• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人创伤性脑损伤的管理——一项全国性横断面研究。

Management of traumatic brain injury in adult-A cross-sectional national study.

作者信息

Modin Albert, Wickbom Fredrik, Kamis Christian, Undén Johan

机构信息

Department of Surgery Hallands Hospital Halmstad Sweden.

Department of Operation and Intensive Care Hallands Hospital Halmstad Sweden.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 30;6(11):e1651. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1651. eCollection 2023 Nov.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.1651
PMID:37915367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10616643/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common cause for seeking care. Previous studies have shown considerable variations in TBI management. New guidelines may have influenced management routines.

METHODS

This is a descriptive cross-sectional study, collecting data through structured questionnaires. All Swedish emergency hospitals that manage and treat adult patients with mTBI (Reaction Level Scale [RLS] 1-3, Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] 13-15, age > 18 years) for the initial 24 h after injury were included in this study.

RESULTS

The response rate among hospitals fulfilling the study criteria's was 61/67 (91%). We observed a distinct predominance of nonspecialists being responsible for the initial management of these patients, with general surgeons and ED-physicians being the dominating specialties. A total of 45/61 (74%) of the hospitals use a guideline when managing TBI, with 12 hospitals (20%) stating that no guideline was used.

CONCLUSION

In general, established guidelines are used for the management of TBI in Sweden. However, some of these are outdated and several hospitals used local guidelines not based upon reliable evidence-based methodology. Most patients with TBI are managed by nonspecialist doctors, stressing the need of a reliable guideline.

摘要

背景

轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)是寻求治疗的常见原因。先前的研究表明,创伤性脑损伤的管理存在很大差异。新的指南可能影响了管理流程。

方法

这是一项描述性横断面研究,通过结构化问卷收集数据。本研究纳入了所有在瑞典对成年mTBI患者(反应水平量表[RLS]1-3,格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS]13-15,年龄>18岁)受伤后最初24小时进行管理和治疗的急诊医院。

结果

符合研究标准的医院的回复率为61/67(91%)。我们观察到,这些患者的初始管理主要由非专科医生负责,普通外科医生和急诊科医生是主要的专科。共有45/61(74%)的医院在管理TBI时使用指南,12家医院(20%)表示未使用指南。

结论

总体而言,瑞典在TBI管理中使用既定指南。然而,其中一些指南已经过时,几家医院使用的是基于不可靠的循证方法的当地指南。大多数TBI患者由非专科医生管理,这凸显了可靠指南的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b5/10616643/f2231abf2324/HSR2-6-e1651-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b5/10616643/ae18d9bfaecc/HSR2-6-e1651-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b5/10616643/85f8ba7837d5/HSR2-6-e1651-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b5/10616643/7f7253b9d2e6/HSR2-6-e1651-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b5/10616643/f2231abf2324/HSR2-6-e1651-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b5/10616643/ae18d9bfaecc/HSR2-6-e1651-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b5/10616643/85f8ba7837d5/HSR2-6-e1651-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b5/10616643/7f7253b9d2e6/HSR2-6-e1651-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b5/10616643/f2231abf2324/HSR2-6-e1651-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Management of traumatic brain injury in adult-A cross-sectional national study.成人创伤性脑损伤的管理——一项全国性横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 30;6(11):e1651. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1651. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Management of paediatric traumatic brain injury in Sweden: a national cross-sectional survey.瑞典儿科创伤性脑损伤管理:一项全国性横断面调查。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 May 12;30(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01022-4.
3
Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury at the Emergency Department and Hospital Admission in Europe: A Survey of 71 Neurotrauma Centers Participating in the CENTER-TBI Study.欧洲急诊科和医院收治的轻度创伤性脑损伤的管理:对参与CENTER-TBI研究的71个神经创伤中心的调查
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Sep 1;34(17):2529-2535. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4919. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
4
Neuropathology of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Correlation to Neurocognitive and Neurobehavioral Findings轻度创伤性脑损伤的神经病理学:与神经认知和神经行为结果的相关性
5
Exploring Serum Biomarkers for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury探索轻度创伤性脑损伤的血清生物标志物
6
Detection of neurofilament-H in serum as a diagnostic tool to predict injury severity in patients who have suffered mild traumatic brain injury.检测血清中的神经丝蛋白-H作为预测轻度创伤性脑损伤患者损伤严重程度的诊断工具。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;121(5):1232-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132474. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
7
Circadian variability of the initial Glasgow Coma Scale score in traumatic brain injury patients.创伤性脑损伤患者初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的昼夜变异性。
Neurobiol Sleep Circadian Rhythms. 2016 Oct 11;2:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.nbscr.2016.09.002. eCollection 2017 Jan.
8
North American survey on the post-neuroimaging management of children with mild head injuries.北美关于轻度头部受伤儿童神经影像学检查后处理的调查。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019 Feb 1;23(2):227-235. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.PEDS18263. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
9
The acute care surgery model: managing traumatic brain injury without an inpatient neurosurgical consultation.急症外科模式:在没有神经外科住院会诊的情况下治疗创伤性脑损伤。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):102-5; discussion 105. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182946667.
10
Assessment of Follow-up Care After Emergency Department Presentation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion: Results From the TRACK-TBI Study.急诊轻度创伤性脑损伤和脑震荡后随访护理评估:TRACK-TBI 研究结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 May 18;1(1):e180210. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0210.

