• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加利福尼亚少年司法系统的最低年龄:关于合作研究推动立法改革的经验教训。

A Minimum Age for California's Juvenile Legal System: Lessons on Collaborative Research to Drive Legislative Change.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(3):535-543.

PMID:37934451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10832849/
Abstract

THE PROBLEM

Most U.S. states lack a minimum age of juvenile legal jurisdiction, which leaves young children vulnerable to a harsh, punitive system that causes lifelong adverse health and social outcomes. However, partnership between academics, advocates, and policymakers can catalyze legislative change to set minimum ages.

PURPOSE OF ARTICLE

We, an academic pediatrician and social worker, describe our stakeholder-policymaker-academic partnered research that led to the passage of California Senate Bill 439, which excludes children under age 12 from eligibility for juvenile legal prosecution. To stimulate future efforts, we also describe how the initial partnership led to a national coalition through which we are partnering with stakeholders across the United States to influence minimum age laws nationwide.

KEY POINTS

Stakeholder-policymaker-academic partners can contribute synergistically in the research-to-policymaking process.

CONCLUSIONS

Through a stakeholder-policymaker-academic partnership, we were able to influence the passage of a minimum age law for the juvenile legal system in California. Lessons learned in this collaboration can be applied by researchers across disciplines who wish to influence policy.

摘要

问题

大多数美国州缺乏少年司法管辖权的最低年龄,这使得年幼的孩子容易受到严厉、惩罚性制度的伤害,从而导致终生不良的健康和社会后果。然而,学者、倡导者和政策制定者之间的合作可以促进立法改革,以设定最低年龄。

目的

我们,一位儿科医生和社会工作者,描述了我们的利益攸关方-政策制定者-学者合作研究,该研究导致了加州参议院法案 439 的通过,该法案将 12 岁以下的儿童排除在少年法律起诉的资格之外。为了激发未来的努力,我们还描述了最初的合作如何导致一个全国性联盟,通过该联盟,我们正在与美国各地的利益攸关方合作,以影响全国范围内的最低年龄法。

要点

利益攸关方-政策制定者-学者合作伙伴可以在研究到政策制定的过程中协同发挥作用。

结论

通过利益攸关方-政策制定者-学者的合作,我们成功地影响了加利福尼亚州少年司法系统最低年龄法的通过。这一合作中吸取的经验教训可以为希望影响政策的跨学科研究人员所应用。

相似文献

1
A Minimum Age for California's Juvenile Legal System: Lessons on Collaborative Research to Drive Legislative Change.加利福尼亚少年司法系统的最低年龄:关于合作研究推动立法改革的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(3):535-543.
2
Setting a minimum age for juvenile justice jurisdiction in California.设定加利福尼亚州少年司法管辖权的最低年龄。
Int J Prison Health. 2017 Mar 13;13(1):49-56. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-07-2016-0030.
3
Advocacy coalitions involved in California's menu labeling policy debate: Exploring coalition structure, policy beliefs, resources, and strategies.参与加利福尼亚州菜单标签政策辩论的倡导联盟:探索联盟结构、政策信念、资源和策略。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;177:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.036. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
4
Mobilizing for policy: using community-based participatory research to impose minimum packaging requirements on small cigars.推动政策制定:利用基于社区的参与性研究对小雪茄实施最低包装要求。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Summer;6(2):205-12. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0027.
5
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.实施健康研究参与策略的伦理挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
6
Integrating research, legal technical assistance, and advocacy to inform shared use legislation in Mississippi.整合研究、法律技术援助和宣传,为密西西比州的共享使用立法提供信息。
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(3 Suppl):S100-3. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130430-ARB-209.
7
Examining the Role and Strategies of Advocacy Coalitions in California's Statewide Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Debate (2001-2018).审视倡导联盟在加利福尼亚州全州含糖饮料税辩论(2001-2018 年)中的作用和策略。
Am J Health Promot. 2024 Jan;38(1):101-111. doi: 10.1177/08901171231201007. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
8
Constituent-driven health policy informed by policy advocacy literature.由政策倡导文献提供信息的选民驱动型卫生政策。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 May 13;13(5):338-342. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac116.
9
Evaluating the Implementation of a Collaborative Juvenile Reentry System in Oakland, California.评估加利福尼亚州奥克兰市一个青少年重返社会协作系统的实施情况。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Sep;62(12):3662-3680. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18755480. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
10
School Meals for All: A Qualitative Study Exploring Lessons in Successful Advocacy and Policymaking in Maine and California.全民学校供餐:一项关于缅因州和加利福尼亚州成功倡导和政策制定经验的定性研究。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2024 Dec;124(12):1580-1589. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2024.04.018. Epub 2024 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing antiracist research: addressing health inequities among juvenile legal system-impacted youth using Public Health Critical Race Praxis.推进反种族主义研究:运用公共卫生批判种族实践解决受少年司法系统影响的青少年的健康不平等问题。
Health Justice. 2025 Jul 9;13(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40352-025-00346-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Setting a US National Minimum Age for Juvenile Justice Jurisdiction.设定美国少年司法管辖权的全国最低年龄标准。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Jul 1;175(7):665-666. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0244.
2
Addressing Child Mental Health by Creating a National Minimum Age for Juvenile Justice Jurisdiction.通过设立未成年人司法管辖权的国家最低年龄来解决儿童心理健康问题。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;60(11):1337-1339. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.02.019. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
3
Advocacy and Collaborative Health Care for Justice-Involved Youth.倡导和协作式医疗保健服务以满足涉法青少年的需求。
Pediatrics. 2020 Jul;146(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1755. Epub 2020 May 6.
4
Linking Juvenile Justice Research to Policy Action: Engaging Community Partners and Policy Makers to Achieve Change.将青少年司法研究与政策行动联系起来:让社区合作伙伴和政策制定者参与以实现变革。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 1;174(4):315-316. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5875.
5
What Is the Relationship Between Incarceration of Children and Adult Health Outcomes?儿童监禁与成人健康结果之间的关系是什么?
Acad Pediatr. 2019 Apr;19(3):342-350. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
6
Child incarceration and long-term adult health outcomes: a longitudinal study.儿童监禁与成人长期健康结果:一项纵向研究。
Int J Prison Health. 2018 Mar 12;14(1):26-33. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-09-2016-0052.
7
Setting a minimum age for juvenile justice jurisdiction in California.设定加利福尼亚州少年司法管辖权的最低年龄。
Int J Prison Health. 2017 Mar 13;13(1):49-56. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-07-2016-0030.
8
The promise of community-based participatory research for health equity: a conceptual model for bridging evidence with policy.基于社区的参与式研究对健康公平的承诺:将证据与政策联系起来的概念模型。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104(9):1615-23. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301961. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
9
A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers.政策制定者使用证据的障碍与促进因素的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 3;14:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2.
10
"Research" in community-partnered, participatory research.社区合作参与式研究中的“研究”
JAMA. 2009 Jul 15;302(3):320-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1033.