• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

塑造社交媒体:Twitter 是否是专业发展的公平工具?

Shaping Social Media: Is Twitter an Equitable tool for Professional Development?

机构信息

Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Department of Paediatrics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Syst. 2023 Nov 16;47(1):117. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-02013-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10916-023-02013-3
PMID:37971606
Abstract

PURPOSE

Twitter has become a powerful tool for professional development in academia. However, studies from the general population suggest that racialized and gender biases disproportionately empower male and white users. We characterized the demographics of Twitter influencers in Canadian healthcare.

METHODS

We used the Right Relevance Insight API algorithm to identify Twitter influencers in the healthcare, healthcare research, and health policy domains, and to generated normalized influencer scores based on user connections and engagement. We used facial recognition software to approximate the influencers' race and sex.

RESULTS

The majority of influencers identified were white (84%) and/or male (60%). Males had significantly higher influencer scores than females (65.1 ± 8.0 vs. 61.2 ± 6.2, P < 0.05) in health policy. We did not identify any sex- or race-associated disparities among influencers in healthcare or healthcare research.

CONCLUSION

Male users have significantly higher levels of influence in health policy on Twitter. Given the importance of Twitter as a tool for professional development, it is crucial that institutional leaders and policymakers are aware of potential inequities in user reach. Future studies should evaluate additional factors shaping user influence in healthcare on Twitter, with a focus on equity, diversity, and trustworthiness.

摘要

目的

Twitter 已成为学术界专业发展的有力工具。然而,来自普通人群的研究表明,种族和性别偏见不成比例地赋予了男性和白人用户权力。我们描述了加拿大医疗保健领域 Twitter 影响者的人口统计学特征。

方法

我们使用 Right Relevance Insight API 算法来识别医疗保健、医疗保健研究和健康政策领域的 Twitter 影响者,并根据用户联系和参与度生成标准化的影响者得分。我们使用面部识别软件来近似影响者的种族和性别。

结果

确定的大多数影响者是白人(84%)和/或男性(60%)。在健康政策方面,男性的影响者得分明显高于女性(65.1±8.0 对 61.2±6.2,P<0.05)。我们没有在医疗保健或医疗保健研究中发现任何与性别或种族相关的影响者差异。

结论

在 Twitter 上,男性用户在健康政策方面的影响力明显更高。鉴于 Twitter 作为专业发展工具的重要性,机构领导者和政策制定者必须意识到用户影响力方面可能存在的不平等。未来的研究应该评估影响 Twitter 上医疗保健中用户影响力的其他因素,重点关注公平性、多样性和可信度。

相似文献

1
Shaping Social Media: Is Twitter an Equitable tool for Professional Development?塑造社交媒体:Twitter 是否是专业发展的公平工具?
J Med Syst. 2023 Nov 16;47(1):117. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-02013-3.
2
Across the Twitter-verse: Is Twitter an equitable tool in academic medicine? A scoping review.跨越推特世界:推特在学术医学中是公平的工具吗?一项范围综述。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Aug;28(3):997-1013. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10201-y. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
3
Characteristics of General Surgery Social Media Influencers on Twitter.社交媒体上普通外科医生大 V 的特征。
Am Surg. 2021 Mar;87(3):492-498. doi: 10.1177/0003134820951427. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
4
Top 100 Urology Influencers on Twitter: Is Social Media Influence Associated with Academic Impact?Twitter上排名前100的泌尿外科有影响力的人:社交媒体影响力与学术影响力有关联吗?
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Mar;9(2):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.09.009. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
5
The Top 100 Social Media Influencers in Plastic Surgery on Twitter: Who Should You Be Following?推特上整形手术领域的前100名社交媒体有影响力的人:你应该关注谁?
Aesthet Surg J. 2018 Jul 13;38(8):913-917. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy024.
6
The top 100 Twitter influencers in cardiology.心脏病学领域推特上最具影响力的100人。
AIMS Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;8(4):743-753. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021058. eCollection 2021.
7
Inflammatory Bowel Disease and X (Formerly Twitter) Influencers: Who Are They and What Do They Say?炎症性肠病与X(原推特)有影响力的人:他们是谁以及他们说了什么?
Cureus. 2023 Oct 23;15(10):e47536. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47536. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
#OtoTwitter: The Top 75 Twitter Influencers in Otolaryngology and Association With Academic Impact.#耳科推特:耳鼻喉科领域最具影响力的75位推特用户及其与学术影响力的关联
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jun;170(6):1676-1683. doi: 10.1002/ohn.721. Epub 2024 Mar 17.
9
#Botox 101: Subgroup Analysis of Twitter's Top 101 Neurotoxin Influencers.肉毒素 101:对推特排名前 101 的神经毒素影响者的亚组分析。
Dermatol Surg. 2021 Nov 1;47(11):1474-1479. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003192.
10
Who should you be following? The top 100 social media influencers in orthopaedic surgery.你应该关注谁?骨科手术领域的前100名社交媒体有影响力的人。
World J Orthop. 2019 Sep 18;10(9):327-338. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i9.327.

引用本文的文献

1
Social justice and social media: How medical schools display critical consciousness online.社会正义与社交媒体:医学院校如何在网上展现批判意识。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Aug 7;4(8):e0000981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000981. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Expanding Opportunities for Professional Development: Utilization of Twitter by Early Career Women in Academic Medicine and Science.拓展职业发展机会:学术医学与科学界早期职业女性对推特的利用
JMIR Med Educ. 2018 Jul 23;4(2):e11140. doi: 10.2196/11140.
2
Influence of Social Media on the Dissemination of a Traditional Surgical Research Article.社交媒体对一篇传统外科研究文章传播的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2017 Jan-Feb;74(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Dec 16.