Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430030, China.
Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430030, China.
BMC Surg. 2023 Nov 10;23(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02257-3.
This study aims to investigate the management strategies for acute cholecystitis in the third trimester of pregnancy by comparing the effectiveness of three different treatments.
Clinical data of 102 patients with acute cholecystitis in third trimester of pregnancy admitted to three Tertiary Hospitals from January 2010 to June 2020 were collected and divided into 3 groups according to the primary treatment during their first hospitalization: Group A (surgical group; n = 11), Group B (percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGD) group, n = 29) and Group C (conservative treatment group, n = 62). The length of stay, readmission rate, and preterm delivery rate of each group were analyzed retrospectively.
The average age of patients included in this study was 29 ± 2.16 years with an average gestational cycle of 35.26 ± 1.02 weeks. The readmission rates of patients in groups A, B, and C were 9.09%, 24.14%, and 58.06%; the preterm delivery rates were 9.09%, 3.45%, and 12.90%; and the length of stay was 4.02 ± 1.02 days, 12.53 ± 2.21 days, and 11.22 ± 2.09 days, respectively. The readmission rate was lower in group A than in groups B and C, the preterm delivery rate was lower in group B than in groups A and C, and the length of stay was shorter in group A than in groups B and C (all with statistically significant differences, P < 0.05).
Patients with acute cholecystitis in late pregnancy need to be appropriately graded for severity and offered a sound treatment strategy after a thorough assessment of the condition while taking into account the willingness of the patients. For patients with mild severity, conservative treatment can be adopted; for patients with moderate or severe inflammation, PTGD can be performed first for symptom control, and wait till after delivery for surgery to be considered; and in some cases of critical condition and poor symptom control, surgical intervention should be promptly performed.
通过比较三种不同治疗方法的效果,探讨妊娠晚期急性胆囊炎的治疗策略。
收集 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间,3 家三级医院收治的 102 例妊娠晚期急性胆囊炎患者的临床资料,根据首次住院时的主要治疗方法将患者分为 3 组:A 组(手术组,n=11)、B 组(经皮经肝胆囊引流术(PTGD)组,n=29)和 C 组(保守治疗组,n=62)。回顾性分析各组患者的住院时间、再入院率和早产率。
本研究纳入患者的平均年龄为 29±2.16 岁,平均妊娠周期为 35.26±1.02 周。A、B、C 组患者的再入院率分别为 9.09%、24.14%和 58.06%;早产率分别为 9.09%、3.45%和 12.90%;住院时间分别为 4.02±1.02 天、12.53±2.21 天和 11.22±2.09 天。A 组再入院率低于 B、C 组,B 组早产率低于 A、C 组,A 组住院时间短于 B、C 组(均有统计学差异,P<0.05)。
妊娠晚期急性胆囊炎患者需要根据病情严重程度进行适当分级,并在充分评估病情的基础上,结合患者意愿,制定合理的治疗策略。对于轻度患者,可采用保守治疗;对于中重度炎症患者,可先行 PTGD 控制症状,待分娩后再考虑手术;对于一些病情危急、症状控制不佳的患者,应及时行手术干预。