Faculty of Global and Regional Studies, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.
Faculty of Engineering, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 8;18(11):e0287357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287357. eCollection 2023.
In environments with multiple predators, vulnerabilities associated with the spatial positions of group-living prey are non-uniform and depend on the hunting styles of the predators. Theoretically, coursing predators follow their prey over long distances and attack open areas, exposing individuals at the edge of the group to predation risk more than those at the center (marginal predation). In contrast, ambush predators lurk unnoticed by their prey and appear randomly anywhere in the group; therefore, isolated individuals in the group would be more vulnerable to predators. These positions of vulnerability to predation are expected to be taken by larger-bodied males. Moreover, dominant males presumably occupy the center of the safe group. However, identifying individuals at higher predation risk requires both simultaneous recording of predator location and direct observation of predation events; empirical observations leave ambiguity as to who is at risk. Instead, several theoretical methods (predation risk proxies) have been proposed to assess predation risk: (1) the size of the individual 'unlimited domain of danger' based on Voronoi tessellation, (2) the size of the 'limited domain of danger' based on predator detection distance, (3) peripheral/center position in the group (minimum convex polygon), (4) the number and direction of others in the vicinity (surroundedness), and (5) dyadic distances. We explored the age-sex distribution of individuals in at-risk positions within a wild baboon group facing predation risk from leopards, lions, and hyenas, using Global Positioning System collars. Our analysis of the location data from 26 baboons revealed that adult males were consistently isolated at the edge of the group in all predation risk proxies. Empirical evidence from previous studies indicates that adult male baboons are the most frequently preyed upon, and our results highlights the importance of spatial positioning in this.
在有多种捕食者的环境中,群体生活猎物的空间位置所带来的脆弱性是不均匀的,并且取决于捕食者的狩猎方式。理论上,追捕型捕食者会在长距离内追逐猎物,并攻击开阔区域,使群体边缘的个体比群体中心的个体更容易受到捕食风险的影响(边缘捕食)。相比之下,伏击型捕食者在猎物面前潜伏不动,会随机出现在群体中的任何地方;因此,群体中的孤立个体更容易受到捕食者的攻击。这些易受捕食的位置预计会被体型较大的雄性占据。此外,优势雄性大概会占据安全群体的中心位置。然而,要确定处于较高捕食风险中的个体,需要同时记录捕食者的位置并直接观察捕食事件;实际观察结果对于谁处于危险之中存在模糊性。因此,已经提出了几种理论方法(捕食风险代理)来评估捕食风险:(1)基于 Voronoi 细分的个体“无限危险域”的大小,(2)基于捕食者探测距离的“有限危险域”的大小,(3)群体中的外周/中心位置(最小凸多边形),(4)附近的个体数量和方向(包围度),以及(5)对偶距离。我们使用全球定位系统项圈探索了面临来自豹子、狮子和鬣狗捕食风险的野生狒狒群体中处于危险位置的个体的年龄-性别分布。我们对 26 只狒狒的位置数据进行了分析,结果显示,在所有捕食风险代理中,成年雄性始终孤立地处于群体的边缘。之前的研究提供的经验证据表明,成年雄性狒狒是最常被捕食的猎物,我们的研究结果突出了空间定位在这方面的重要性。