• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以研究人员为研究对象的元研究识别:范围综述研究方案。

Identifying meta-research with researchers as study subjects: Protocol for a scoping review.

机构信息

NYU Health Sciences Library, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America.

Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0303905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303905. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0303905
PMID:38768101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11104640/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Meta-research in which researchers are the study subjects can illuminate how to better support researchers and enhance the development of research capacity. Comprehensively compiling the literature in this area can help define best practices for research capacity development and reveal gaps in the literature. However, there are challenges to assessing and synthesizing the breadth of the meta-research literature produced.

METHODS

In this article, we discuss the current barriers to conducting literature reviews on meta-research and strategies to address these barriers. We then outline proposed methods for conducting a scoping review on meta-research with researchers as study subjects.

DISCUSSION

Due to its interdisciplinary nature, broad scope, and difficult to pinpoint terminology, little is known about the state of meta-research with researchers as the study subjects. For this reason, there is a need for a scoping review that will identify research performed in which researchers were the study subjects.

摘要

背景

以研究人员为研究对象的元研究可以阐明如何更好地支持研究人员并增强研究能力的发展。全面编纂该领域的文献有助于确定研究能力发展的最佳实践,并揭示文献中的差距。然而,评估和综合元研究文献的广度存在挑战。

方法

在本文中,我们讨论了对元研究进行文献综述的当前障碍以及解决这些障碍的策略。然后,我们概述了对以研究人员为研究对象的元研究进行范围综述的拟议方法。

讨论

由于其跨学科性质、广泛的范围和难以确定的术语,对于以研究人员为研究对象的元研究的状况知之甚少。因此,需要进行范围综述,以确定以研究人员为研究对象进行的研究。

相似文献

1
Identifying meta-research with researchers as study subjects: Protocol for a scoping review.以研究人员为研究对象的元研究识别:范围综述研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0303905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303905. eCollection 2024.
2
A review protocol on research partnerships: a Coordinated Multicenter Team approach.研究伙伴关系综述:一种协调的多中心团队方法。
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 30;7(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0879-2.
3
Scoping review of review methodologies used for guiding evidence-based practice in critical care: a protocol.综述方法学在重症监护循证实践指导中的应用评价:方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 19;14(11):e082661. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082661.
4
Identifying the barriers and facilitators to culturally responsive HIV and PrEP screening for racial, ethnic, sexual, and gender minoritized patients: A scoping review protocol.确定针对少数族裔、种族、性和性别少数群体患者进行文化响应的 HIV 和 PrEP 筛查的障碍和促进因素:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2023 May 24;18(5):e0281173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281173. eCollection 2023.
5
Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.开展范围综述:护理学和助产学学生、临床医生、研究人员和学者的实用指南。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Apr;77(4):2102-2113. doi: 10.1111/jan.14743. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
What you need to know about scoping reviews.系统评价概述:您需要了解的内容
Medwave. 2021 Mar 30;21(2):e8144. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2021.02.8144.
7
Advancing scoping study methodology: a web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps.推进范围界定研究方法:基于网络的关于术语、定义和方法步骤认知的调查与咨询
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 26;16:305. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1579-z.
8
Hyperbaric exposure in rodents with non-invasive imaging assessment of decompression bubbles: A scoping review protocol.高压暴露在具有非侵入性成像评估减压气泡的啮齿动物中的应用:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0274241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274241. eCollection 2022.
9
Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol.系统评价实施、报告、出版和评价方法的指南:范围综述方案。
F1000Res. 2021 Aug 13;10:802. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.55108.1. eCollection 2021.
10
What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.对于开展医疗保健干预措施综述的研究者,有哪些可用的指南?一项范围综述和定性元总结。
Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 14;5(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0367-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Recognizing the value of meta-research and making it easier to find.认识到元研究的价值并使其更易于查找。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2023 Oct 2;111(4):839-843. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1758.
2
Recommendations and guidelines for creating scholarly biomedical journals: A scoping review.创建学术生物医学期刊的建议和指南:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 31;18(3):e0282168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282168. eCollection 2023.
3
Meta-research evaluating redundancy and use of systematic reviews when planning new studies in health research: a scoping review.元研究评估健康研究中新研究规划时系统评价的冗余和使用:范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 15;11(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02096-y.
4
Curricula, Teaching Methods, and Success Metrics of Clinician-Scientist Training Programs: A Scoping Review.临床科学家培训计划的课程设置、教学方法和成功指标:范围综述。
Acad Med. 2022 Sep 1;97(9):1403-1412. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004764. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
5
What is known about clinician researcher careers in allied health? A scoping review of the last decade.关于联合健康领域临床研究人员职业,我们了解多少?过去十年的范围综述。
J Health Organ Manag. 2022 Apr 25;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-12-2021-0441.
6
Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols.范围综述方案制定的最佳实践指南及报告项目
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):953-968. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00242.
7
Meta-research in pharmacy: Time for a look in the mirror.药学元研究:是时候照照镜子了。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Dec;17(12):2028-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
8
Dental Research Waste in Design, Analysis, and Reporting: A Scoping Review.口腔医学研究中的设计、分析和报告中的浪费问题:范围综述。
J Dent Res. 2021 Mar;100(3):245-252. doi: 10.1177/0022034520962751. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
9
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
10
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals.在生物医学期刊的稿件评审过程中,同行评审员的角色和任务:范围综述。
BMC Med. 2019 Jun 20;17(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1347-0.