Bawane Hemangi, Kadam Komal, Mahale Vinit, Kulkarni Ram
Symbiosis School of Biological Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune, India.
Electrophoresis. 2024 Mar;45(5-6):442-450. doi: 10.1002/elps.202300154. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
Staining and visualization of the nucleic acid bands on agarose gels using ethidium bromide (EB) has been a widely used technique in molecular biology. Although it is an efficient dye for this purpose, EB is known to be mutagenic and genotoxic in humans. This led to the emergence of various alternative dyes, which were claimed to be safer and more efficient than EB. However, these dyes portray varied sensitivity and interference with the electrophoretic mobility of nucleic acids. This work aimed at assessing ten nucleic acid-binding dyes and two prestained dyes for these properties by three staining techniques, such as precasting, preloading, and poststaining. Of these, preloading was not suitable for any of the dye while poststaining worked optimal for most of them. Precasting was suitable for only four dyes viz. DNA Stain G, SYBR™ safe, EZ-Vision in-gel, and LabSafe™. Poststaining was, in general, a costlier method than precasting. The work gives a comprehensive understanding of the performance of nucleic acid-binding dyes for routine molecular biology experiments.
使用溴化乙锭(EB)对琼脂糖凝胶上的核酸条带进行染色和可视化是分子生物学中广泛使用的技术。尽管它是用于此目的的一种有效染料,但已知EB对人类具有致突变性和基因毒性。这导致了各种替代染料的出现,据称这些替代染料比EB更安全、更高效。然而,这些染料表现出不同的灵敏度以及对核酸电泳迁移率的干扰。这项工作旨在通过三种染色技术(如预制、预加载和后染色)评估十种核酸结合染料和两种预染染料的这些特性。其中,预加载不适用于任何一种染料,而后染色对大多数染料效果最佳。预制仅适用于四种染料,即DNA Stain G、SYBR™ safe、EZ-Vision in-gel和LabSafe™。一般来说,后染色是一种比预制成本更高的方法。这项工作全面了解了核酸结合染料在常规分子生物学实验中的性能。