Suppr超能文献

中国资本都会区的经济-就业-环境健康转移和内在不平等:混合方法研究。

The economy-employment-environmental health transfer and embedded inequities of China's capital metropolitan area: a mixed-methods study.

机构信息

The Center for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Regional Environment and Ecology, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing, China; State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Planning and Policy Simulation, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing, China.

State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Lancet Planet Health. 2023 Nov;7(11):e912-e924. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00218-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Metropolitan areas have complex trade linkages internally and externally. This complexity stimulates the unequal spatial transfer of environmental health consequences, economy, and employment embodied in internal trade or trade with the outside regions, resulting in unequal exchange. Existing research has rarely discussed this issue at a refined scale, hindering targeted inequity alleviation policies.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods study, focusing on the most polluted metropolitan area in the world, the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China, and developed an integrated modelling framework to downscale the analysis of the trade-driven unequal transfer of PM- related premature deaths, value added, and job opportunities to the city scale within Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei. The study couples a nested Multi-Regional Input-Output model table containing data from 13 Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei cities and 28 outer provinces in 2017 with a bottom-up emission inventory, value added and employment statistical data, the Weather Research and Forecasting-Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions, the Global Exposure Mortality Model, and human capital methods. We also constructed two indices measuring unequal exchanges between PM-related deaths and economic and employment gains embodied in trades between cities in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and trades with outside regions.

FINDINGS

The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region as a single entity shifted 14 985 (95% CI 12 800-16 948) net deaths to regions outside the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei through trade, most of which occurred in the central region of China. The industrial-based peripheral Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei cities suffered the most serious inequities when trading with other Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei cities and outside regions. While gaining equivalent local jobs, these industrial-based peripheral cities had 250% higher PM-related deaths (10·2 PM-related deaths for obtaining 1000 local jobs) than core cities (2·9 PM-related deaths for obtaining 1000 local jobs) and 57·7% higher PM-related deaths than agricultural-based peripheral cities (6·5 PM-related deaths for obtaining 1000 local jobs). While gaining equivalent value added, industrial-based peripheral cities had 50·6% higher PM-related deaths (¥13·9 of reduced human capital due to PM-related premature deaths to obtain ¥1000 local value added) than core cities (¥9·2 of reduced human capital due to PM-related premature deaths to obtain ¥1000 local value added) and 67·4% higher PM-related deaths than agricultural-based peripheral cities (¥8·3 of reduced human capital due to PM-related premature deaths to obtain ¥1000 local value added).

INTERPRETATION

Treating metropolitan areas as a single entity obscured internal heterogeneity, potentially misleading policy makers into imposing strict regulations on the whole metropolitan area to alleviate the inequities it posed on outside regions. However, several peripheral Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei cities were disadvantaged in their trade with core Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei cities and outside regions. Therefore, policies should be tailored for particular cities within metropolitan areas. Future targeted policies should include, but not be limited to, making ecological compensations and incorporating the environment and health costs into the price of pollution-intensive goods and services.

FUNDING

National Key Research and Devlopment Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation.

摘要

背景

大都市区在内部和外部都存在复杂的贸易联系。这种复杂性刺激了内部贸易或与外部地区贸易所体现的环境健康后果、经济和就业的不平等空间转移,导致了不平等交换。现有的研究很少在精细的尺度上讨论这个问题,从而阻碍了有针对性的不平等缓解政策的制定。

方法

我们进行了一项混合方法研究,重点是世界上污染最严重的大都市区——中国的京津冀地区,并开发了一个综合建模框架,将与 PM 相关的过早死亡、附加值和就业机会的贸易驱动的不平等转移分析细分为京津冀内部的城市规模。该研究结合了嵌套的多区域投入产出模型表,其中包含了来自京津冀 13 个城市和 2017 年 28 个外部省份的数据,以及自下而上的排放清单、附加值和就业统计数据、带有扩展功能的天气研究与预报-综合空气质量模型、全球暴露死亡率模型和人力资本方法。我们还构建了两个指标,分别衡量了京津冀内部城市之间的贸易和与外部地区的贸易中与 PM 相关的死亡和经济及就业收益之间的不平等交换。

结果

京津冀作为一个单一实体通过贸易向京津冀以外的地区转移了 14985 例(95%CI 12800-16948)净死亡,其中大部分发生在中国中部地区。以工业为基础的京津冀外围城市在与其他京津冀地区和外部地区进行贸易时,面临着最严重的不平等。虽然获得了同等的当地就业机会,但这些以工业为基础的外围城市的 PM 相关死亡人数比核心城市高出 250%(获得 1000 个当地就业机会,PM 相关死亡人数为 250 人),比以农业为基础的外围城市高出 57.7%(获得 1000 个当地就业机会,PM 相关死亡人数为 65 人)。在获得同等附加值的情况下,以工业为基础的外围城市的 PM 相关死亡人数比核心城市高出 50.6%(由于 PM 相关过早死亡,获得 1000 个当地附加值需要减少 1390 元的人力资本),比以农业为基础的外围城市高出 67.4%(由于 PM 相关过早死亡,获得 1000 个当地附加值需要减少 830 元的人力资本)。

解释

将大都市区视为一个单一实体掩盖了内部的异质性,这可能会误导政策制定者对整个大都市区实施严格的监管,以减轻其对外部地区的不平等影响。然而,京津冀的几个外围城市在与核心京津冀地区和外部地区的贸易中处于不利地位。因此,政策应该针对大都市区内的特定城市制定。未来有针对性的政策应包括但不限于生态补偿,并将环境和健康成本纳入污染密集型商品和服务的价格。

资助

国家重点研发计划、国家自然科学基金和江苏省自然科学基金。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验