• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健中的会话代理:专家访谈以提供定义、分类和概念框架。

Conversational Agents in Health Care: Expert Interviews to Inform the Definition, Classification, and Conceptual Framework.

机构信息

Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Future Health Technologies Programme, Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise, Singapore-ETH Centre, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 1;25:e50767. doi: 10.2196/50767.

DOI:10.2196/50767
PMID:37910153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10652195/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conversational agents (CAs), or chatbots, are computer programs that simulate conversations with humans. The use of CAs in health care settings is recent and rapidly increasing, which often translates to poor reporting of the CA development and evaluation processes and unreliable research findings. We developed and published a conceptual framework, designing, developing, evaluating, and implementing a smartphone-delivered, rule-based conversational agent (DISCOVER), consisting of 3 iterative stages of CA design, development, and evaluation and implementation, complemented by 2 cross-cutting themes (user-centered design and data privacy and security).

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to perform in-depth, semistructured interviews with multidisciplinary experts in health care CAs to share their views on the definition and classification of health care CAs and evaluate and validate the DISCOVER conceptual framework.

METHODS

We conducted one-on-one semistructured interviews via Zoom (Zoom Video Communications) with 12 multidisciplinary CA experts using an interview guide based on our framework. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed by the research team, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Following participants' input, we defined CAs as digital interfaces that use natural language to engage in a synchronous dialogue using ≥1 communication modality, such as text, voice, images, or video. CAs were classified by 13 categories: response generation method, input and output modalities, CA purpose, deployment platform, CA development modality, appearance, length of interaction, type of CA-user interaction, dialogue initiation, communication style, CA personality, human support, and type of health care intervention. Experts considered that the conceptual framework could be adapted for artificial intelligence-based CAs. However, despite recent advances in artificial intelligence, including large language models, the technology is not able to ensure safety and reliability in health care settings. Finally, aligned with participants' feedback, we present an updated iteration of the conceptual framework for health care conversational agents (CHAT) with key considerations for CA design, development, and evaluation and implementation, complemented by 3 cross-cutting themes: ethics, user involvement, and data privacy and security.

CONCLUSIONS

We present an expanded, validated CHAT and aim at guiding researchers from a variety of backgrounds and with different levels of expertise in the design, development, and evaluation and implementation of rule-based CAs in health care settings.

摘要

背景

对话代理(CA)或聊天机器人是模拟与人类对话的计算机程序。CA 在医疗保健环境中的使用是最近才开始的,而且发展迅速,这往往导致 CA 开发和评估过程的报告不佳,以及研究结果不可靠。我们开发并发布了一个概念框架,用于设计、开发、评估和实施基于规则的智能手机对话代理(DISCOVER),该代理由 CA 设计、开发和评估实施的 3 个迭代阶段组成,并辅以 2 个交叉主题(以用户为中心的设计和数据隐私与安全)。

目的

本研究旨在与医疗保健 CA 领域的多学科专家进行深入的半结构化访谈,分享他们对医疗保健 CA 的定义和分类的看法,并评估和验证 DISCOVER 概念框架。

方法

我们使用基于框架的访谈指南,通过 Zoom(Zoom Video Communications)与 12 名多学科 CA 专家进行一对一的半结构化访谈。访谈由研究团队进行录音、转录,并使用主题分析进行分析。

结果

根据参与者的意见,我们将 CA 定义为使用自然语言通过 ≥1 种通信方式(如文本、语音、图像或视频)进行同步对话的数字接口。CA 按 13 个类别分类:响应生成方法、输入和输出方式、CA 目的、部署平台、CA 开发方式、外观、交互长度、CA-用户交互类型、对话启动、沟通风格、CA 个性、人工支持和医疗干预类型。专家们认为,该概念框架可以适应基于人工智能的 CA。然而,尽管人工智能技术取得了最新进展,包括大型语言模型,但该技术在医疗保健环境中仍无法确保安全性和可靠性。最后,根据参与者的反馈,我们提出了一个经过更新迭代的医疗保健对话代理(CHAT)概念框架,其中包含了 CA 设计、开发和评估实施的关键考虑因素,并辅以 3 个交叉主题:伦理、用户参与和数据隐私与安全。

