• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症外科患者肺动脉导管相关感染的风险与检测

Risk and detection of pulmonary artery catheter-related infection in septic surgical patients.

作者信息

Hudson-Civetta J A, Civetta J M, Martinez O V, Hoffman T A

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1987 Jan;15(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198701000-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-198701000-00006
PMID:3792012
Abstract

Specimen cultures were evaluated in 49 catheterized patients who had a known focus of infection (primarily intra-abdominal peritonitis). Bacteria were recovered from 2% of flush solutions, 14% of transducer domes, 18% of diaphragms, and 24% of cardiac output fluids; however, these bacteria were not found in cultures of the pulmonary artery (PA) catheter segments. The rates of positive PA catheter-aspirate cultures were 30.6% on day 1, 20.4% on day 2, and 32.7% on day 3 (not statistically different). PA catheter-aspirate cultures had a sensitivity of 5.7% and a positive predictive value of 30% for catheter-related infection, and 15% sensitivity and 40% positive predictive value for peripheral bacteremia. While 95% (55 of 58) of the catheter-aspirate cultures were false-positives, only 0.5% (3 of 588) were true-positives. Peripheral blood cultures were positive in 10% of the patients, but the catheter segments were sterile or grew different organisms. Arterial line cultures had zero sensitivity and predictive value to detect catheter-related infection, and 15% sensitivity and 40% predictive value to detect peripheral bacteremia. Thus, PA catheter-aspirate cultures, routine peripheral blood cultures, and arterial cultures cannot be recommended to detect PA catheter-related infection. Catheter-related infection confirmed by catheter-segment cultures was 10.2% when the PA catheters were removed after 73 +/- 6.5 (SD) h. Bacteria from catheter-segment cultures corresponded to those from the primary infection site.

摘要

对49例有已知感染灶(主要是腹腔内腹膜炎)的留置导管患者的标本培养物进行了评估。在2%的冲洗液、14%的传感器探头、18%的隔膜和24%的心排液中发现了细菌;然而,在肺动脉(PA)导管段培养物中未发现这些细菌。PA导管抽吸物培养物第1天的阳性率为30.6%,第2天为20.4%,第3天为32.7%(无统计学差异)。PA导管抽吸物培养物对导管相关感染的敏感性为5.7%,阳性预测值为30%,对外周菌血症的敏感性为15%,阳性预测值为40%。虽然95%(58例中的55例)的导管抽吸物培养为假阳性,但只有0.5%(588例中的3例)为真阳性。10%的患者外周血培养呈阳性,但导管段无菌生长或生长出不同的微生物。动脉导管培养物对检测导管相关感染的敏感性和预测值为零,对检测外周菌血症的敏感性为15%,预测值为40%。因此,不推荐用PA导管抽吸物培养、常规外周血培养和动脉培养来检测PA导管相关感染。当PA导管在73±6.5(标准差)小时后拔除时,经导管段培养确诊的导管相关感染率为10.2%。导管段培养出的细菌与原发感染部位的细菌一致。

相似文献

1
Risk and detection of pulmonary artery catheter-related infection in septic surgical patients.脓毒症外科患者肺动脉导管相关感染的风险与检测
Crit Care Med. 1987 Jan;15(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198701000-00006.
2
Catheter colonization and bacteremia with pulmonary and arterial catheters.导管定植以及肺动脉导管和动脉导管相关菌血症
Crit Care Med. 1982 Nov;10(11):736-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198211000-00007.
3
Semiquantitative culture of subcutaneous segment for conservative diagnosis of intravascular catheter-related infection.皮下段半定量培养用于血管内导管相关感染的保守诊断
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2000 Jul-Aug;24(4):210-4. doi: 10.1177/0148607100024004210.
4
Qualitative intravascular catheter tip cultures do not predict catheter-related bacteremia.定性血管内导管尖端培养不能预测导管相关菌血症。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 May-Jun;13(3):223-6. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(90)90063-2.
5
Pathogenesis and predictability of central venous catheter sepsis.
Surgery. 1982 Apr;91(4):383-9.
6
The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters: a prospective study utilizing molecular subtyping.肺动脉漂浮导管相关感染的发病机制与流行病学:一项利用分子分型的前瞻性研究
Am J Med. 1991 Sep 16;91(3B):197S-205S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90369-9.
7
Predictive value of surveillance skin and hub cultures in central venous catheters sepsis.中心静脉导管败血症中监测性皮肤和导管接头培养的预测价值。
J Hosp Infect. 1988 Oct;12(3):191-8. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(88)90006-0.
8
The challenge of anticipating catheter tip colonization in major heart surgery patients in the intensive care unit: are surface cultures useful?预测重症监护病房中心脏大手术患者导管尖端定植的挑战:表面培养有用吗?
Crit Care Med. 2005 Sep;33(9):1953-60. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000171842.63887.c1.
9
Indwelling umbilical arterial catheter: a preferred sampling site for blood culture.留置脐动脉导管:血培养的首选采样部位。
Pediatrics. 1988 Jun;81(6):821-5.
10
Clinical utility of blood cultures drawn from central venous or arterial catheters in critically ill surgical patients.从中心静脉或动脉导管采集的血培养在重症外科患者中的临床应用价值。
Crit Care Med. 2002 Jan;30(1):7-13. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200201000-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of using an indwelling introducer on diagnosis of Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery catheter colonization.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Jan;15(1):71-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01586188.
2
Central venous catheter infections: concepts and controversies.中心静脉导管感染:概念与争议
Intensive Care Med. 1995 Feb;21(2):177-83. doi: 10.1007/BF01726542.
3
Catheter related infection. A plea for consensus with review and guidelines.导管相关感染。呼吁达成共识并进行综述与制定指南。
Intensive Care Med. 1988;14(5):503-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00263521.
4
The relevance of cultures of catheter-drawn blood and heparin-lock fluid to diagnose infection in hematologic patients.经导管抽取的血液和肝素帽封管液培养对血液病患者感染诊断的相关性。
Ann Hematol. 1992 Jan;64(1):28-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01811468.