From the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota.
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Pain Medicine, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
Anesth Analg. 2024 Feb 1;138(2):395-419. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006607. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
In Part I of this series, we provide guidance for preparing a systematic review protocol. In this article, we highlight important steps and supplement with exemplars on conducting and reporting the results of a systematic review. We suggest how authors can manage protocol violations, multiplicity of outcomes and analyses, and heterogeneity. The quality (certainty) of the evidence and strength of recommendations should follow the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. It is our goal that Part II of this series provides valid guidance to authors and peer reviewers who conduct systematic reviews to adhere to important constructs of transparency, structure, reproducibility, and accountability. This will likely result in more rigorous systematic reviews being submitted for publication to the journals like Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine and Anesthesia & Analgesia .
在本系列的第一部分中，我们提供了准备系统评价方案的指导。在本文中，我们强调了重要步骤，并补充了关于系统评价的实施和报告结果的范例。我们建议作者如何管理方案违反、结果和分析的多重性以及异质性。证据的质量（确定性）和建议的强度应遵循推荐评估、制定和评估（GRADE）方法。我们的目标是，本系列的第二部分为进行系统评价的作者和同行评审者提供有效的指导，以遵守透明度、结构、可重复性和问责制等重要构建。这可能会导致更多严格的系统评价提交给区域麻醉与疼痛医学和麻醉与镇痛等期刊发表。