结论

我们提出了一个扩展的、经过验证的 CHAT,并旨在为来自不同背景和不同专业水平的研究人员提供指导,帮助他们在医疗保健环境中设计、开发和评估基于规则的 CA。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6bb/10652195/d716b9cb2761/jmir_v25i1e50767_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6bb/10652195/f3063a044eb7/jmir_v25i1e50767_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6bb/10652195/e564dd19c43d/jmir_v25i1e50767_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6bb/10652195/88b5ab7230eb/jmir_v25i1e50767_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6bb/10652195/d716b9cb2761/jmir_v25i1e50767_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6bb/10652195/f3063a044eb7/jmir_v25i1e50767_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6bb/10652195/e564dd19c43d/jmir_v25i1e50767_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6bb/10652195/88b5ab7230eb/jmir_v25i1e50767_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6bb/10652195/d716b9cb2761/jmir_v25i1e50767_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Conversational Agents in Health Care: Expert Interviews to Inform the Definition, Classification, and Conceptual Framework.医疗保健中的会话代理:专家访谈以提供定义、分类和概念框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 1;25:e50767. doi: 10.2196/50767.
2
Designing, Developing, Evaluating, and Implementing a Smartphone-Delivered, Rule-Based Conversational Agent (DISCOVER): Development of a Conceptual Framework.设计、开发、评估和实施基于规则的智能手机对话代理(DISCOVER):概念框架的开发。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):e38740. doi: 10.2196/38740.
3
Developing a Technical-Oriented Taxonomy to Define Archetypes of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Literature Review and Cluster Analysis.开发面向技术的分类法以定义医疗保健中对话代理的原型:文献综述和聚类分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 30;25:e41583. doi: 10.2196/41583.
4
Evaluation of the Current State of Chatbots for Digital Health: Scoping Review.评估数字健康领域的聊天机器人现状:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 19;25:e47217. doi: 10.2196/47217.
5
The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review.人工智能对话代理在医疗保健中的有效性:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 22;22(10):e20346. doi: 10.2196/20346.
6
Framework for Guiding the Development of High-Quality Conversational Agents in Healthcare.医疗保健领域高质量对话代理开发指南框架
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 7;11(8):1061. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081061.
7
Language Use in Conversational Agent-Based Health Communication: Systematic Review.基于对话代理的健康传播中的语言使用:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 8;24(7):e37403. doi: 10.2196/37403.
8
Designing Depression Screening Chatbots.设计抑郁症筛查聊天机器人。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Dec 15;284:259-263. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210719.
9
Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Behavior Change Model for Designing Artificial Intelligence Chatbots to Promote Physical Activity and a Healthy Diet: Viewpoint.人工智能聊天机器人行为改变模型设计人工智能聊天机器人促进身体活动和健康饮食:观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 30;22(9):e22845. doi: 10.2196/22845.
10
Empathic Conversational Agent Platform Designs and Their Evaluation in the Context of Mental Health: Systematic Review.共情式对话代理平台设计及其在心理健康领域的评估:系统评价。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Sep 9;11:e58974. doi: 10.2196/58974.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the practicality of using freely available AI-based GPT tools for coach learning and athlete development.评估使用免费的基于人工智能的GPT工具促进教练学习和运动员发展的实用性。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jul 29;7:1627685. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1627685. eCollection 2025.
2
Conversational agents for pharmaceutical use: insights from the eCCo database.用于制药的对话代理:来自eCCo数据库的见解。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01948-6.
3
Mobile health intervention CanRelax reduces distress in people with cancer in a randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating Conversational Agents for Mental Health: Scoping Review of Outcomes and Outcome Measurement Instruments.评估心理健康对话代理:结果和结果测量工具的范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 19;25:e44548. doi: 10.2196/44548.
2
Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models.ChatGPT在美国医师执照考试中的表现:使用大语言模型进行人工智能辅助医学教育的潜力。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Feb 9;2(2):e0000198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
ChatGPT passing USMLE shines a spotlight on the flaws of medical education.
移动健康干预措施CanRelax在一项随机对照试验中减轻了癌症患者的痛苦。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 10;8(1):269. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01688-x.
4
Conversational Agents to Support Pain Management: A Scoping Review.支持疼痛管理的对话代理:一项范围综述
Eur J Pain. 2025 May;29(5):e70016. doi: 10.1002/ejp.70016.
5
Individual differences in views toward healthcare conversational agents: A cross-sectional survey study.对医疗对话代理看法的个体差异:一项横断面调查研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 20;11:20552076241311066. doi: 10.1177/20552076241311066. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Large language models for the mental health community: framework for translating code to care.面向心理健康领域的大语言模型:从代码到关怀的转化框架。
Lancet Digit Health. 2025 Apr;7(4):e282-e285. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00255-3. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
ChatGPT 通过美国医师执照考试凸显了医学教育的缺陷。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Feb 9;2(2):e0000205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000205. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Designing, Developing, Evaluating, and Implementing a Smartphone-Delivered, Rule-Based Conversational Agent (DISCOVER): Development of a Conceptual Framework.设计、开发、评估和实施基于规则的智能手机对话代理(DISCOVER):概念框架的开发。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):e38740. doi: 10.2196/38740.
5
Development of RehaBot-A Conversational Agent for Promoting Rewarding Activities in Users With Traumatic Brain Injury.RehaBot 的开发——一种用于促进创伤性脑损伤患者有益活动的会话代理。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(3):144-151. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000770. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
6
Chatbot-Delivered Psychotherapy for Adults With Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression.针对有抑郁和焦虑症状成年人的聊天机器人心理治疗:一项系统评价与元回归分析
Behav Ther. 2022 Mar;53(2):334-347. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
7
Conversational Agent for Healthy Lifestyle Behavior Change: Web-Based Feasibility Study.用于健康生活方式行为改变的对话代理:基于网络的可行性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Dec 3;5(12):e27956. doi: 10.2196/27956.
8
Public Perceptions of Diabetes, Healthy Living, and Conversational Agents in Singapore: Needs Assessment.新加坡公众对糖尿病、健康生活及对话代理的认知:需求评估
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Nov 11;5(11):e30435. doi: 10.2196/30435.
9
The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care.当前医疗保健中可解释人工智能方法的虚假希望。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Nov;3(11):e745-e750. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00208-9.
10
A Comparison of Artificial Intelligence and Human Doctors for the Purpose of Triage and Diagnosis.用于分诊和诊断目的的人工智能与人类医生的比较
Front Artif Intell. 2020 Nov 30;3:543405. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.543405. eCollection 2020.