• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者外周置入中心静脉导管非计划性拔管的风险因素和预测模型:前瞻性、机器学习研究。

Risk Factors and Predictive Models for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Unplanned Extubation in Patients With Cancer: Prospective, Machine Learning Study.

机构信息

Teaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 16;25:e49016. doi: 10.2196/49016.

DOI:10.2196/49016
PMID:37971792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10690529/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer indeed represents a significant public health challenge, and unplanned extubation of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC-UE) is a critical concern in patient safety. Identifying independent risk factors and implementing high-quality assessment tools for early detection in high-risk populations can play a crucial role in reducing the incidence of PICC-UE among patients with cancer. Precise prevention and treatment strategies are essential to improve patient outcomes and safety in clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify the independent risk factors associated with PICC-UE in patients with cancer and to construct a predictive model tailored to this group, offering a theoretical framework for anticipating and preventing PICC-UE in these patients.

METHODS

Prospective data were gathered from January to December 2022, encompassing patients with cancer with PICC at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. Each patient underwent continuous monitoring until the catheter's removal. The patients were categorized into 2 groups: the UE group (n=3107) and the non-UE group (n=284). Independent risk factors were identified through univariate analysis, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm, and multivariate analysis. Subsequently, the 3391 patients were classified into a train set and a test set in a 7:3 ratio. Utilizing the identified predictors, 3 predictive models were constructed using the logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest algorithms. The ultimate model was selected based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) synthesis analysis. To further validate the model, we gathered prospective data from 600 patients with cancer at the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and Hainan Provincial People's Hospital from June to December 2022. We assessed the model's performance using the area under the curve of the ROC to evaluate differentiation, the calibration curve for calibration capability, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to gauge the model's clinical applicability.

RESULTS

Independent risk factors for PICC-UE in patients with cancer were identified, including impaired physical mobility (odds ratio [OR] 2.775, 95% CI 1.951-3.946), diabetes (OR 1.754, 95% CI 1.134-2.712), surgical history (OR 1.734, 95% CI 1.313-2.290), elevated D-dimer concentration (OR 2.376, 95% CI 1.778-3.176), targeted therapy (OR 1.441, 95% CI 1.104-1.881), surgical treatment (OR 1.543, 95% CI 1.152-2.066), and more than 1 catheter puncture (OR 1.715, 95% CI 1.121-2.624). Protective factors were normal BMI (OR 0.449, 95% CI 0.342-0.590), polyurethane catheter material (OR 0.305, 95% CI 0.228-0.408), and valved catheter (OR 0.639, 95% CI 0.480-0.851). The TOPSIS synthesis analysis results showed that in the train set, the composite index (Ci) values were 0.00 for the logistic model, 0.82 for the support vector machine model, and 0.85 for the random forest model. In the test set, the Ci values were 0.00 for the logistic model, 1.00 for the support vector machine model, and 0.81 for the random forest model. The optimal model, constructed based on the support vector machine, was obtained and validated externally. The ROC curve, calibration curve, and DCA curve demonstrated that the model exhibited excellent accuracy, stability, generalizability, and clinical applicability.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, this study identified 10 independent risk factors for PICC-UE in patients with cancer. The predictive model developed using the support vector machine algorithm demonstrated excellent clinical applicability and was validated externally, providing valuable support for the early prediction of PICC-UE in patients with cancer.

摘要

背景

癌症确实是一个重大的公共卫生挑战,外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)非计划性拔管是患者安全的一个关键关注点。确定独立的风险因素,并为高危人群实施高质量的评估工具,以便早期发现,这对于降低癌症患者 PICC 非计划性拔管的发生率至关重要。精确的预防和治疗策略对于改善临床环境中的患者预后和安全至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在确定癌症患者发生 PICC 非计划性拔管的独立风险因素,并为该人群构建预测模型,为预测和预防这些患者的 PICC 非计划性拔管提供理论框架。

