School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Department of Dermatology and Skin Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 8;13(11):e062306. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062306.
Head-to-head clinical trials are common in psoriasis, but scarce in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), making treatment comparisons between therapeutic classes difficult. This study describes the relative effectiveness of targeted synthetic (ts) and biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) through network meta-analysis (NMA).
A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in January 2020. Bayesian NMAs were conducted to compare treatments on Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and 36-item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey including Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores.
Ovid MEDLINE (including Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily),Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
Phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating patients with PsA receiving tsDMARDS, bDMARDs or placebo were included in the SLR; there was no restriction on outcomes.
Two independent researchers reviewed all citations. Data for studies meeting all inclusion criteria were extracted into a standardised Excel-based form by one reviewer and validated by a second reviewer. A third reviewer was consulted to resolve any discrepancies, as necessary. Risk of bias was assessed using the The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical effectiveness quality assessment checklist.
In total, 26 RCTs were included. For HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS and SF-36 MCS scores, intravenous tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitors generally ranked higher than most other classes of therapies available to treat patients with PsA. For almost all outcomes, several interleukin (IL)-23, IL-17A, subcutaneous TNF and IL-12/23 agents offered comparable improvement, while cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4, phosphodiesterase-4 and Janus kinase inhibitors often had the lowest efficacy.
While intravenous TNFs may provide some improvements in PROs relative to several other tsDMARDs and bDMARDs for the treatment of patients with PsA, differences between classes of therapies across outcomes were small.
在银屑病中,头对头临床试验很常见,但在银屑病关节炎(PsA)中却很少见,这使得治疗类别的治疗比较变得困难。本研究通过网络荟萃分析(NMA)描述靶向合成(ts)和生物(b)疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARDs)在患者报告结局(PROs)方面的相对疗效。
2020 年 1 月进行了系统文献回顾(SLR)。进行贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)比较治疗对健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI)和 36 项简短表格(SF-36)健康调查包括心理成分综合评分(MCS)和生理成分综合评分(PCS)的影响。
Ovid MEDLINE(包括 Epub 提前打印、处理中和其他非索引引文和每日更新)、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库。
包括接受 tsDMARDs、bDMARDs 或安慰剂治疗的 PsA 患者的 III 期随机对照试验(RCTs)被纳入 SLR;对结局没有限制。
两名独立研究人员审查了所有引用文献。符合所有纳入标准的研究数据由一名评审员提取到一个标准化的 Excel 表格中,并由第二名评审员验证。如有必要,第三名评审员将进行协商以解决任何差异。使用国家卫生与临床优化研究所临床有效性质量评估清单评估偏倚风险。
共纳入 26 项 RCT。对于 HAQ-DI、SF-36 PCS 和 SF-36 MCS 评分,静脉注射肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)α抑制剂通常比治疗 PsA 患者的其他大多数治疗类别具有更高的排名。对于几乎所有结局,几种白细胞介素(IL)-23、IL-17A、皮下 TNF 和 IL-12/23 药物提供了可比的改善,而细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞相关抗原 4、磷酸二酯酶-4 和 Janus 激酶抑制剂通常疗效最低。
虽然与几种其他 tsDMARDs 和 bDMARDs 相比,静脉注射 TNF 可能在 PROs 方面提供一些改善,但治疗类别的差异在各个结局之间很小。