Suppr超能文献

SBRT 治疗脊柱转移瘤的疗效和安全性:为制定 ESTRO 实践指南进行的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of SBRT for spine metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis for preparation of an ESTRO practice guideline.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

ARNAS Civico Hospital, Radiation Oncology Unit, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2024 Jan;190:109969. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109969. Epub 2023 Nov 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Advances in characterizing cancer biology and the growing availability of novel targeted agents and immune therapeutics have significantly changed the prognosis of many patients with metastatic disease. Palliative radiotherapy needs to adapt to these developments. In this study, we summarize the available evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of spinal metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA methodology, including publications from January 2005 to September 2021, with the exception of the randomized phase III trial RTOG-0631 which was added in April 2023. Re-irradiation was excluded. For meta-analysis, a random-effects model was used to pool the data. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I-test, assuming substantial and considerable as I > 50 % and I > 75 %, respectively. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 69 studies assessing the outcomes of 7236 metastases in 5736 patients were analyzed. SBRT for spine metastases showed high efficacy, with a pooled overall pain response rate of 83 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 68 %-94 %), pooled complete pain response of 36 % (95 % CI: 20 %-53 %), and 1-year local control rate of 94 % (95 % CI: 86 %-99 %), although with high levels of heterogeneity among studies (I = 93 %, I = 86 %, and 86 %, respectively). Furthermore, SBRT was safe, with a pooled vertebral fracture rate of 9 % (95 % CI: 4 %-16 %), pooled radiation induced myelopathy rate of 0 % (95 % CI 0-2 %), and pooled pain flare rate of 6 % (95 % CI: 3 %-17 %), although with mixed levels of heterogeneity among the studies (I = 92 %, I = 0 %, and 95 %, respectively). Only 1.7 % of vertebral fractures required surgical stabilization.

CONCLUSION

Spine SBRT is characterized by a favorable efficacy and safety profile, providing durable results for pain control and disease control, which is particularly relevant for oligometastatic patients.

摘要

背景与目的

癌症生物学特征的进展以及新型靶向药物和免疫治疗药物的不断涌现,显著改变了许多转移性疾病患者的预后。姑息性放疗需要适应这些发展。在本研究中,我们总结了立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)治疗脊柱转移瘤的现有证据。

材料与方法

采用 PRISMA 方法进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,纳入 2005 年 1 月至 2021 年 9 月的文献,除外 2023 年 4 月纳入的随机 III 期 RTOG-0631 试验。排除再放疗。对于荟萃分析,采用随机效应模型汇总数据。采用 I 检验评估异质性,假设 I > 50%和 I > 75%分别为显著和高度显著。p 值 < 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共分析了 69 项研究的 7236 处转移灶(5736 例患者)的结果。SBRT 治疗脊柱转移瘤疗效显著,总体疼痛缓解率为 83%(95%置信区间 [CI]:68%-94%),完全缓解率为 36%(95% CI:20%-53%),1 年局部控制率为 94%(95% CI:86%-99%),但研究间存在高度异质性(I = 93%、I = 86%和 86%)。此外,SBRT 治疗是安全的,椎体骨折发生率为 9%(95% CI:4%-16%),放射性脊髓病发生率为 0%(95% CI:0-2%),疼痛加重发生率为 6%(95% CI:3%-17%),但研究间存在中度异质性(I = 92%、I = 0%和 95%)。仅 1.7%的椎体骨折需要手术稳定。

结论

脊柱 SBRT 具有良好的疗效和安全性,为疼痛控制和疾病控制提供持久的效果,这对于寡转移患者尤为重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验