方法

前瞻性收集 2022 年 1 月至 12 月期间在中南大学湘雅医院接受 PICC 的癌症患者的数据。每位患者在导管拔除前都进行持续监测。将患者分为两组:非计划性拔管组(UE 组,n=3107)和非非计划性拔管组(非 UE 组,n=284)。通过单因素分析、最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)算法和多因素分析确定独立风险因素。随后,将 3391 名患者按 7:3 的比例分为训练集和测试集。利用确定的预测因素,使用逻辑回归、支持向量机和随机森林算法构建了 3 个预测模型。最终模型是根据受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和逼近理想解的技术合成分析(TOPSIS)选择的。为了进一步验证模型,我们从 2022 年 6 月至 12 月在青海大学附属医院和海南省人民医院前瞻性收集了 600 名癌症患者的数据。使用 ROC 曲线下面积评估模型的区分能力,校准曲线评估校准能力,决策曲线分析(DCA)评估模型的临床适用性。

结果

确定了癌症患者发生 PICC 非计划性拔管的独立风险因素,包括身体活动受限(优势比[OR]2.775,95%置信区间[CI]1.951-3.946)、糖尿病(OR 1.754,95%CI 1.134-2.712)、手术史(OR 1.734,95%CI 1.313-2.290)、D-二聚体浓度升高(OR 2.376,95%CI 1.778-3.176)、靶向治疗(OR 1.441,95%CI 1.104-1.881)、手术治疗(OR 1.543,95%CI 1.152-2.066)和导管穿刺次数超过 1 次(OR 1.715,95%CI 1.121-2.624)。保护因素包括正常 BMI(OR 0.449,95%CI 0.342-0.590)、聚氨酯导管材料(OR 0.305,95%CI 0.228-0.408)和带瓣膜的导管(OR 0.639,95%CI 0.480-0.851)。TOPSIS 综合分析结果显示,在训练集中,逻辑模型的综合指数(Ci)值为 0.00,支持向量机模型为 0.82,随机森林模型为 0.85。在测试集中,逻辑模型的 Ci 值为 0.00,支持向量机模型为 1.00,随机森林模型为 0.81。基于支持向量机构建的最优模型得到验证,并在外部进行了验证。ROC 曲线、校准曲线和 DCA 曲线表明,该模型具有优异的准确性、稳定性、可推广性和临床适用性。

