• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扭转趋势:从低、中收入国家向高收入国家转移或交流卫生创新的范围综述。

Reversing the trend: a scoping review of health innovation transfer or exchange from low- and middle-income countries to high-income countries.

机构信息

Institute of Global Health Equity Research, University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda

College of Health Sciences, Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare, Eldoret, Kenya.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Nov;8(Suppl 7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013583.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013583
PMID:37967892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10660955/
Abstract

The transfer of innovations from low and middle-income countries (LMICs) to high-income countries (HICs) has received little attention, leaving gaps in the understanding of the process, its benefits and the factors influencing it. This scoping review, part of a National Institutes of Health (NIH) project and the focus for a 2022 NIH-sponsored workshop on Global Health Reciprocal Innovation, sought to identify publications describing health innovations that were researched, developed and implemented in LMICs and adapted to address similar health challenges in HICs. A protocol was written and registered on Open Science Framework. Four databases were searched for articles published in English from 2000 to 2022 and described health innovations developed in LMICs and were transferred to HICs. Using Covidence, two reviewers initially screened the title and abstract and then the full text; discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Two reviewers collected the data from each article using Covidence and Microsoft Excel; discrepancies were resolved by a separate third reviewer. 7191 records were retrieved and screened of which 12 studies were included. Various frameworks and methodologies were employed in these studies, with a particular emphasis on adaptation and adoption of innovations. The review uncovered different paradigms of LMIC to HIC innovation transfer and exchange, including unidirectional transfers from LMICs to HICs as well as bidirectional or multidirectional mutually beneficial exchanges. The use of both qualitative and quantitative data collection methods was common across all the included articles. Facilitators for innovation transfers included stakeholder engagement, relevance of local context, simplicity, and sufficient funding, promotion and branding. Barriers to transfers were mostly the opposite of the facilitators. Our results highlighted the underexplored field of LMIC to HIC innovation transfer and exchange and lay the foundation for future research studies.

