Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Vaccine. 2023 Nov 30;41(49):7317-7321. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.10.037. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
Antipyretic analgesics are used to manage and control symptoms occurring after vaccination, but may hamper immunogenicity or vaccine efficacy. We examined the association between prophylactic or therapeutic use of antipyretic analgesics and SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers for vaccine recipients. Data were obtained from 1,498 staff members of a medical and research institution in Tokyo, Japan, who had received the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine. We quantitatively measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG titers in the participants three months after vaccination. The prophylactic and therapeutic use of antipyretic analgesics was ascertained via a questionnaire. A linear regression model was used to examine the association between antipyretic analgesic use and log-transformed anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG titers. Based on model parameters, we estimated geometric mean titers (GMT) and the corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI). The results showed that IgG titers in vaccine recipients who used antipyretic analgesics therapeutically was higher than the titers in those who did not (geometric mean ratio [GMR] = 1.26, 95 % CI = 1.17-1.34) with GMTs being 6,147 (95 % CI = 5,833-6,460) and 4,895 (95 % CI = 4,676-5,115) for those who used antipyretic analgesics therapeutically and those who did not, respectively. The association was attenuated, but remained statistically significant after adjusting for symptoms (GMR = 1.14, 95 % CI = 1.06-1.23). We did not find any evidence of significant association in relation to the prophylactic use of antipyretic analgesics (GMR = 0.96, 95 % CI = 0.84-1.10), with GMTs being 5,245 (95 % CI = 4,577-5,913) and 5,452 (95 % CI = 5,258-5,645) for those who used antipyretic analgesics prophylactically and those who did not, respectively. In conclusion, we did not find any evidence of suppression of the humoral response after the second dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination by prophylactic or therapeutic use of antipyretic analgesics.
解热镇痛药用于管理和控制接种后出现的症状,但可能会干扰免疫原性或疫苗效力。我们研究了预防或治疗性使用解热镇痛药与 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种者抗体滴度之间的关系。数据来自日本东京一家医疗和研究机构的 1498 名员工,他们接受了 BNT162b2 疫苗的第二剂。我们在接种后三个月定量测量了参与者的抗 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白 IgG 滴度。通过问卷确定了解热镇痛药的预防和治疗使用情况。使用线性回归模型检查了解热镇痛药使用与 log 转换的抗 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白 IgG 滴度之间的关系。基于模型参数,我们估计了几何平均滴度(GMT)和相应的 95%置信区间(CI)。结果表明,使用解热镇痛药治疗的疫苗接种者的 IgG 滴度高于未使用解热镇痛药治疗的疫苗接种者(几何平均比[GMR] = 1.26,95%CI = 1.17-1.34),GMT 分别为 6147(95%CI = 5833-6460)和 4895(95%CI = 4676-5115)。调整症状后,相关性减弱,但仍具有统计学意义(GMR = 1.14,95%CI = 1.06-1.23)。我们没有发现预防使用解热镇痛药与任何显著关联的证据(GMR = 0.96,95%CI = 0.84-1.10),GMT 分别为 5245(95%CI = 4577-5913)和 5452(95%CI = 5258-5645)。对于预防使用解热镇痛药的人和未使用解热镇痛药的人。总之,我们没有发现预防或治疗性使用解热镇痛药会抑制 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗第二剂接种后的体液反应的证据。