Mueller Nicolas, Loeffelsend Sophia, Vater Elke, Kempen Regina
Department of Business Psychology, Aalen University of Applied Sciences, Aalen, Germany.
Department of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 24;14:1149969. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149969. eCollection 2023.
Transformations in the work-nonwork interface highlight the importance of effectively managing the boundaries between life domains. However, do the ways individuals manage the boundaries between work and nonwork life change from one day to the next? If so, which antecedents may explain these intra-individual fluctuations in boundary management? Drawing on boundary management, spillover, and resource theories, we investigate daily changes in segmentation preferences and integration enactments as a function of experiencing strain in work and nonwork life. Assuming that changes in segmentation preferences reflect an individual's strategy to regulate negative cross-role spillover, we suppose that strain increases individuals' segmentation preferences; at the same time, however, it could force individuals to enact more integration.
We test our assumptions with data from two studies with different methodological approaches. The first study uses a daily diary research design (Study 1, 425 participants with 3,238 daily observations) in which full-time professionals rated strain in work and nonwork life, segmentation preferences, and integration enactments every evening for 10 workdays. The second study uses an experimental vignette research design (Study 2, 181 participants), where we experimentally manipulated strain in work and nonwork life and investigated causal effects on participants' hypothetical segmentation preferences.
The results of multilevel modeling analyses in Study 1 show that segmentation preferences and integration enactments fluctuate from day to day as a function of strain. More specifically, strain is related to preferring more segmentation but enacting more integration. Study 2 replicates the results of Study 1, showing that strain causally affects segmentation preferences.
This two-study paper is one of the first to address daily fluctuations in segmentation preferences and integration enactments, extending our knowledge of temporal dynamics in boundary management. Furthermore, it demonstrates that strain is an antecedent of these daily fluctuations, offering starting points for practical interventions.
工作与非工作界面的转变凸显了有效管理生活领域之间界限的重要性。然而,个体管理工作与非工作生活界限的方式会在一天到下一天之间发生变化吗?如果是这样,哪些前因可以解释这些界限管理中的个体内部波动呢?借鉴界限管理、溢出和资源理论,我们研究了作为工作和非工作生活中经历压力的函数的分割偏好和整合行为的日常变化。假设分割偏好的变化反映了个体调节负面跨角色溢出的策略,我们推测压力会增加个体的分割偏好;然而,与此同时,它可能会迫使个体进行更多的整合。
我们用来自两项采用不同方法的研究的数据来检验我们的假设。第一项研究采用每日日记研究设计(研究1,425名参与者,3238次每日观察),其中全职专业人员在10个工作日的每个晚上对工作和非工作生活中的压力、分割偏好和整合行为进行评分。第二项研究采用实验性 vignette 研究设计(研究2,181名参与者),我们在其中对工作和非工作生活中的压力进行实验性操纵,并研究对参与者假设的分割偏好的因果影响。
研究1中的多层次建模分析结果表明,分割偏好和整合行为会随着压力而每天波动。更具体地说,压力与更喜欢更多的分割但进行更多的整合有关。研究2复制了研究1的结果,表明压力对分割偏好有因果影响。
这篇包含两项研究的论文是最早探讨分割偏好和整合行为的每日波动的论文之一,扩展了我们对界限管理中时间动态的认识。此外,它表明压力是这些每日波动的一个前因,为实际干预提供了起点。