摘要

从低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)向高收入国家(HICs)转移创新的问题很少受到关注,导致人们对这一过程、其收益以及影响因素的理解存在空白。这项范围界定审查是美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)项目的一部分,也是 2022 年 NIH 主办的全球卫生互惠创新研讨会的重点。该审查旨在确定描述在 LMICs 中进行研究、开发和实施,并针对 HICs 中的类似健康挑战进行调整的健康创新的出版物。制定了一份方案,并在开放科学框架上进行了注册。在英语发表的文章从 2000 年到 2022 年,从四个数据库中搜索了描述在 LMICs 中开发并转移到 HICs 的健康创新的文章。使用 Covidence,两名审查员最初筛选标题和摘要,然后筛选全文;通过讨论解决分歧。两名审查员使用 Covidence 和 Microsoft Excel 从每篇文章中收集数据;通过单独的第三名审查员解决分歧。检索并筛选了 7191 条记录,其中包括 12 项研究。这些研究采用了各种框架和方法,特别强调了创新的适应性和采用。审查发现了 LMIC 向 HIC 创新转移和交流的不同模式,包括从 LMIC 单向转移到 HIC 以及双向或多向互利交流。所有纳入的文章都普遍使用定性和定量数据收集方法。创新转移的促进因素包括利益相关者的参与、当地背景的相关性、简单性以及充足的资金、推广和品牌。转移的障碍大多与促进因素相反。我们的研究结果突出了 LMIC 向 HIC 创新转移和交流这一尚未得到充分探索的领域,并为未来的研究奠定了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/299d/10660955/0b56884d1b0e/bmjgh-2023-013583f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/299d/10660955/0b56884d1b0e/bmjgh-2023-013583f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/299d/10660955/0b56884d1b0e/bmjgh-2023-013583f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Reversing the trend: a scoping review of health innovation transfer or exchange from low- and middle-income countries to high-income countries.扭转趋势:从低、中收入国家向高收入国家转移或交流卫生创新的范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Nov;8(Suppl 7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013583.
2
Criteria to assess potential reverse innovations: opportunities for shared learning between high- and low-income countries.评估潜在逆向创新的标准:高收入国家和低收入国家之间共享学习的机会。
Global Health. 2017 Jan 25;13(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0225-1.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Income-Based Disparities in Perceived Benefits and Challenges of Virtual Global Health Activities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Analysis.新冠疫情期间基于收入的虚拟全球卫生活动感知收益与挑战的差异:混合方法分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 7;27:e63066. doi: 10.2196/63066.
5
Facilitators and barriers impacting in-hospital Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) implementation across country income levels: a scoping review.在不同国家收入水平下,影响创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)实施的促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e068219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068219.
6
Global health reciprocal innovation: ethical, legal and regulatory considerations.全球健康互惠创新:伦理、法律和监管方面的考虑。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 May 30;8(Suppl 7):e014693. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014693.
7
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of evidence-based task-sharing mental health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review using implementation science frameworks.在中低收入国家实施基于证据的任务分担精神卫生干预措施的障碍和促进因素:使用实施科学框架的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 12;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01179-z.
8
An Analysis of Contemporary Oncology Randomized Clinical Trials From Low/Middle-Income vs High-Income Countries.低收入和中等收入国家与高收入国家当代肿瘤随机临床试验分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;7(3):379-385. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7478.
9
Forming and implementing community advisory boards in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.在中低收入国家组建和实施社区咨询委员会:范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 17;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0409-3.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of valvular surgery in high- and low- to middle-income countries: A scoping review.高收入和中低收入国家瓣膜手术的成本效益分析:范围综述。
World J Surg. 2024 Nov;48(11):2571-2585. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12381. Epub 2024 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Student experiences and perspectives on decolonising global health education: a qualitative study across five Nordic countries.学生对全球卫生教育去殖民化的经历与看法:一项横跨五个北欧国家的定性研究
Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2512624. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2512624. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
2
The Impact of Social Determinants of Health, Health Resources, and Environmental Factors on Infant Mortality Rates in Three Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries.健康的社会决定因素、卫生资源和环境因素对海湾合作委员会(GCC)三个国家婴儿死亡率的影响
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Feb 21;15(3):26. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15030026.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Global health reciprocal innovation: ethical, legal and regulatory considerations.全球健康互惠创新:伦理、法律和监管方面的考虑。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 May 30;8(Suppl 7):e014693. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014693.
2
Evaluation of a Program to Reduce Infant Mortality Risk Factors in Central Indiana.评估印第安纳州中部降低婴儿死亡率风险因素的项目。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(3):1461-1477. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0124.
3
Reciprocal innovation: A new approach to equitable and mutually beneficial global health partnerships.
Reimagining Global Health: Accelerating Change for a Sustainable Future.
重塑全球健康:加速变革,共创可持续未来。
Ann Glob Health. 2025 Jan 25;91(1):6. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4616. eCollection 2025.
4
Global health reciprocal innovation: ethical, legal and regulatory considerations.全球健康互惠创新:伦理、法律和监管方面的考虑。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 May 30;8(Suppl 7):e014693. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014693.
5
The case for global health reciprocal innovation.全球卫生互惠创新的理由。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 May 30;8(Suppl 7):e013582. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013582.
互惠创新:公平互利的全球卫生伙伴关系的新途径。
Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan;18(1):2102202. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2102202. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
4
Benefiting the NHS through innovation: how to ensure international health partnerships are genuinely reciprocal.通过创新使英国国家医疗服务体系受益:如何确保国际卫生伙伴关系真正互利互惠。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(Suppl 6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-004936.
5
A call to action to reform academic global health partnerships.呼吁改革学术性全球卫生伙伴关系的行动。
BMJ. 2021 Nov 1;375:n2658. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2658.
6
Community engagement in the prevention and control of COVID-19: Insights from Vietnam.社区参与 COVID-19 的预防和控制:来自越南的见解。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 8;16(9):e0254432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254432. eCollection 2021.
7
Testing on the move: South Korea's rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic.移动检测:韩国对新冠疫情的快速响应。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 May;5:100111. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100111. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
8
Community overdose surveillance: Comparing substances collected from the death scene investigation to toxicology results.社区药物过量监测:将从死亡现场调查中收集的物质与毒理学结果进行比较。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jul 1;224:108722. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108722. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
9
Immune Response to COVID-19: Can We Benefit from the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV Pandemic Experience?对2019冠状病毒病的免疫反应:我们能否从严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒和中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒大流行的经验中获益?
Pathogens. 2020 Sep 9;9(9):739. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9090739.
10
Engaging With Communities - Lessons (Re)Learned From COVID-19.社区参与——从 COVID-19 中汲取的(重新)经验教训。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Jul 16;17:E65. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200250.