结论

综上所述,本研究确定了癌症患者发生 PICC 非计划性拔管的 10 个独立风险因素。使用支持向量机算法构建的预测模型具有出色的临床适用性,并在外部得到验证,为癌症患者 PICC 非计划性拔管的早期预测提供了有价值的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/6c27489f59b0/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/fb169ae95076/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/6264abf36e1c/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/827e97ed9cb9/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/b9b294ac577a/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/3c3c3f216790/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/9475a50b1717/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/62705db2573d/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/cfe4dc895927/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/fee92caee1e1/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/6c27489f59b0/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/fb169ae95076/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/6264abf36e1c/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/827e97ed9cb9/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/b9b294ac577a/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/3c3c3f216790/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/9475a50b1717/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/62705db2573d/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/cfe4dc895927/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/fee92caee1e1/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d42/10690529/6c27489f59b0/jmir_v25i1e49016_fig10.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Factors and Predictive Models for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Unplanned Extubation in Patients With Cancer: Prospective, Machine Learning Study.癌症患者外周置入中心静脉导管非计划性拔管的风险因素和预测模型:前瞻性、机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 16;25:e49016. doi: 10.2196/49016.
2
Development and Validation of Unplanned Extubation Prediction Models Using Intensive Care Unit Data: Retrospective, Comparative, Machine Learning Study.基于 ICU 数据的非计划性拔管预测模型的开发和验证:回顾性、对比、机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 11;23(8):e23508. doi: 10.2196/23508.
3
Predictive Model for PICC Occlusion Risk for Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Clinical Study.预测 ICU 患者 PICC 阻塞风险的模型:一项回顾性临床研究。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2023 Nov;29(8):278-285.
4
Comparative Predictive Modeling for PICC Line Complications in Oncology: A Retrospective Study.比较肿瘤患者 PICC 置管并发症的预测模型:一项回顾性研究。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2024 Sep 30;85(9):1-15. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2024.0176. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
5
Construction and validation of a nomogram prediction model for the catheter-related thrombosis risk of central venous access devices in patients with cancer: a prospective machine learning study.癌症患者中心静脉通路装置导管相关血栓形成风险的列线图预测模型的构建与验证:一项前瞻性机器学习研究
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Feb;58(2):220-231. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-03045-3. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
6
Establishment and validation of a predictive model for peripherally inserted central catheter-related thrombosis in patients with liver cancer.肝癌患者外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管相关血栓形成预测模型的建立与验证
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):2221-2231. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2221.
7
Risk factors and prediction model construction for peripherally inserted central catheter-related infections.外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管相关感染的危险因素及预测模型构建
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 3;10(8):e29158. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29158. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
8
Peripherally inserted central catheter usage patterns and associated symptomatic upper extremity venous thrombosis.外周置入中心静脉导管使用模式与相关的症状性上肢静脉血栓形成。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Mar;55(3):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.005.
9
Comparison of machine learning models for the prediction of mortality of patients with unplanned extubation in intensive care units.比较机器学习模型在预测 ICU 中非计划性拔管患者死亡率的应用。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 20;8(1):17116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35582-2.
10
The Caprini thrombosis risk model predicts the risk of peripherally inserted central catheter-related upper extremity venous thrombosis in patients with cancer.卡普里尼血栓形成风险模型可预测癌症患者发生经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管相关上肢静脉血栓形成的风险。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Sep;9(5):1151-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.12.075. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting 90-day risk of urinary tract infections following urostomy in bladder cancer patients using machine learning and explainability.利用机器学习和可解释性预测膀胱癌患者尿路造口术后90天尿路感染风险
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 25;15(1):6807. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91075-z.
2
Mime: A flexible machine-learning framework to construct and visualize models for clinical characteristics prediction and feature selection.Mime:一个灵活的机器学习框架,用于构建和可视化临床特征预测及特征选择模型。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Jun 29;23:2798-2810. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.06.035. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for early PICC removal: A retrospective study of adult inpatients at an academic medical center.成人住院患者 PICC 早期拔除的危险因素:一项学术医疗中心的回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0264245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264245. eCollection 2022.
2
Support Vector Machine Based Lane-Changing Behavior Recognition and Lateral Trajectory Prediction.基于支持向量机的换道行为识别与横向轨迹预测。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 10;2022:3632333. doi: 10.1155/2022/3632333. eCollection 2022.
3
A model to assess the risk of peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related thrombosis in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
评估乳腺癌患者经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管相关血栓形成风险的模型:一项回顾性队列研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Feb;30(2):1127-1137. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06511-3. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
Secondary malposition of a PICC-port due to heavy physical exercise: A case report.因剧烈体力活动导致的 PICC 置管后导管异位:1 例报告。
J Vasc Access. 2023 May;24(3):507-510. doi: 10.1177/11297298211039445. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
5
Development and Validation of Unplanned Extubation Prediction Models Using Intensive Care Unit Data: Retrospective, Comparative, Machine Learning Study.基于 ICU 数据的非计划性拔管预测模型的开发和验证:回顾性、对比、机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 11;23(8):e23508. doi: 10.2196/23508.
6
Catheterization of PICC through a superficial femoral vein for patients with superior vena cava syndrome using ECG positioning and ultrasound-guided technologies.经皮超声引导下改良塞丁格技术行股静脉 PICC 置管在上腔静脉综合征患者中的应用
J Vasc Access. 2023 May;24(3):397-401. doi: 10.1177/11297298211035331. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
7
Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Severe COVID-19: A Case-Control Study in China.严重新型冠状病毒肺炎预测模型的开发与验证:一项中国的病例对照研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 25;8:663145. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.663145. eCollection 2021.
8
Catheter related thrombosis in hospitalized infants: A neural network approach to predict risk factors.住院婴儿的导管相关性血栓形成:预测危险因素的神经网络方法。
Thromb Res. 2021 Apr;200:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
9
Risk factors for emergence agitation in adults after general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全麻后成年人苏醒期躁动的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Jul;65(6):719-729. doi: 10.1111/aas.13774. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
10
Incidence and risk factors of symptomatic thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheter in patients with lung cancer.肺癌患者外周置入中心静脉导管相关症状性血栓的发生率及危险因素。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Mar;77(3):1284-1292. doi: 10.1111/jan.14666. Epub 2020 Nov 29.