• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促成因素对不良事件的效应量:一家教学医院的根本原因分析系列研究

Effect size of contributory factors on adverse events: an analysis of RCA series in a teaching hospital.

作者信息

Najafpour Zhila, Jafary Mohamadreza, Saeedi Morteza, Jeddian Alireza, Adibi Hossein

机构信息

Health care management, Department of Health Economics and Management, School of Public Health, Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Shariati Hospital,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2016 Jul 28;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s40200-016-0249-3. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1186/s40200-016-0249-3
PMID:27471680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4964171/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One of the most important concerns of health care systems in the world is the patient safety issues. Root Cause Analysis is a systematic process for identifying root causes and contributory factors of problems or events. The objective of this study is to review RCA reports to determine the effect size of contributory factors on adverse events through an organizational perspective.

METHODS

This study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital in 2014. The process of root cause analysis was taken from National Patient Safety Agency framework. We calculated descriptive statistics to determine the frequency distribution of contributory factors on each adverse event.

RESULTS

Having the process of 16 adverse events reviewed, 38 care or service delivery problems were identified which showed that 317 contributory factors and underlying causes had led to these problems. Accordingly, the most important contributory factors included the following: Task factors (20 %), education and training factors (16 %), communication factors (14 %), and team and social factors (13 %).

CONCLUSIONS

RCA is an effective method of problem solving used for identifying the root causes of initial errors and finding ways to prevent the recurrences. In this study, lack of effective communication skills of nurses and other clinical staff when interacting with colleague and communicating with patients, failure to comply with health care provision standards, lack of adequate supervision on implementation of clinical guidelines and issues related to the organizational culture were the main determining factors which have been considered for implementing preventive measures with regard to the hospital specifications.

摘要

背景

全球医疗保健系统最为关注的问题之一是患者安全问题。根本原因分析是一个用于识别问题或事件的根本原因及促成因素的系统过程。本研究的目的是通过组织视角回顾根本原因分析报告,以确定促成因素对不良事件的影响程度。

方法

本研究于2014年在一家三级护理教学医院开展。根本原因分析过程采用了国家患者安全机构的框架。我们计算了描述性统计数据,以确定每个不良事件中促成因素的频率分布。

结果

在对16起不良事件的过程进行审查后,识别出38个护理或服务提供问题,这表明317个促成因素和潜在原因导致了这些问题。因此,最重要的促成因素包括:任务因素(20%)、教育与培训因素(16%)、沟通因素(14%)以及团队与社会因素(13%)。

结论

根本原因分析是一种有效的解决问题方法,用于识别初始错误的根本原因并找到预防复发的方法。在本研究中,护士和其他临床工作人员在与同事互动及与患者沟通时缺乏有效的沟通技巧、未遵守医疗保健提供标准、对临床指南实施缺乏充分监督以及与组织文化相关的问题是主要的决定因素,已考虑根据医院具体情况实施预防措施。

相似文献

1
Effect size of contributory factors on adverse events: an analysis of RCA series in a teaching hospital.促成因素对不良事件的效应量:一家教学医院的根本原因分析系列研究
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2016 Jul 28;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s40200-016-0249-3. eCollection 2015.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
Root cause analysis of serious adverse events among older patients in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局老年患者严重不良事件的根本原因分析
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Jun;40(6):253-62. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40034-5.
4
An Analysis of Adverse Events in the Rehabilitation Department: Using the Veterans Affairs Root Cause Analysis System.对康复科不良事件的分析:利用退伍军人事务部根本原因分析系统。
Phys Ther. 2018 Apr 1;98(4):223-230. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy003.
5
Aggregate analysis of sentinel events as a strategic tool in safety management can contribute to the improvement of healthcare safety.将哨点事件进行汇总分析作为安全管理中的一项战略工具,有助于改善医疗安全。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Mar 1;31(2):110-116. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy116.
6
Root Cause Analysis of ICU Adverse Events in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局重症监护病房不良事件的根本原因分析
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Nov;43(11):580-590. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
7
Can simulation improve the traditional method of root cause analysis: a preliminary investigation.模拟能否改进传统的根本原因分析方法:初步调查。
Surgery. 2012 Sep;152(3):489-97. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.029.
8
Root cause analysis of critical events in neurosurgery, New South Wales.新南威尔士州神经外科危急事件的根本原因分析
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Sep;85(9):626-30. doi: 10.1111/ans.12934. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
9
Delays in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Surgery: Root Causes, Actions Taken, and Recommendations for Healthcare Improvement.诊断、治疗及手术延误:根本原因、已采取的行动及改善医疗保健的建议
J Patient Saf. 2022 Oct 1;18(7):e1061-e1066. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001016. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
10
Investigation of the causes of maternal mortality using root cause analysis in Isfahan, Iran in 2013-2014.2013 - 2014年在伊朗伊斯法罕运用根本原因分析法对孕产妇死亡原因进行调查。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):315-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Recurrence of medical errors despite years of preventive measures: A grounded theory study.尽管采取了多年预防措施,医疗差错仍会复发:一项扎根理论研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Sep 29;12:329. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_17_23. eCollection 2023.
2
Team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study.哨兵事件后根本原因分析过程中的团队经验:定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):1224. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10178-3.
3
How Much of Root Cause Analysis Translates into Improved Patient Safety: A Systematic Review.根本原因分析在多大程度上转化为改善患者安全:系统评价。
Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(6):524-531. doi: 10.1159/000508677. Epub 2020 May 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Communication elements supporting patient safety in psychiatric inpatient care.支持精神科住院护理中患者安全的沟通要素。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Jun;22(5):298-305. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12187. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
2
An exploratory study of knowledge brokering in hospital settings: facilitating knowledge sharing and learning for patient safety?医院环境中的知识经纪人探索性研究:促进患者安全的知识共享和学习?
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Dec;98:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.037. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
3
Root cause analysis reports help identify common factors in delayed diagnosis and treatment of outpatients.根本原因分析报告有助于识别门诊延迟诊断和治疗的常见因素。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1368-75. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0130.
4
Interprofessional education in team communication: working together to improve patient safety.团队沟通中的跨专业教育:携手合作以提高患者安全。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 May;22(5):414-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000952. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
5
Quality review of an adverse incident reporting system and root cause analysis of serious adverse surgical incidents in a teaching hospital of Scotland.苏格兰一家教学医院不良事件报告系统的质量评估及严重外科不良事件的根本原因分析
Patient Saf Surg. 2012 Aug 29;6(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-6-21.
6
A root cause analysis project in a medication safety course.药物安全课程中的根本原因分析项目。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Aug 10;76(6):116. doi: 10.5688/ajpe766116.
7
Descriptions of verbal communication errors between staff. An analysis of 84 root cause analysis-reports from Danish hospitals.描述工作人员之间的口头沟通错误。对来自丹麦医院的 84 份根本原因分析报告的分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Mar;20(3):268-74. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.040238. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
8
[Root cause analysis: evaluation of medication errors at a university hospital].[根本原因分析:某大学医院用药错误评估]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2010 Mar;44(1):139-46. doi: 10.1590/s0080-62342010000100020.
9
Teamwork: building healthier workplaces and providing safer patient care.团队合作:打造更健康的工作场所并提供更安全的患者护理。
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2009 Jul-Sep;32(3):221-31. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0b013e3181ab923f.
10
Hand-off communication: a requisite for perioperative patient safety.
AORN J. 2008 Nov;88(5):763-770; quiz 771-4. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2008.07.022.