本文引用的文献

1
Can serum biomarkers be used to rule out significant intracranial pathology in emergency department patients with mild traumatic brain injury? A Systemic Review & Meta-Analysis.血清生物标志物能否用于排除急诊科轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的严重颅内病变?系统评价与荟萃分析。
Injury. 2022 Feb;53(2):259-271. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.10.015. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
2
S100B, GFAP, UCH-L1 and NSE as predictors of abnormalities on CT imaging following mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.S100B、GFAP、UCH-L1 和 NSE 作为轻度创伤性脑损伤后 CT 成像异常的预测因子:诊断测试准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Apr;45(2):1171-1193. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01678-z. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
3
Postconcussion Symptoms After an Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Older Adults: Frequency, Risk Factors, and Impact on Quality of Life.老年人单纯轻度创伤性脑损伤后脑震荡后症状:频率、危险因素和对生活质量的影响。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(5):278-284. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000733. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of prehospital serum S100B and GFAP in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational multicenter cohort study - "the PreTBI I study".院前血清 S100B 和 GFAP 对轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的诊断准确性:一项前瞻性观察性多中心队列研究——“PreTBI I 研究”。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 2;29(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00891-5.
5
Reducing unnecessary CT scan of the head for minor paediatric head injuries at the emergency department.减少急诊科小儿头部轻微外伤的不必要 CT 扫描。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000973.
6
Personal Factors Associated With Postconcussion Symptoms 3 Months After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.与轻度创伤性脑损伤后 3 个月的脑震荡后症状相关的个人因素。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jun;102(6):1102-1112. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.106. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
7
The addition of S100B to guidelines for management of mild head injury is potentially cost saving.将S100B纳入轻度头部损伤管理指南可能会节省成本。
BMC Neurol. 2016 Oct 20;16(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0723-z.
8
Validation of the Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild and moderate traumatic brain injury in adults.斯堪的纳维亚成人轻度、中度和重度创伤性脑损伤初始管理指南的验证
BMC Med. 2015 Dec 9;13:292. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0533-y.
9
S100B levels are affected by older age but not by alcohol intoxication following mild traumatic brain injury.S100B水平受年龄增长影响,但不受轻度创伤性脑损伤后酒精中毒的影响。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013 Jul 6;21:52. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-52.
10
Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries in adults: an evidence and consensus-based update.斯堪的纳维亚成人轻微、轻度和中度头部损伤初步处理指南:基于证据和共识的更新。
BMC Med. 2013 Feb 25;11:50. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-50.