• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国重度抑郁症药物治疗算法方案:有益与否?

Program of algorithm for pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder in China: Benefits or not?

作者信息

Zhu Yuncheng, Wang Fang, Wang Fan, Liu Hongmei, Guo Xiaoyun, Wang Zuowei, He Ruoqiao, Wu Xiaohui, Cao Lan, Wu Zhiguo, Peng Daihui, Fang Yiru

机构信息

Division of Mood Disorders, Shanghai Hongkou Mental Health Center, Shanghai, 200083, China.

Clinical Research Center, Division of Mood Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Oct 17;9(11):e20951. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20951. eCollection 2023 Nov.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20951
PMID:37920522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10618797/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This research was designed to investigate Algorithm Guided Treatment (AGT) and clinical traits for the prediction of antidepressant treatment outcomes in Chinese patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

This study included 581 patients who had reached treatment response and 406 patients remained non-responded observed after three months of treatment. Sociodemographic factors, clinical traits, and psychiatric rating scales for evaluating therapeutic responses between the two groups were compared. Logistic regression analysis was adopted to determine the risk factors of unresponsive to antidepressant (URA) in MDD. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized to compare the therapeutic response between AGT and treatment as usual (TAU).

RESULTS

Compared to the MDD responsive to antidepressant (RA) group, the URA group had significantly lower rates of the following clinical traits: married status, anxious distress, moderate to severe depressive symptoms, and higher rates of comorbidity ( < 0.05). Logistic Regression Analysis showed that eight clinical traits from psychiatric rating scales, such as anxious characteristics, were correlated positively with URA, while the other eight symptoms, such as autonomic symptoms, were negatively correlated. Time to symptomatic remission was longer in TAU without statistically significant ( = 0.11) by log-rank testing.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors may affect the therapeutic responses and compliance of patients, increasing the non-response risk for antidepressants. Therapeutic responses might be improved by increasing the clarification and elucidation of different symptom clusters of patients. Benefits on treatment response to AGT were not found in our study, indicating a one-size-fits-all approach may not work. We registered as a clinical trial at the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (No. NCT01764867) and obtained ethical approval 2012-42 from SMHC.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨算法引导治疗(AGT)及临床特征对中国重度抑郁症(MDD)患者抗抑郁治疗结局的预测作用。

方法

本研究纳入了581例达到治疗反应的患者以及406例治疗三个月后仍无反应的患者。比较了两组患者的社会人口学因素、临床特征以及评估治疗反应的精神科评定量表。采用逻辑回归分析确定MDD患者对抗抑郁药无反应(URA)的危险因素。利用Kaplan-Meier生存分析比较AGT与常规治疗(TAU)之间的治疗反应。

结果

与抗抑郁药反应性(RA)的MDD组相比,URA组在以下临床特征方面的发生率显著较低:婚姻状况、焦虑痛苦、中度至重度抑郁症状,且合并症发生率较高(<0.05)。逻辑回归分析显示,精神科评定量表中的八个临床特征,如焦虑特征,与URA呈正相关,而其他八个症状,如自主神经症状,则呈负相关。通过对数秩检验,TAU组症状缓解时间较长,但无统计学意义(=0.11)。

