He Beibei, Shi Jingjing, Liu Kuanbo, Cheng Junlin, Wang Weiwei, Wang Yongwei, Li Aike
Institute of Grain Quality and Nutrition, Academy of National Food and Strategic Reserves Administration, Beijing 100037, China.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Oct 31;13(21):3381. doi: 10.3390/ani13213381.
Long-term storage may reduce the nutritional quality of brown rice, so the present study aimed to evaluate the nutritional values of long-term-stored nutrition in pig diets. In Exp. 1, 18 Landrace × Yorkshire (L × Y) barrows with an initial body weight (IBW) of 25.48 ± 3.21 kg were randomly assigned to three treatments, including a corn-based diet, one-year-stored brown rice (BR1) diet, and six-year-stored brown rice (BR6) diet, to determine the digestible energy (DE) and metabolizable energy (ME) values of stored brown rice. In Exp. 2, 24 barrows (L × Y; IBW: 22.16 ± 2.42 kg) fixed with ileal T-cannula were randomly allotted to four dietary treatments, including a corn diet, two stored brown rice diets, and a nitrogen-free diet, to evaluate the amino acid (AA) digestibility of the stored brown rice. In Exp. 3 and 4, 108 crossbred weaned piglets (L × Y; IBW: 9.16 ± 0.89 kg) and 90 crossbred growing pigs (L × Y; IBW: 48.28 ± 3.51 kg) were allotted to three treatment diets, including a control diet and two stored brown rice diets, respectively, to investigate the application of stored brown rice in weaned piglets and fully grown pig diets. The results indicated that there was no significant difference in the DE and ME values between corn and stored brown rice ( > 0.05), while the apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of arginine, histidine, asparagine + aspartic acid (Asx), and the standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of arginine and histidine were higher in the stored brown rice diet compared to the corn diet ( < 0.05). Compared to the corn, the stored brown rice showed no significant effects on growth performance, nutrient-apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD), and serum biochemical indices ( > 0.05) but showed decreased activity in the various digestive enzymes in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum of the weaned piglets ( < 0.05). Also, the stored brown rice diet showed no significant effects on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, as well as the fatty acid profiles in the longissimus dorsi muscle of fully grown pigs compared with the corn diet ( > 0.05). In conclusion, the brown rice stored for 6 years under good conditions had no obvious changes in the available energy and nutrient values. Although it may reduce digestive enzyme activity in the small intestines of the piglets, the stored brown rice showed no obvious adverse effects on growth performance and meat quality and can be effectively used in pig diets.
长期储存可能会降低糙米的营养品质,因此本研究旨在评估长期储存的糙米在猪日粮中的营养价值。在实验1中,将18头初始体重(IBW)为25.48±3.21千克的长白×大白(L×Y)公猪随机分配到三种日粮处理组,包括玉米型日粮、储存一年的糙米(BR1)日粮和储存六年的糙米(BR6)日粮,以测定储存糙米的消化能(DE)和代谢能(ME)值。在实验2中,将24头安装有回肠T型套管的公猪(L×Y;IBW:22.16±2.42千克)随机分配到四种日粮处理组,包括玉米日粮、两种储存糙米日粮和无氮日粮,以评估储存糙米的氨基酸(AA)消化率。在实验3和实验4中,分别将108头杂交断奶仔猪(L×Y;IBW:9.16±0.89千克)和90头杂交生长猪(L×Y;IBW:48.28±3.51千克)分配到三种日粮处理组,包括对照日粮和两种储存糙米日粮,以研究储存糙米在断奶仔猪和成年猪日粮中的应用。结果表明,玉米和储存糙米之间的DE和ME值没有显著差异(P>0.05),而与玉米日粮相比,储存糙米日粮中精氨酸、组氨酸、天冬酰胺+天冬氨酸(Asx)的表观回肠消化率(AID)以及精氨酸和组氨酸的标准回肠消化率(SID)更高(P<0.05)。与玉米相比,储存糙米对生长性能、养分表观全肠道消化率(ATTD)和血清生化指标没有显著影响(P>0.05),但断奶仔猪十二指肠、空肠和回肠中各种消化酶的活性降低(P<0.05)。此外,与玉米日粮相比,储存糙米日粮对成年猪的生长性能、胴体性状、肉质以及背最长肌中的脂肪酸组成没有显著影响(P>0.05)。总之,在良好条件下储存6年的糙米在可利用能量和营养价值方面没有明显变化。虽然它可能会降低仔猪小肠中的消化酶活性,但储存糙米对生长性能和肉质没有明显的不利影响,并且可以有效地用于猪日粮中。