95%置信区间(CI)来量化组间效应。如果存在高度异质性,我们将根据 MINORS 评估排除低质量研究后进行敏感性分析。我们使用推荐、评估、制定和评估分级(Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation,GRADE)来评估证据的确定性(CoE)。
共有 16 项研究纳入 676 条病理肌腱(188 条跟腱、142 条髌腱、96 条冈上肌腱、250 条混合肌腱)和 723 条对照肌腱(484 条健康肌腱、239 条对侧肌腱)。其中 5 项研究(31.3%)被判定为低质量研究。剪切波速度和硬度的 meta 分析显示存在高度异质性。敏感性分析显示,与健康肌腱相比,病理肌腱的剪切波速度较低(MD:-1.69 m/s;95%CI:1.85;-1.52;n=274;I 50%=75%),证据的 CoE 非常低。对硬度的敏感性分析仍显示存在高度异质性。
与对照肌腱相比,病理肌腱的 SWE 速度可能较低,但证据非常不确定。未来需要进行更多的高质量前瞻性研究,并明确该工具的使用技术指标。
PROSPERO 标识符:CRD42023405410。临床相关性声明:SWE 是一种相对较新的方法,可能会提高常规超声成像的敏感性和诊断准确性,从而促进对肌腱病的早期发现。纳入的研究存在不可忽视的异质性,因此我们的研究结果可能会鼓励开展更多的高质量前瞻性研究,为该有前途的工具在肌腱成像中的应用提供明确的技术指标。