结论

这些因素可能影响患者的治疗反应和依从性,增加抗抑郁药无反应的风险。通过增加对患者不同症状群的明确和阐释,可能改善治疗反应。在我们的研究中未发现AGT对治疗反应有获益,表明一刀切的方法可能行不通。我们已在国际临床试验注册平台注册为一项临床试验(编号:NCT01764867),并于2012年获得上海交通大学医学院附属精神卫生中心伦理批准(批准号:2012 - 42)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab33/10618797/d283d954d52a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab33/10618797/a30b3d00706d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab33/10618797/fd417d27aaed/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab33/10618797/d283d954d52a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab33/10618797/a30b3d00706d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab33/10618797/fd417d27aaed/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab33/10618797/d283d954d52a/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Program of algorithm for pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder in China: Benefits or not?中国重度抑郁症药物治疗算法方案:有益与否?
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 17;9(11):e20951. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20951. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Evaluating the efficacy and moderators of algorithm-guided antidepressant treatments of major depressive disorder.评估算法指导的抗抑郁药治疗重度抑郁症的疗效和调节因素。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 15;297:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.011. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
3
Novel Augmentation Strategies in Major Depression.重度抑郁症的新型强化治疗策略
Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4).
4
Predictors of the effectiveness of an early medication change strategy in patients with major depressive disorder.预测早期药物调整策略对重度抑郁症患者疗效的影响因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2014-x.
5
Causes of drug discontinuation in patients with major depressive disorder in China.中国重度抑郁症患者停药的原因。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 10;96:109755. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109755. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
6
Comparing sensitivity to change using the 6-item versus the 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale in the GUIDED randomized controlled trial.在 GUIDED 随机对照试验中,使用 6 项和 17 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表评估变化敏感性的比较。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2410-2.
7
Comparative effectiveness of continuation and maintenance treatments for persistent depressive disorder in adults.成人持续性抑郁症延续治疗和维持治疗的比较效果
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 20;5(5):CD012855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012855.pub2.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Characterising anxiety in major depressive disorder and its use in predicting antidepressant treatment outcome: An iSPOT-D report.描述重性抑郁障碍中的焦虑及其在预测抗抑郁治疗结局中的作用:iSPOT-D 报告。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;53(8):782-793. doi: 10.1177/0004867419835933. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
Effect of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Drug-Gene Interactions on Medication Selection and Remission of Symptoms in Major Depressive Disorder: The PRIME Care Randomized Clinical Trial.药物基因相互作用的药物基因组检测对重度抑郁症患者药物选择和症状缓解的影响:PRIME Care 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Jul 12;328(2):151-161. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.9805.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Guideline (CANMAT 2016) Discordance of Medications for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder in China.临床指南(CANMAT 2016):中国重度抑郁症患者用药的不一致性
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Apr 12;19:829-839. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S401359. eCollection 2023.
2
Development and Preliminary Validation of the 6-Item Short Form of the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire.开发并初步验证威斯康星结石生活质量问卷 6 项简短版。
Urology. 2023 Jul;177:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.03.032. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
3
Biochemical and Endocrine Parameters for the Discrimination and Calibration of Bipolar Disorder or Major Depressive Disorder.
用于双相情感障碍或重度抑郁症鉴别与校准的生化和内分泌参数
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 20;13:875141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.875141. eCollection 2022.
4
Employing biochemical biomarkers for building decision tree models to predict bipolar disorder from major depressive disorder.运用生化生物标志物构建决策树模型,以从重度抑郁症预测双相情感障碍。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 1;308:190-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.080. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
5
Psychometric and Clinical Evaluation of the Clinician (VQIDS-C) and Self-Report (VQIDS-SR) Versions of the Very Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms.抑郁症状快速问卷临床医生版(VQIDS-C)和自评版(VQIDS-SR)的心理测量与临床评估
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022 Feb 17;18:289-302. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S342457. eCollection 2022.
6
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 vs. the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in Assessing Major Depressive Disorder.患者健康问卷-9与汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表在评估重度抑郁症中的比较
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 4;12:747139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.747139. eCollection 2021.
7
Difference in the regulation of biological rhythm symptoms of Major depressive disorder between escitalopram and mirtazapine.艾司西酞普兰与米氮平对重度抑郁症患者生物节律症状调控的差异。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 1;296:258-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.050. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
8
Hypothalamic-Pituitary-End-Organ Axes: Hormone Function in Female Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.下丘脑-垂体-靶腺轴:女性重性抑郁障碍患者的激素功能。
Neurosci Bull. 2021 Aug;37(8):1176-1187. doi: 10.1007/s12264-021-00689-6. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
9
Predictors and moderators of quality of life in patients with major depressive disorder: An AGTs-MDD study report.重性抑郁障碍患者生活质量的预测因子和调节因素:AGTs-MDD 研究报告。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jun;138:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.03.063. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
10
Individual Differences in Response to Antidepressants: A Meta-analysis of Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trials.抗抑郁药反应的个体差异:安慰剂对照随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 May 1;78(5):490-497. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4564.