Suppr超能文献

子宫内膜液生物标志物及其作为胚胎成功着床预测指标的潜力。

Endometrial fluid biomarkers and their potential as predictors of successful embryo implantation.

作者信息

Alves Ana R, Dias Margarida F, Silvestre Margarida

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal.

Gynecology Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Gynecology Department, Hospital and University Centre of Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Biomedicine (Taipei). 2023 Sep 1;13(3):1-8. doi: 10.37796/2211-8039.1413. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Embryo implantation is a complex biological process which requires synchronized dialogue between the receptive endometrium and the blastocyst. The endometrium, however, is only receptive to embryo implantation for a very short period. Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is a major challenge in assisted reproductive techniques mainly due to impaired receptivity, but there is still a need for a reliable and valid clinical test to assess endometrial receptiveness, especially at embryo transfer time. The aim of this review is to investigate what is currently known about the contribution of endometrial fluid (EF) to endometrial receptivity by identifying its potential biomarkers.

METHODS

This study involved an extensive search of the electronic databases PubMed and Cochrane, covering the period from 2011 to 2022. A combination of Medical Subject Headings with the terms 'endometrial fluid' and 'embryo implantation' was used.

RESULTS

Several different proteins presented in the endometrial cavity fluid have been described but the most consistent as potential biomarkers were Proprotein Convertase 6 (PC6), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), PIGF (Placental growth factor), β3 integrin, Colony Stimulating Factor-3 (CSF-3), Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), glycodelin and extracellular vesicles (EVs).

CONCLUSIONS

Strong indicators support the use of uterine fluid collection as a non-invasive tool for receptivity assessment. Therefore, it could improve outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques.

摘要

背景

胚胎着床是一个复杂的生物学过程,需要子宫内膜容受性与囊胚之间进行同步对话。然而,子宫内膜仅在很短的时间内具有胚胎着床容受性。反复着床失败(RIF)是辅助生殖技术中的一个主要挑战,主要原因是容受性受损,但仍需要一种可靠且有效的临床试验来评估子宫内膜容受性,尤其是在胚胎移植时。本综述的目的是通过识别其潜在生物标志物来研究目前已知的子宫内膜液(EF)对子宫内膜容受性的贡献。

方法

本研究广泛检索了2011年至2022年期间的电子数据库PubMed和Cochrane。使用医学主题词与“子宫内膜液”和“胚胎着床”等术语相结合的方式进行检索。

结果

已经描述了子宫内膜腔液中存在的几种不同蛋白质,但作为潜在生物标志物最一致的是前蛋白转化酶6(PC6)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、胎盘生长因子(PIGF)、β3整合素、集落刺激因子-3(CSF-3)、白血病抑制因子(LIF)、糖蛋白17和细胞外囊泡(EVs)。

结论

有力的指标支持将收集子宫液作为一种用于评估容受性的非侵入性工具。因此,它可以改善辅助生殖技术的结局。

相似文献

1
Endometrial fluid biomarkers and their potential as predictors of successful embryo implantation.
Biomedicine (Taipei). 2023 Sep 1;13(3):1-8. doi: 10.37796/2211-8039.1413. eCollection 2023.
3
Development of a high-throughput assay for human proprotein convertase 5/6 for detecting uterine receptivity.
Anal Biochem. 2015 Apr 15;475:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2014.12.012. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
5
Mucosal biomarkers for endometrial receptivity: A promising yet underexplored aspect of reproductive medicine.
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2022 Feb;68(1):13-24. doi: 10.1080/19396368.2021.1985186. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
6
Human endometrial cell-type-specific RNA sequencing provides new insights into the embryo-endometrium interplay.
Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Oct 13;2022(4):hoac043. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac043. eCollection 2022.
8
Uterine fluid microRNAs are dysregulated in women with recurrent implantation failure.
Hum Reprod. 2022 Apr 1;37(4):734-746. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac019.
9
Ion channels in the endometrium: regulation of endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation.
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):517-29. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu006. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
10
Assessment of endometrial receptivity during implantation window in women with unexplained infertility.
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020 Oct;36(10):917-921. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2020.1727433. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
miR-381-3p contribution in mouse spontaneous abortion targeting VEGFA.
PeerJ. 2025 Jun 24;13:e19568. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19568. eCollection 2025.
2
Low pH induces amiloride-sensitive expression of leukemia inhibitory factor in endometrial cells.
J Reprod Dev. 2025 Jun 6;71(3):115-123. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2024-105. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
4

本文引用的文献

3
A review of the pathophysiology of recurrent implantation failure.
Fertil Steril. 2021 Dec;116(6):1436-1448. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.014. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
Biomolecular Markers of Recurrent Implantation Failure-A Review.
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 18;22(18):10082. doi: 10.3390/ijms221810082.
5
ART in Europe, 2017: results generated from European registries by ESHRE.
Hum Reprod Open. 2021 Aug 5;2021(3):hoab026. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoab026. eCollection 2021.
6
Determining Diagnostic Criteria of Unexplained Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Retrospective Study of Two Three or More Implantation Failure.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 22;12:619437. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.619437. eCollection 2021.
10
Characterizing the endometrial fluid cytokine profile in women with endometriosis.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Dec;37(12):2999-3006. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01989-y. Epub 2020 Oct 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验