Suppr超能文献

肌肉骨骼软组织和神经剪切波弹性成像研究中使用方法的范围综述。

A scoping review of methods used in musculoskeletal soft tissue and nerve shear wave elastography studies.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Georgetown University Hospital-MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Aug;140:181-195. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.04.013. Epub 2022 Apr 30.

Abstract

This scoping review of shear wave elastography (SWE) articles in musculoskeletal soft tissue and nerve research demonstrates methodological heterogeneity resulting from a lack of standardized data collection and reporting requirements. Seven literature databases were searched for original articles published in English from 2004-2020 that examine human skeletal muscles, tendons, and nerves in vivo. Although 5,868 records were initially identified, only 375 reports met inclusion criteria. Of the 375 articles, 260 examined 89 unique muscles, 94 examined 14 unique tendons, and 43 examined 8 unique nerves. Cohorts were often small (n = 11-20) and young (mean = 20-29 years), and participants were typically tested in the prone position. Regarding equipment, a variety of ultrasound systems (n = 11), ultrasound models (n = 18), and transducers (n = 19) were identified. Only 11% of articles contained information on the use of electromyography to confirm absence of muscle activity, and only 8% reported measurement depth. Since musculoskeletal soft tissue and nerve stiffness can vary significantly based on data collection methods, it is essential to standardize SWE collection and reporting procedures. This will allow SWE to serve as a valid and reproducible tool for assessing tissue pathology, disease progression, and response to intervention within a variety of musculoskeletal and nerve-related disorders.

摘要

本研究对肌骨软组织和神经领域中剪切波弹性成像(SWE)的文献进行了范围综述,结果表明,由于缺乏标准化的数据采集和报告要求,研究方法存在很大差异。本研究检索了 2004 年至 2020 年间以英文发表的、评估人体骨骼肌、肌腱和神经的原始研究,共纳入了 7 个文献数据库。尽管最初确定了 5868 条记录,但只有 375 份报告符合纳入标准。在这 375 篇文章中,有 260 篇文章研究了 89 块不同的肌肉,94 篇文章研究了 14 块不同的肌腱,43 篇文章研究了 8 条不同的神经。队列通常规模较小(n=11-20)且年龄较小(平均 20-29 岁),参与者通常在俯卧位进行测试。在设备方面,共涉及 11 种超声系统(n=11)、18 种超声型号(n=18)和 19 种换能器。仅有 11%的文章包含关于肌电图的使用信息,以确认肌肉活动的缺失,仅有 8%的文章报告了测量深度。由于肌骨软组织和神经的弹性会因数据采集方法的不同而有很大差异,因此标准化 SWE 的采集和报告程序至关重要。这将使 SWE 能够成为评估各种肌肉骨骼和神经相关疾病中的组织病理学、疾病进展和干预反应的有效且可重复的工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验