Suppr超能文献

农村和偏远地区的 COVID-19 防范与应对:一项范围综述。

COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas: A scoping review.

作者信息

Dudley Lilian, Couper Ian, Kannangarage Niluka Wijekoon, Naidoo Selvan, Ribas Clara Rodriguez, Koller Theadora Swift, Young Taryn

机构信息

Division of Health Systems and Public Health, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Ukwanda Centre for Rural Health, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Nov 15;3(11):e0002602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002602. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

This scoping review used the Arksey and O'Malley approach to explore COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas to identify lessons to inform future health preparedness and response planning. A search of scientific and grey literature for rural COVID-19 preparedness and responses identified 5 668 articles published between 2019 and early 2022. A total of 293 articles were included, of which 160 (54.5%) were from high income countries and 106 (36.2%) from middle income countries. Studies focused mostly on the Maintenance of Essential Health Services (63; 21.5%), Surveillance, epidemiological investigation, contact tracing and adjustment of public health and social measures (60; 20.5%), Coordination and Planning (32; 10.9%); Case Management (30; 10.2%), Social Determinants of Health (29; 10%) and Risk Communication (22; 7.5%). Rural health systems were less prepared and national COVID-19 responses were often not adequately tailored to rural areas. Promising COVID-19 responses involved local leaders and communities, were collaborative and multisectoral, and engaged local cultures. Non-pharmaceutical interventions were applied less, support for access to water and sanitation at scale was weak, and more targeted approaches to the isolation of cases and quarantine of contacts were preferable to blanket lockdowns. Rural pharmacists, community health workers and agricultural extension workers assisted in overcoming shortages of health professionals. Vaccination coverage was hindered by weaker rural health systems. Digital technology enabled better coordination, communication, and access to health services, yet for some was inaccessible. Rural livelihoods and food security were affected through disruptions to local labour markets, farm produce markets and input supply chains. Important lessons include the need for rural proofing national health preparedness and response and optimizing synergies between top-down planning with localised planning and coordination. Equity-oriented rural health systems strengthening and action on rural social determinants is essential to better prepare for and respond to future outbreaks.

摘要

本范围综述采用阿克西和奥马利的方法,探讨农村和偏远地区对新冠疫情的防范与应对措施,以总结经验教训,为未来的卫生防范与应对规划提供参考。通过检索科学文献和灰色文献,查找有关农村地区新冠疫情防范与应对的资料,共识别出2019年至2022年初发表的5668篇文章。最终纳入293篇文章,其中160篇(54.5%)来自高收入国家,106篇(36.2%)来自中等收入国家。研究主要集中在基本卫生服务的维持(63篇;21.5%)、监测、流行病学调查、接触者追踪以及公共卫生和社会措施的调整(60篇;20.5%)、协调与规划(32篇;10.9%)、病例管理(30篇;10.2%)、健康的社会决定因素(29篇;10%)和风险沟通(22篇;7.5%)。农村卫生系统的准备不足,国家层面的新冠疫情应对措施往往没有充分考虑农村地区的特点。有效的新冠疫情应对措施涉及地方领导人和社区,具有协作性和多部门性,并融入了当地文化。非药物干预措施的应用较少,大规模供水和卫生设施支持薄弱,针对病例隔离和接触者检疫采用更具针对性的方法优于全面封锁。农村药剂师、社区卫生工作者和农业推广人员协助克服了卫生专业人员短缺的问题。农村卫生系统薄弱阻碍了疫苗接种覆盖率。数字技术有助于更好地协调、沟通和提供卫生服务,但对一些人来说无法获取。农村生计和粮食安全受到当地劳动力市场、农产品市场和投入供应链中断的影响。重要的经验教训包括,需要针对农村地区特点完善国家卫生防范与应对措施,优化自上而下的规划与本地化规划及协调之间的协同效应。加强以公平为导向的农村卫生系统并针对农村社会决定因素采取行动,对于更好地防范和应对未来疫情至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1a8/10651055/8a2fb6ee750a/pgph.0002602.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验